°®°®Ð¡ËµÍø > ÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > ¹ÉƱÆÚ»õÍ»ÆƼ¼Êõ·ÖÎö(Ó¢ÎÄÔ­°æ) >

µÚ21ÕÂ

¹ÉƱÆÚ»õÍ»ÆƼ¼Êõ·ÖÎö(Ó¢ÎÄÔ­°æ)-µÚ21ÕÂ

С˵£º ¹ÉƱÆÚ»õÍ»ÆƼ¼Êõ·ÖÎö(Ó¢ÎÄÔ­°æ) ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ3500×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



pect¡¡the¡¡same¡¡rundown¡¡that¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£had¡¡experienced¡¡between¡¡1929¡¡and¡¡1932¡£¡¡The¡¡American¡¡market¡¡had¡¡run¡¡up¡¡95¡¡points¡£in¡¡ninety¡­five¡¡days¡£to¡¡top¡¡out¡¡on¡¡September¡¡3£»¡¡1929£»¡¡then¡¡it¡¡ran¡¡down¡¡for¡¡a¡¡period¡¡of¡¡1£»039¡¡days¡£to¡¡July¡¡8£»¡¡1932¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡what¡¡I¡¡had¡¡learned¡¡from¡¡Gann's¡£book£»¡¡when¡¡the¡¡Japanese¡¡market¡¡topped¡¡on¡¡December¡¡27£»¡¡1989£»¡¡it¡¡seemed¡¡to¡¡make¡¡sense¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Japanese¡¡market¡¡would¡¡not¡¡bottom¡¡out¡¡until¡¡sometime¡¡around¡¡October¡¡31£»¡¡1992¡£¡¡
I¡¡did¡¡not¡¡trade¡¡either¡¡side¡¡of¡¡my¡¡call¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Nikkei¡¡225¡¡Stock¡£Average¡£¡¡But¡¡I¡¡overlaid¡¡the¡¡1929¡¡weekly¡¡chart¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Dow¡¡Jones¡£Industrial¡¡Average¡¡with¡¡the¡¡1989¡¡chart¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Nikkei£»¡¡shown¡¡in¡¡Figure¡¡6¡£6¡£¡¡In¡¡real¡¡time£»¡¡the¡¡Nikkei¡¡ran¡¡down¡¡for¡¡966¡¡days¡£to¡¡bottom¡¡out¡¡on¡¡August¡¡19£»¡¡1992£»¡¡whereas¡£the¡¡Dow¡¡ran¡¡down¡¡for¡¡1£»039¡¡days¡£in¡¡1932¡£¡¡The¡¡relevance¡¡of¡¡all¡¡this¡£bees¡£apparent¡¡when¡¡you¡¡look¡¡at¡¡the¡¡overlaid¡¡charts¡£¡¡
The¡¡Theory¡¡in¡¡Practice¡¡
Let's¡£take¡¡this¡£theory¡¡a¡¡little¡¡further¡¡and¡¡see¡¡what¡¡economic¡£advantages¡£we¡¡can¡¡derive¡¡from¡¡some¡¡of¡¡this¡£knowledge¡£¡¡From¡¡1998£»¡¡under¡¡doctor¡¯s¡£orders£»¡¡I¡¡needed¡¡to¡¡ration¡¡my¡¡time¡¡and¡¡spend¡¡less¡£time¡¡working¡£¡¡I¡¡had¡¡been¡¡publishing¡¡forecasts¡¡since¡¡1988¡£¡¡Often¡¡this¡£included¡¡drawing¡¡up¡¡road¡¡maps¡£for¡¡the¡¡stock¡£market¡£¡¡Now¡¡that¡¡I¡¡had¡¡some¡¡time¡¡on¡¡my¡£hands£»¡¡I¡¡decided¡¡to¡¡focus¡£on¡¡an¡¡aspect¡¡that¡¡had¡¡interested¡¡me¡ªan¡¡analysis¡£of¡¡cycles¡£in¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡the¡¡twentieth¡¡century¡ªusing¡¡my¡¡own¡¡methods¡£and¡¡in¡¡my¡¡own¡¡time¡£¡¡The¡¡results¡¡are¡¡astounding¡£¡¡
