°®°®Ð¡ËµÍø > ÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > the life of stephen a. douglas >

µÚ23ÕÂ

the life of stephen a. douglas-µÚ23ÕÂ

С˵£º the life of stephen a. douglas ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ3500×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



¡¡purest¡¡and¡¡best¡¡of¡¡living¡¡men¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡The¡¡word¡¡'State'¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡'Territory'¡¡was¡¡put¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Nebraska¡¡bill¡¡to¡¡knock¡¡in¡¡the¡¡head¡¡this¡¡Abolition¡¡doctrine¡¡that¡¡there¡¡will¡¡be¡¡no¡¡more¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡even¡¡if¡¡the¡¡people¡¡want¡¡them¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡The¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡formed¡¡a¡