万物简史英文版_比尔·布莱森-第27章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！



on　the　whole；　however；　rutherford　didn鈥檛　thrive　at　the　cavendish。　after　three　years　there；feeling　he　was　going　nowhere；　he　took　a　post　at　mcgill　university　in　montreal；　and　there　hebegan　his　long　and　steady　rise　to　greatness。　by　the　time　he　received　his　nobel　prize　（for鈥渋nvestigations　into　the　disintegration　of　the　elements；　and　the　chemistry　of　radioactivesubstances；鈥潯�according　to　the　official　citation）　he　had　moved　on　to　manchester　university；and　it　was　there；　in　fact；　that　he　would　do　his　most　important　work　in　determining　thestructure　and　nature　of　the　atom。

1the　name　es　from　the　same　cavendishes　who　producec　henry。　this　one　was　william　cavendish；　seventhduke　of　devonshire；　who　was　a　gifted　mathematician　and　steel　baron　in　victoriar　england。　in　1870；　he　gave　theuniversity　锟�6；300　to　build　an　experimental　lab。

by　the　early　twentieth　century　it　was　known　that　atoms　were　made　of　parts鈥攖homson鈥檚discovery　of　the　electron　had　established　that鈥攂ut　it　wasn鈥檛　known　how　many　parts　therewere　or　how　they　fit　together　or　what　shape　they　took。　some　physicists　thought　that　atomsmight　be　cube　shaped；　because　cubes　can　be　packed　together　so　neatly　without　any　wastedspace。　the　more　general　view；　however；　was　that　an　atom　was　more　like　a　currant　bun　or　aplum　pudding：　a　dense；　solid　object　that　carried　a　positive　charge　but　that　was　studded　withnegatively　charged　electrons；　like　the　currants　in　a　currant　bun。

in　1910；　rutherford　（assisted　by　his　student　hans　geiger；　who　would　later　invent　theradiation　detector　that　bears　his　name）　fired　ionized　helium　atoms；　or　alpha　particles；　at　asheet　of　gold　foil。

2to　rutherford鈥檚　astonishment；　some　of　the　particles　bounced　back。　it　wasas　if；　he　said；　he　had　fired　a　fifteen…inch　shell　at　a　sheet　of　paper　and　it　rebounded　into　his　lap。

this　was　just　not　supposed　to　happen。　after　considerable　reflection　he　realized　there　could　beonly　one　possible　explanation：　the　particles　that　bounced　back　were　striking　something　smalland　dense　at　the　heart　of　the　atom；　while　the　other　particles　sailed　through　unimpeded。　anatom；　rutherford　realized；　was　mostly　empty　space；　with　a　very　dense　nucleus　at　the　center。

this　was　a　most　gratifying　discovery；　but　it　presented　one　immediate　problem。　by　all　the　lawsof　conventional　physics；　atoms　shouldn鈥檛　therefore　exist。

let　us　pause　for　a　moment　and　consider　the　structure　of　the　atom　as　we　know　it　now。　everyatom　is　made　from　three　kinds　of　elementary　particles：　protons；　which　have　a　positiveelectrical　charge；　electrons；　which　have　a　negative　electrical　charge；　and　neutrons；　which　haveno　charge。　protons　and　neutrons　are　packed　into　the　nucleus；　while　electrons　spin　aroundoutside。　the　number　of　protons　is　what　gives　an　atom　its　chemical　identity。　an　atom　with　oneproton　is　an　atom　of　hydrogen；　one　with　two　protons　is　helium；　with　three　protons　is　lithium；and　so　on　up　the　scale。　each　time　you　add　a　proton　you　get　a　new　element。　（because　thenumber　of　protons　in　an　atom　is　always　balanced　by　an　equal　number　of　electrons；　you　willsometimes　see　it　written　that　it　is　the　number　of　electrons　that　defines　an　element；　it　es　tothe　same　thing。　the　way　it　was　explained　to　me　is　that　protons　give　an　atom　its　identity；electrons　its　personality。）neutrons　don鈥檛　influence　an　atom鈥檚　identity；　but　they　do　add　to　its　mass。　the　number　ofneutrons　is　generally　about　the　same　as　the　number　of　protons；　but　they　can　vary　up　and　downslightly。　add　a　neutron　or　two　and　you　get　an　isotope。　the　terms　you　hear　in　reference　todating　techniques　in　archeology　refer　to　isotopes鈥攃arbon…14；　for　instance；　which　is　an　atomof　carbon　with　six　protons　and　eight　neutrons　（the　fourteen　being　the　sum　of　the　two）。