I¡¡participated¡¡in¡¡a¡¡worldwide¡¡traders¡£teleconference¡¡on¡¡September¡¡7£»¡¡2002£»¡¡which¡¡involved¡¡approximately¡¡500¡¡traders¡£¡¡I¡¡spent¡¡about¡¡an¡¡hour¡¡and¡¡a¡¡half¡¡answering¡¡questions¡£¡¡Early¡¡in¡¡the¡¡conference£»¡¡I¡¡was¡£asked¡¡by¡¡one¡¡trader¡¡where¡¡I¡¡believed¡¡the¡¡next¡¡pressure¡¡point¡¡would¡¡be¡¡on¡¡the¡¡road¡¡map¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡pressure¡¡point¡¡I¡¡mentioned¡¡was¡£July¡¡28£»¡¡2004¡£¡¡I¡¡also¡¡said¡¡there¡¡was¡£a¡¡pressure¡¡point¡¡somewhere¡¡around¡¡August¡¡2¡­5£»¡¡2004¡£¡¡I¡¡based¡¡this¡£on¡¡historical¡¡war¡¡dates¡£and¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡2001¡¡was¡£an¡¡election¡¡year¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡
In¡¡November¡¡2002¡¡and¡¡again¡¡in¡¡2003£»¡¡I¡¡was¡£guest¡¡speaker¡¡at¡¡the¡¡annual¡¡traders'¡¡conference¡¡run¡¡in¡¡Sydney¡¡by¡¡Hubb¡¡Limited£»¡¡a¡¡trading¡¡software¡¡developer¡¡who¡¡was¡£granted¡¡a¡¡license¡¡to¡¡sell¡¡my¡¡courses¡£after¡¡I¡¡retired¡¡in¡¡2001¡£¡¡At¡¡these¡¡seminars£»¡¡I¡¡mentioned¡¡the¡¡date¡¡of¡¡May¡¡17£»¡¡2004£»¡¡as¡£a¡¡major¡¡pressure¡¡point¡¡on¡¡the¡¡stock¡£market¡¡and¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡this¡£and¡¡the¡¡previous¡£pressure¡¡points¡£I'd¡¡mentioned¡¡as¡£¡°war¡¡dates¡±¡£¡¡This¡£took¡¡place¡¡years¡£after¡¡I¡¡had¡¡pleted¡¡my¡¡final¡¡Safety¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Market¡¡trading¡¡seminar£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡dates¡£were¡¡based¡¡on¡¡the¡¡research¡¡I¡¡wasnducting¡¡on¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡the¡¡twentieth¡¡century¡£¡¡
The¡¡first¡¡week¡£of¡¡August¡¡has¡£often¡¡been¡¡a¡¡critical¡¡day¡¡in¡¡world¡¡history¡ªand¡¡so¡¡it¡¡has¡¡been¡¡a¡¡significant¡¡week¡£for¡¡the¡¡stock¡¡market¡£¡¡On¡¡July¡¡31£»¡¡1914£»¡¡the¡¡London¡¡and¡¡New¡¡York¡¡stock¡£exchanges¡£closed¡¡to¡¡avoid¡¡panic¡£trading¡£¡¡That¡¡was¡£almost¡¡the¡¡case¡¡again¡¡in¡¡2001£»¡¡when¡¡an¡¡immediate¡¡security¡¡clampdown¡¡occurred¡¡in¡¡New¡¡York¡£and¡¡Washington¡¡on¡¡August¡¡2£»¡¡2004¡£¡¡The¡¡buildings¡£affected¡¡were¡¡the¡¡New¡¡York¡£Stock¡£Exchange¡¡and¡¡Citigroup¡¡Center¡¡in¡¡New¡¡York¡£as¡£well¡¡as¡£the¡¡World