list1-第15章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！





To　the　extension　of　the　foreign　trade　and　the　promotion　of



fisheries　he　devoted　special　attention。　He　re…established　the　trade



with　the　Levant；　enlarged　that　with　the　colonies；　and　opened　up　a



trade　with　the　North。　Into　all　branches　of　the　administration　he



introduced　the　most　stringent　economy　and　perfect　order。　At　his



death　France　possessed　50；000　looms　engaged　in　the　manufacture　of



woollens；　she　produced　annually　silk　manufactures　to　the　value　of



50　millions　of　francs。　The　State　revenues　had　increased　by　28



millions　of　francs。　The　kingdom　was　in　possession　of　flourishing



fisheries；　of　an　extensive　mercantile　marine；　and　a　powerful



navy。（1*）



　　　　A　century　later；　the　economists　have　sharply　censured　Colbert；



and　maintained　that　this　statesman　had　been　anxious　to　promote　the



interests　of　manufactures　at　the　expense　of　agriculture：　a　reproach



which　proves　nothing　more　than　that　these　authorities　were



themselves　incapable　of　appreciating　the　nature　of　manufacturing



industry。（2*）



　　　　If；　however；　Colbert　was　in　error　in　opposing　periodical



obstacles　to　the　exportation　of　raw　materials；　yet　by　fostering　the



growth　and　progress　of　native　industries　he　so　greatly　increased



the　demand　for　agricultural　produce　that　he　gave　the　agricultural



interest　tenfold　compensation　for　any　injury　which　he　caused　to　it



by　the　above…named　obstacles。　If；　contrary　to　the　dictates　of



enlightened　statesmanship；　he　prescribed　new　processes　of



manufacture；　and　compelled　the　manufacturers　by　penal　enactments　to



adopt　them；　it　should　be　borne　in　mind　that　these　processes　were



the　best　and　the　most　profitable　known　in　his　day；　and　that　he　had



to　deal　with　a　people　which；　sunk　into　the　utmost　apathy　by　reason



of　a　long　despotic　rule；　resisted　every　innovation　even　though　it



was　an　improvement。



　　　　The　reproach；　however；　that　France　had　lost　a　large　portion　of



her　native　industry　through　Colbert's　protective　system；　could　be



levelled　against　Colbert　only　by　that　school　which　utterly　ignored



the　revocation　of　the　Edict　of　Nantes　with　its　disastrous



consequences。　In　consequence　of　these　deplorable　measures；　in　the



course　of　three　years　after　Colbert's　death　half　a　million　of　the



most　industrious；　skilful；　and　thriving　inhabitants　of　France　were



banished；　who；　consequently；　to　the　double　injury　of　France　which



they　had　enriched；　transplanted　their　industry　and　their　capital　to



Switzerland；　to　every　Protestant　country　in　Germany；　especially　to



Prussia；　as　also　to　Holland　and　England。　Thus　the　intrigues　of　a



bigoted　courtesan　ruined　in　three　years　the　able　and　gifted　work　of



a　whole　generation；　and　cast　France　back　again　into　its　previous



state　of　apathy；　while　England；　under　the　aegis　of　her



Constitution；　and　invigorated　by　a　Revolution　which　called　forth



all　the　energies　of　the　nation；　was　prosecuting　with　increasing



ardour　and　without　intermission　the　work　commenced　by　Elizabeth　and



her　predecessors。



　　　　The　melancholy　condition　to　which　the　industry　and　the　finances



of　France　had　been　reduced　by　a　long　course　of　misgovernment；　and



the　spectacle　of　the　great　prosperity　of　England；　aroused　the



emulation　of　French　statesmen　shortly　before　the　French　Revolution。



Infatuated　with　the　hollow　theory　of　the　economists；　they　looked



for　a　remedy；　in　opposition　to　Colbert's　policy；　in　the



establishment　of　free　trade。　It　was　thought　that　the　prosperity　of