neutrons　and　protons　occupy　the　atom鈥檚　nucleus。　the　nucleus　of　an　atom　is　tiny鈥攐nly　onemillionth　of　a　billionth　of　the　full　volume　of　the　atom鈥攂ut　fantastically　dense；　since　itcontains　virtually　all　the　atom鈥檚　mass。　as　cropper　has　put　it；　if　an　atom　were　expanded　to　thesize　of　a　cathedral；　the　nucleus　would　be　only　about　the　size　of　a　fly鈥攂ut　a　fly　manythousands　of　times　heavier　than　the　cathedral。　it　was　this　spaciousness鈥攖his　resounding；unexpected　roominess鈥攖hat　had　rutherford　scratching　his　head　in　1910。

it　is　still　a　fairly　astounding　notion　to　consider　that　atoms　are　mostly　empty　space；　and　thatthe　solidity　we　experience　all　around　us　is　an　illusion。　when　two　objects　e　together　in　the2geiger　would　also　later　bee　a　loyal　nazi；　unhesitatingly　betraying　jewish　colleagues；　including　many　whohad　helped　him。

real　world鈥攂illiard　balls　are　most　often　used　for　illustration鈥攖hey　don鈥檛　actually　strike　eachother。　鈥渞ather；鈥潯�as　timothy　ferris　explains；　鈥渢he　negatively　charged　fields　of　the　two　ballsrepel　each　other　。　。　。　were　it　not　for　their　electrical　charges　they　could；　like　galaxies；　pass　rightthrough　each　other　unscathed。鈥潯�when　you　sit　in　a　chair；　you　are　not　actually　sitting　there；　butlevitating　above　it　at　a　height　of　one　angstrom　（a　hundred　millionth　of　a　centimeter）；　yourelectrons　and　its　electrons　implacably　opposed　to　any　closer　intimacy。

the　picture　that　nearly　everybody　has　in　mind　of　an　atom　is　of　an　electron　or　two　flyingaround　a　nucleus；　like　planets　orbiting　a　sun。　this　image　was　created　in　1904；　based　on　littlemore　than　clever　guesswork；　by　a　japanese　physicist　named　hantaro　nagaoka。　it　ispletely　wrong；　but　durable　just　the　same。　as　isaac　asimov　liked　to　note；　it　inspiredgenerations　of　science　fiction　writers　to　create　stories　of　worlds　within　worlds；　in　which　atomsbee　tiny　inhabited　solar　systems　or　our　solar　system　turns　out　to　be　merely　a　mote　in　somemuch　larger　scheme。　even　now　cern；　the　european　organization　for　nuclear　research；　usesnagaoka鈥檚　image　as　a　logo　on　its　website。　in　fact；　as　physicists　were　soon　to　realize；　electronsare　not　like　orbiting　planets　at　all；　but　more　like　the　blades　of　a　spinning　fan；　managing　to　fillevery　bit　of　space　in　their　orbits　simultaneously　（but　with　the　crucial　difference　that　the　bladesof　a　fan　only　seem　to　be　everywhere　at　once；　electrons　are　）。

needless　to　say；　very　little　of　this　was　understood　in　1910　or　for　many　years　afterward。

rutherford鈥檚　finding　presented　some　large　and　immediate　problems；　not　least　that　no　electronshould　be　able　to　orbit　a　nucleus　without　crashing。　conventional　electrodynamic　theorydemanded　that　a　flying　electron　should　very　quickly　run　out　of　energy鈥攊n　only　an　instant　orso鈥攁nd　spiral　into　the　nucleus；　with　disastrous　consequences　for　both。　there　was　also　theproblem　of　how　protons　with　their　positive　charges　could　bundle　together　inside　the　nucleuswithout　blowing　themselves　and　the　rest　of　the　atom　apart。　clearly　whatever　was　going　ondown　there　in　the　world　of　the　very　small　was　not　governed　by　the　laws　that　applied　in　themacro　world　where　our　expectations　reside。

as　physicists　began　to　delve　into　this　subatomic　realm；　they　realized　that　it　wasn鈥檛　merelydifferent　from　anything　we　knew；　but　different　from　anything　ever　imagined。　鈥渂ecauseatomic　behavior　is　so　unlike　ordinary　experience；鈥潯�richard　feynman　once　observed；　鈥渋t　isvery　difficult　to　get　used　to　and　it　appears　peculiar　and　mysterious　to　everyone；　both　to　thenovice　and　to　the　experienced　physicist。鈥潯�when　feynman　made　that　ment；　physicists　hadhad　half　a　century　to　adjust　to　the　strangeness　of　atomic　behavior。　so　think　how　it　must　havefelt　to　rutherford　and　his　colleagues　in　the　early　1910s　when　it　was　all　brand　new。

one　of　the　people　working　with　rutherford　was　a　mild　and　affable　young　dane　namedniels　bohr。　in　1913；　while　puzzling　over　the　structure　of　the　atom；　bohr　had　an　idea　soexciting　that　he　postponed　his　honeymoon　to　write　what　became　a　landmark　paper。　becausephysicists　couldn鈥檛　see　anything　so　small　as　an　atom；　they　had　to　try　to　work　out　its　structurefrom　how　it　behaved　when　they　did　things　to　it；　as　rutherford　had　done　by　firing　alphaparticles　at　foil。　sometimes；　not　surprisingly；　the　results　of　these　experiments　were　puzzling。

one　puzzle　that　had　been　around　for　a　long　time　had　to　do　with　spectrum　readings　of　thewavelengths　of　hydrogen。　these　produced　patterns　showing　that　hydrogen　atoms　emittedenergy　at　certain　wavelengths　but　not　others。　it　was　rather　as　if　someone　under　surveillancekept　turning　up　at　particular　locations　but　was　never　observed　traveling　between　them。　no　onecould　understand　why　this　should　be。

it　was　while　puzzling　over　this　problem　that　bohr　was　struck　by　a　solution　and　dashed　offhis　famous　paper。　called　鈥渙n　the　constitutions　of　atoms　and　molecules；鈥潯�the　paper　explainedhow　electrons　could　keep　from　falling　into　the　nucleus　by　suggesting　that　they　could　occupyonly　certain　well…defined　orbits。　according　to　the　new　theory；　an　electron　moving　betweenorbits　would　disappear　from　one　and　reappear　instantaneously　in　another　without　visiting　thespace　between。　this　idea鈥攖he　famous　鈥渜uantum　leap鈥濃�攊s　of　course　utterly　strange；　but　itwas　too　good　not　to　be　true。　it　not　only　kept　electrons　from　spiraling　catastrophically　into　thenucleus；　it　also　explained　hydrogen鈥檚　bewildering　wavelengths。　the　electrons　only　appearedin　certain　orbits　because　they　only　existed　in　certain　orbits。　it　was　a　dazzling　insight；　and　itwon　bohr　the　1922　nobel　prize　in　physics；　the　year　after　einstein　received　his。

meanwhile　the　tireless　rutherford；　now　back　at　cambridge　as　j。　j。　thomson鈥檚　successor　ashead　of　the　cavendish　laboratory；　came　up　with　a　model　that　explained　why　the　nuclei　didn鈥檛blow　up。　he　saw　that　they　must　be　offset　by　some　type　of　neutralizing　particles；　which　hecalled　neutrons。　the　idea　was　simple　and　appealing；　but　not　easy　to　prove。　rutherford鈥檚associate；　james　chadwick；　devoted　eleven　intensive　years　to　hunting　for　neutrons　beforefinally　succeeding　in　1932。　he；　too；　was　awarded　with　a　nobel　prize　in　physics；　in　1935。　asboorse　and　his　colleagues　point　out　in　their　history　of　the　subject；　the　delay　in　discovery　wasprobably　a　very　good　thing　as　mastery　of　the　neutron　was　essential　to　the　development　of　theatomic　bomb。　（because　neutrons　have　no　charge；　they　aren鈥檛　repelled　by　the　electrical　fields　atthe　heart　of　an　atom　and　thus　could　be　fired　like　tiny　torpedoes　into　an　atomic　nucleus；　settingoff　the　destructive　process　known　as　fission。）　had　the　neutron　been　isolated　in　the　1920s；　theynote；　it　is　鈥渧ery　likely　the　atomic　bomb　would　have　been　developed　first　in　europe；undoubtedly　by　the　germans。鈥�

as　it　was；　the　europeans　had　their　hands　full　trying　to　understand　the　strange　behavior　ofthe　electron。　the　principal　problem　they　faced　was　that　the　electron　sometimes　behaved　like　aparticle　and　sometimes　like　a　wave。　this　impossible　duality　drove　physicists　nearly　mad。　forthe　next　decade　all　across　europe　they　furiously　thought　and　scribbled　and　offered　petinghypotheses。　in　france；　prince　louis…victor　de　broglie；　the　scion　of　a　ducal　family；　found　thatcertain　anomalies　in　the　behavior　of　electrons　disappeared　when　one　regarded　them　as　waves。

the　observation　excited　the　attention　of　the　austrian　erwin　schr？dinger；　who　made　some　deftrefinements　and　devised　a　handy　system　called　wave　mechanics。　at　almost　the　same　time　thegerman　physicist　werner　heisenberg　came　up　with　a　peting　theory　called　matrixmechanics。　this　was　so　mathematically　plex　that　hardly　anyon