¡¡Bank¡£and¡¡the¡¡International¡¡Monetary¡¡Fund¡¡in¡¡Washington¡£¡¡Britain¡¡declared¡¡war¡¡on¡¡Germany¡¡on¡¡Tuesday£»¡¡August¡¡4£»¡¡1914¡£¡¡The¡¡United¡¡States¡¡dropped¡¡the¡¡first¡¡atomic¡£bomb¡¡on¡¡Japan¡¡on¡¡August¡¡6£»¡¡1945¡£¡¡£¨It¡¡had¡¡been¡¡scheduled¡¡to¡¡be¡¡dropped¡¡on¡¡August¡¡3¡££©¡¡On¡¡August¡¡1£»¡¡1941£»¡¡President¡¡Roosevelt¡¡stopped¡¡the¡¡export¡¡of¡¡oil¡¡and¡¡aviation¡¡fuel¡¡from¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£to¡¡Japan¡£¡¡Japan¡¡had¡¡the¡¡choice¡¡of¡¡either¡¡changing¡¡its¡£foreign¡¡policy¡¡or¡¡gaining¡¡access¡£to¡¡the¡¡East¡¡Indies¡£oil¡¡by¡¡force¡£¡¡On¡¡August¡¡2¡¡and¡¡5£»¡¡1964£»¡¡two¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡destroyers¡£were¡¡attacked¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Gulf¡¡of¡¡Tonkin£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡in¡¡turn¡¡sank¡£two¡¡North¡¡Vietnamese¡¡patrol¡¡boats¡ªleading¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£into¡¡the¡¡Vietnam¡¡War¡£¡¡
To¡¡fully¡¡illustrate¡¡the¡¡scope¡¡of¡¡the¡¡pattern£»¡¡I¡¡would¡¡need¡¡to¡¡trace¡¡early¡­August¡¡events¡£through¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡century¡¡and¡¡give¡¡you¡¡the¡¡time¡¡frames£»¡¡but¡¡I¡¡think¡£I've¡¡made¡¡the¡¡point¡£¡¡Here¡¡is¡£the¡¡main¡¡thrust£º¡¡Britain¡¡entered¡¡World¡¡War¡¡I¡¡
**********************¡¡
Page¡¡131¡¡
**********************¡¡

CHAPTER¡¡7¡¡
Options¡­Based¡¡Technical¡£Indicators¡¡for¡¡Stock¡¡Trading¡¡
BERNIE¡¡SCHAEFFER¡¡
Equity¡¡options¡£have¡¡e¡¡a¡¡long¡¡way¡¡since¡¡they¡¡were¡¡first¡¡listed¡¡on¡¡exchanges¡£in¡¡1973¡£¡¡Beyond¡¡the¡¡explosive¡¡growth¡¡in¡¡the¡¡volume¡¡of¡¡options¡£trading¡¡during¡¡this¡£period£»¡¡which¡¡speaks¡£for¡¡itself£»¡¡options¡£have¡¡bee¡¡a¡¡risk¡­management¡¡tool¡¡as¡£well¡¡as¡£a¡¡tool¡¡for¡¡speculation¡¡for¡¡a¡¡broad¡¡spectrum¡¡of¡¡market¡¡players£»¡¡from¡¡modestly¡¡capitalized¡¡individual¡¡investors¡£to¡¡hedge¡¡funds¡£¡¡
In¡¡basic¡£terms£»¡¡the¡¡world¡¡of¡¡listed¡¡optionsnsists¡£of¡¡call¡¡options¡£and¡¡put¡¡options¡£¡¡The¡¡buyer¡¡of¡¡an¡¡equity¡¡call¡¡option¡¡has¡£the¡¡right¡¡but¡¡not¡¡the¡¡obligation¡¡to¡¡buy¡¡shares¡£of¡¡a¡¡pany£»¡¡referred¡¡to¡¡as¡£the¡¡underlying¡¡stork£»¡¡at¡¡a¡¡specified¡¡price¡¡£¨called¡¡the¡¡strike¡¡price£©¡¡for¡¡a¡¡specific¡£period¡¡of¡¡time£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡option¡¡¡°expires¡±¡£¡¡The¡¡call¡¡option¡¡buyers¡£are¡¡bullish¡ªthey're¡¡hoping¡¡to¡¡profit¡¡from¡¡a¡¡rise¡¡in¡¡the¡¡stock¡£price¡¡over¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡the¡¡option¡£¡¡