the　country　could　be　restored　at　one　blow　if　a　better　market　were



provided　for　French　wines　and　brandies　in　England；　at　the　cost　of



permitting　the　importation　of　English　manufactures　upon　easy　terms



（a　twelve　per　cent　duty）。　England；　delighted　at　the　proposal；



willingly　granted　to　the　French　a　second　edition　of　the　Methuen



Treaty；　in　the　shape　of　the　so…called　Eden　Treaty　of　1786；　a　copy



which　was　soon　followed　by　results　not　less　ruinous　than　those



produced　by　the　Portuguese　original。



　　　　The　English；　accustomed　to　the　strong　wines　of　the　Peninsula；



did　not　increase　their　consumption　to　the　extent　which　had　been



expected；　whilst　the　French　perceived　with　horror　that　all　they　had



to　offer　the　English　were　simply　fashions　and　fancy　articles；　the



total　value　of　which　was　insignificant　：　whereas　the　English



manufacturers；　in　all　articles　of　prime　necessity；　the　total　amount



of　which　was　enormous；　could　greatly　surpass　the　French



manufacturers　in　cheapness　of　prices；　as　well　as　in　quality　of



their　goods；　and　in　granting　of　credit。　When；　after　a　brief



competition；　the　French　manufacturers　were　brought　to　the　brink　of



ruin；　while　French　wine…growers　had　gained　but　little；　then　the



French　Government　sought　to　arrest　the　progress　of　this　ruin　by



terminating　the　treaty；　but　only　acquired　the　conviction　that　it　is



much　easier　to　ruin　flourishing　manufactories　in　a　few　years　than



to　revive　ruined　manufactories　in　a　whole　generation。　English



competition　had　engendered　a　taste　for　English　goods　in　France；　the



consequence　of　which　was　an　extensive　and　long…continued　contraband



trade　which　it　was　difficult　to　suppress。　Meanwhile　it　was　not　so



difficult　for　the　English；　after　the　termination　of　the　treaty；　to



accustom　their　palates　again　to　the　wines　of　the　Peninsula。



　　　　Notwithstanding　that　the　commotions　of　the　Revolution　and　the



incessant　wars　of　Napoleon　could　not　have　been　favourable　to　the



prosperity　of　French　industry　notwithstanding　that　the　French　lost



during　this　period　most　of　their　maritime　trade　and　all　their



colonies；　yet　French　manufactories；　solely　from　their　exclusive



possession　of　their　home　markets；　and　from　the　abrogation　of　feudal



restrictions；　attained　during　the　Empire　to　a　higher　degree　of



prosperity　than　they　had　ever　enjoyed　under　the　preceding　ancien



r間ime。　The　same　effects　were　noticeable　in　Germany　and　in　all



countries　over　which　the　Continental　blockade　extended。



　　　　Napoleon　said　in　his　trenchant　style；　that　under　the　existing



circumstances　of　the　world　any　State　which　adopted　the　principle　of



free　trade　must　come　to　the　ground。　In　these　words　he　uttered　more



political　wisdom　in　reference　to　the　commercial　policy　of　France



than　all　contemporary　political　economists　in　all　their　writings。



We　cannot　but　wonder　at　the　sagacity　with　which　this　great　genius；



without　any　previous　study　of　the　systems　of　political　economy；



comprehended　the　nature　and　importance　of　manufacturing　power。　Well



was　it　for　him　and　for　France　that　he　had　not　studied　these



systems。　'Formerly；'　said　Napoleon；　'there　was　but　one　description



of　property；　the　possession　of　land；　but　a　new　property　has　now



risen　up；　namely；　industry。'　Napoleon　saw；　and　in　this　way　clearly



enunciated；　what　contemporary　economists　did　not　see；　or　did　not



clearly　enunciate；　namely；　that　a　nation　which　combines　in　itself



the　power　of　manufactures　with　that　of　agriculture　is　an