Why¡¡Options£¿¡¡
Why¡¡would¡¡a¡¡bullish¡¡investor¡¡choose¡¡to¡¡pay¡¡for¡¡a¡¡call¡¡option¡¡with¡¡a¡¡limited¡¡life¡¡instead¡¡of¡¡buying¡¡the¡¡underlying¡¡stock£¿¡¡The¡¡short¡¡answer¡¡is¡£leverage¡ªthe¡¡ability¡¡to¡¡participate¡¡in¡¡the¡¡upside¡¡movement¡¡in¡¡the¡¡underlying¡¡stock¡£for¡¡a¡¡relatively¡¡small¡¡initial¡¡investment¡£¡¡The¡¡price¡¡of¡¡a¡¡call¡¡option¡¡is¡£most¡¡dependent¡¡on¡¡the¡¡price¡¡of¡¡the¡¡underlying¡¡stock¡£relative¡¡to¡¡the¡¡strike¡¡price£»¡¡the¡¡stock's¡£volatility£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡time¡¡remaining¡¡until¡¡the¡¡option¡¡expires¡£¡¡But¡¡in¡¡all¡¡cases£»¡¡the¡¡call¡¡option¡¡price¡¡will¡¡be¡¡a¡¡fraction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stock¡£price£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡many¡¡cases£»¡¡this¡¡fraction¡¡will¡¡be¡¡very¡¡small¡¡indeed¡£¡¡
To¡¡illustrate£»¡¡lets¡£assume¡¡Stock¡¡A£»¡¡which¡¡does¡£not¡¡pay¡¡a¡¡dividend£»¡¡is¡£currently¡¡trading¡¡for¡¡50¡¡and¡¡an¡¡investor¡¡is¡£expecting¡¡the¡¡stock¡£to¡¡move¡¡to¡¡60¡¡during¡¡the¡¡next¡¡three¡¡months¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡annualized¡¡volatility¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stock¡¡is¡£25¡¡percent¡ªtypical¡¡of¡¡many¡¡of¡¡the¡¡blue¡¡chips¡ªa¡¡three¡­month¡¡call¡¡option¡¡with¡¡a¡¡strike¡¡price¡¡of¡¡50¡¡will¡¡trade¡¡for¡¡about¡¡5¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡share¡¡price£»¡¡or¡¡2¡£50¡¡in¡¡this¡£case¡£¡¡If¡¡the¡¡stock¡£should¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡reach¡¡60¡¡by¡¡the¡¡time¡¡this¡£call¡¡option¡¡expires¡£in¡¡three¡¡months£»¡¡the¡¡50¡­strike¡¡call¡¡option¡¡will¡¡have¡¡a¡¡value¡¡of¡¡10¡¡in¡¡the¡¡listed¡¡options¡£market¡£¡¡
So£»¡¡in¡¡this¡£case£»¡¡the¡¡call¡¡option¡¡will¡¡have¡¡quadrupled¡¡from¡¡2¡£50¡¡to¡¡10¡¡on¡¡a¡¡move¡¡by¡£the¡¡underlying¡¡from¡¡50¡¡to¡¡60£»¡¡and¡¡thus¡£a¡¡gain¡¡of¡¡300¡¡percent¡¡could¡¡have¡¡been¡¡realized¡¡by¡¡the¡¡option¡¡buyer¡¡on¡¡just¡¡a¡¡20¡¡percent¡¡gain¡¡in¡¡the¡¡stock¡£¡¡And¡¡the¡¡leverage¡¡in¡¡this¡£case¡¡would¡¡have¡¡been¡¡15¡¡to¡¡1¡¡£¨300¡¡percent/20¡¡percent£©¡£¡¡Put¡¡another¡¡way£»¡¡the¡¡option¡¡holder¡¡achieved¡¡a¡¡profit¡¡of¡¡7¡£50¡¡with¡¡an¡¡investment¡¡of¡¡just¡¡2¡£50£»¡¡whereas¡£the¡¡10¡¡gain¡¡realized¡¡by¡¡the¡¡stock¡£holder¡¡required¡¡a¡¡50¡¡investment¡£¡¡
Needless¡£to¡¡say£»¡¡the¡¡scenario¡¡described¡¡above¡¡was¡£on¡¡the¡¡best¡­case¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡spectrum¡¡for¡¡the¡¡call¡¡option¡¡buyer¡£¡¡Note£»¡¡for¡¡example£»¡¡that¡¡if¡¡the¡¡stock¡£does¡£not¡¡rise¡¡above¡¡50¡¡during¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡the¡¡option¡¡and¡¡the¡¡position¡¡is¡£held¡¡until¡¡expiration£»¡¡the¡¡call¡¡buyer¡¡will¡¡lose¡¡100¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡his¡£investment¡£¡¡And¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡on¡­the¡­money¡¡option¡ªwhen¡¡the¡¡stock¡£price¡¡is¡£equal¡¡to¡¡the¡¡strike¡¡price¡ªsuch¡¡total¡¡losses¡£can¡¡be¡¡expected¡¡to¡¡occur¡¡50¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡time¡£¡¡
Based¡¡on¡¡this¡£quick¡£risk¡­reward¡¡profile£»¡¡one¡¡can¡¡reasonably¡¡conclude¡¡that¡¡call¡¡option¡¡buyers¡££¨those¡¡who¡¡are¡¡said¡¡to¡¡have¡¡long¡¡call¡­option¡¡positions£©¡¡are¡¡rather¡¡aggressively¡¡bullish¡¡in¡¡the¡¡pursuit¡¡of¡¡leveraged¡¡profits¡ªbullish¡¡enough¡¡to¡¡be¡¡risking¡¡a¡¡total¡¡loss¡£of¡¡their¡¡investment¡¡if¡¡they're¡¡wrong¡£¡¡
The¡¡buyer¡¡of¡¡an¡¡equity¡¡put¡¡option£»¡¡however£»¡¡has¡£the¡¡right¡¡but¡¡not¡¡the¡¡obligation¡¡to¡¡sell¡¡a¡¡stock¡£at¡¡a¡¡specified¡¡price¡¡£¨the¡¡strike¡¡price£©¡¡for¡¡a¡¡specific¡£period¡¡£¨at¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡which¡¡the¡¡option¡¡expires£©¡£¡¡The¡¡put¡¡option¡¡buyer¡¡is¡£as¡£aggressively¡¡bearish¡¡as¡£the¡¡call¡¡option¡¡buyer¡¡is¡£aggressively¡¡bullish¡£¡¡
So¡¡in¡¡its¡£purest¡¡form£»¡¡the¡¡options¡£world¡¡consists¡£of¡¡two¡¡constituencies£º¡¡the¡¡aggressively¡£bullish¡¡call¡¡option¡¡buyer¡¡and¡¡the¡¡aggressively¡£bearish¡¡put¡¡option¡¡buyer¡£¡¡In¡¡addition£»¡¡the¡¡listed¡¡options¡£market¡¡provides¡£a¡¡treasure¡¡trove¡¡of¡¡information¡¡about¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡call¡¡and¡¡put¡¡buyers¡£in¡¡each¡¡of¡¡the¡¡thousands¡£of¡¡underlying¡¡stocks¡£on¡¡which¡¡options¡£are¡¡traded¡£¡¡Trading¡¡volume¡¡data¡¡are¡¡available¡¡for¡¡calls¡£and¡¡for¡¡puts£»¡¡as¡£well¡¡as¡£option¡¡open¡¡interest£»¡¡which¡¡represents¡£the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡option¡¡contracts¡£open¡¡at¡¡any¡¡time¡£¡¡