immeasurably　more　perfect　and　more　wealthy　nation　than　a　purely



agricultural　one。　What　Napoleon　did　to　found　and　promote　the



industrial　education　of　France；　to　improve　the　country's　credit；　to



introduce　and　set　going　new　inventions　and　improved　processes；　and



to　perfect　the　means　of　internal　communication　in　France；　it　is　not



necessary　to　dwell　upon　in　detail；　for　these　things　are　still　too



well　remembered。　But　what；　perhaps；　does　call　for　special　notice　in



this　connection；　is　the　biassed　and　unfair　judgment　passed　upon



this　enlightened　and　powerful　ruler　by　contemporary　theorists。



　　　　With　the　fall　of　Napoleon；　English　competition；　which　had　been



till　then　restricted　to　a　contraband　trade；　recovered　its　footing



on　the　continents　of　Europe　and　America。　Now　for　the　first　time　the



English　were　heard　to　condemn　protection　and　to　eulogise　Adam



Smith's　doctrine　of　free　trade；　a　doctrine　which　heretofore　those



practical　islanders　considered　as　suited　only　to　an　ideal　state　of



Utopian　perfection。　But　an　impartial；　critical　observer　might



easily　discern　the　entire　aBsence　of　mere　sentimental　motives　of



philanthropy　in　this　conversion；　for　only　when　increased　facilities



for　the　exportation　of　English　goods　to　the　continents　of　Europe



and　America　were　in　question　were　cosmopolitan　arguments　resorted



to；　but　so　soon　as　the　question　turned　upon　the　free　importation　of



corn；　or　whether　foreign　goods　might　be　allowed　to　compete　at　all



with　British　manufactures　in　the　English　market；　in　that　case　quite



different　principles　were　appealed　to。（3*）　Unhappily；　it　was　said；



the　long　continuance　in　England　of　a　policy　contrary　to　natural



principles　had　created　an　artificial　state　of　things；　which　could



not　Be　interfered　with　suddenly　without　incurring　the　risk　of



dangerous　and　mischievous　consequences。　It　was　not　to　be　attempted



without　the　greatest　caution　and　prudence。　It　was　England's



misfortune；　not　her　fault。　All　the　more　gratifying　ought　it　to　be



for　the　nations　of　the　European　and　American　continents；　that　their



happy　lot　and　condition　left　them　quite　free　to　partake　without



delay　of　the　blessings　of　free　trade。



　　　　In　France；　although　her　ancient　dynasty　reascended　the　throne



under　the　protection　of　the　banner　of　England；　or　at　any　rate　by



the　influence　of　English　gold；　the　above　arguments　did　not　obtain



currency　for　very　long。　England's　free　trade　wrought　such　havoc



amongst　the　manufacturing　industries　which　had　prospered　and　grown



strong　under　the　Continental　blockade　system；　that　a　prohibitive



r間ime　was　speedily　resorted　to；　under　the　protecting　aegis　of



which；　according　to　Dupin's　testimony；（4*）　the　producing　power　of



French　manufactories　was　doubled　between　the　years　1815　and　1827。







NOTES：







1。　'Eloge　de　Jean　Baptiste　Colbert；　par　Necker'　（1773）　（OEuvres



Completes；　vol。　xv。）。







2。　See　Quesnay's　paper　entitled；　'Physiocratie；　ou　du　Gouvernement



le　plus　avantageux　au　Genre　Humain　（1768）；'　Note　5；　'sur　la　maxime



viii；'　wherein　Quesnay　contradicts　and　condemns　Colbert　in　two



brief　pages；　whereas　Necker　devoted　a　hundred　pages　to　the



exposition　of　Colbert's　system　and　of　what　he　accomplished。　It　is



hard　to　say　whether　we　are　to　wonder　most　at　the　ignorance　of



Quesnay　on　matters　of　industry；　history；　and　finance；　or　at　the



presumption　with　which　he　passes　judgment　upon　such　a　man　as



Colbert　without　adducing　grounds　for　it。　Add　to　that；　that　this



ignorant　dreamer　was　not　even　candid　enoug