Gauging¡£Investor¡¡Sentiment¡¡
It¡¡should¡¡be¡¡no¡¡surprise£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡that¡¡technical¡¡and¡¡quantitative¡¡analysts¡£have¡¡made¡¡ongoing¡¡efforts¡£over¡¡the¡¡years¡£to¡¡measure¡¡the¡¡relative¡¡intensity¡¡of¡¡put¡¡and¡¡call¡¡activity¡¡as¡¡a¡¡gauge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sentiment¡¡of¡¡aggressive¡¡investors¡£¡¡Stocks¡£on¡¡which¡¡these¡¡investors¡£are¡¡very¡£bullish¡ªas¡£indicated¡¡by¡¡greater¡¡call¡¡activity¡¡than¡¡put¡¡activity¡ªcould¡¡be¡¡deemed¡¡byntrarians¡¡to¡¡be¡¡vulnerable¡£¡¡An¡¡excess¡£of¡¡bullish¡¡options¡£sentiment¡¡could¡¡be¡¡an¡¡indication¡¡of¡¡investor¡¡exuberance¡¡and¡¡overmitment£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡resulting¡¡dearth¡¡of¡¡sideline¡¡buying¡¡power¡¡could¡¡pave¡¡the¡¡way¡¡for¡¡a¡¡major¡¡pullback¡£¡¡Similarly£»¡¡stocks¡£on¡¡which¡¡investors¡£are¡¡very¡£bearish¡ªas¡£indicated¡¡by¡¡greater¡¡put¡¡activity¡¡than¡¡call¡¡activity¡ªcould¡¡have¡¡significant¡¡upside¡¡potential¡£¡¡An¡¡excess¡£of¡¡bearish¡¡options¡£sentiment¡¡could¡¡indicate¡¡investor¡¡pessimism¡¡and¡¡capitulation£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡resulting¡¡buildup¡¡of¡¡sideline¡¡buying¡¡power¡¡could¡¡pave¡¡the¡¡way¡£for¡¡a¡¡major¡¡rally¡£¡¡
Surprisingly£»¡¡the¡¡focus¡¡on¡¡put¡¡and¡¡call¡¡option¡¡activity¡¡over¡¡the¡¡years¡£has¡£been¡¡pretty¡¡well¡¡restricted¡¡to£º¡¡
1¡£¡¡
Aggregate¡¡options¡£data¡¡across¡£all¡¡equities¡£rather¡¡than¡¡an¡¡equity¡­by¡­equity¡£analysis¡£¡¡A¡¡seriesmonly¡¡quoted¡¡by¡¡analysts¡£is¡£the¡¡¡°CBOE¡¡Equity¡¡Put/Call¡¡ratio¡±¡¡which¡¡represents¡£the¡¡trading¡¡volume¡¡of¡¡all¡¡puts¡¡and¡¡calls¡¡listed¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Chicago¡¡Board¡¡Options¡¡Exchange¡£¡¡This¡£aggregation¡¡of¡¡equity¡¡options¡¡data¡¡may¡¡have¡¡made¡¡sense¡¡decades¡£ago£»¡¡when¡¡few¡¡individual¡¡equities¡£had¡¡robust¡¡markets¡£in¡¡their¡¡options¡£¡¡But¡¡these¡¡days¡£there¡¡are¡¡many¡¡equities¡£with¡¡options¡£that¡¡trade¡¡thousands¡£of¡¡contracts¡£each¡¡day¡¡and¡¡with¡¡option¡¡open¡¡interest¡¡equivalent¡¡to¡¡millions¡£of¡¡shares¡£of¡¡stock¡£¡¡

2¡£¡¡
Option¡¡volume£»¡¡as¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡open¡¡interest¡£¡¡Option¡¡open¡¡interest¡¡is¡£a¡¡much¡¡more¡¡stable¡¡series¡£than¡¡option¡¡volume¡£¡¡Option¡¡volume¡¡can¡¡vary¡¡very¡¡significantly¡¡from¡¡day¡¡to¡¡day£»¡¡whereas¡£open¡¡interest¡¡adjusts¡£incrementally¡¡each¡¡day¡¡based¡¡on¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡positions¡¡that¡¡were¡¡opened¡¡or¡¡closed¡¡the¡¡day¡¡before¡£¡¡In¡¡addition£»¡¡option¡¡volume¡¡can¡¡be¡¡subject¡¡to¡¡all¡¡manner¡¡of¡¡intraday¡¡¡¨noise¡¨£»¡¡including¡¡the¡¡activities¡£of¡¡day¡¡traders¡¡who¡¡hold¡¡no¡¡position¡¡at¡¡the¡¡end¡¡of¡¡the¡¡day¡£¡¡


Schaeffer's¡¡Open¡£Interest¡¡Ratio¡¡
Schaeffer's¡£Investment¡¡Research¡¡has¡£attacked¡¡the¡¡deficiencies¡£of¡¡traditional¡¡put/call¡¡ratio¡¡analysis¡£on¡¡each¡¡of¡¡these¡¡two¡¡fronts¡£by¡¡developing¡¡a¡¡ratio¡¡of¡¡put¡¡open¡¡interest¡¡to¡¡call¡¡open¡¡interest¡¡for¡¡even¡¡optionable¡¡stock¡£¡¡This¡£ratio¡¡is¡£referred¡¡to¡¡as¡£the¡¡SOIR¡¡£¨Schaeffer's¡¡Open¡¡Interest¡¡Ratio£©£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡is¡£updated¡¡daily¡¡in¡¡the¡¡data¡¡presented¡¡on¡¡SchaeffersResearch£»¡¡as¡£well¡¡as¡£for¡¡the¡¡pany's¡£internal¡¡analysis¡£¡¡A¡¡graph¡¡of¡¡the¡¡SOIR¡¡can¡¡tell¡¡a¡¡very¡£interesting¡¡story¡¡of¡¡the¡¡option¡¡trader¡¡sentiment¡¡toward¡¡a¡¡particular¡¡equity£»¡¡and¡¡this¡£unique¡¡perspective¡¡can¡¡add¡¡considerable¡¡value¡¡to¡¡an¡¡analysis¡£of¡¡a¡¡stock's¡£technical¡¡picture¡£¡¡Before¡¡delving¡¡into¡¡some¡¡pelling¡¡examples¡£of¡¡SOIR¡¡analysis£»¡¡consider¡¡the¡¡potential¡¡pitfalls¡£of¡¡this¡£approach¡£¡¡
Again£»¡¡in¡¡its¡£purest¡¡form¡¡the¡¡options¡£world¡¡consists¡£of¡¡two¡¡constituencies£º¡¡the¡¡aggressively¡¡bullish¡¡call¡¡option¡¡buyer¡¡and¡¡the¡¡aggressively¡¡bearish¡¡put¡¡option¡¡buyer¡£¡¡For¡¡purposes¡£of¡¡maximizing¡¡the¡¡value¡¡to¡¡contrarians¡£of¡¡put/call¡¡ratio¡¡analysis£»¡¡there¡¡would¡¡be¡¡another¡¡element¡¡to¡¡this¡£¡¨purity£»¡¨¡¡namely£»¡¡the¡¡participants¡£in¡¡the¡¡options

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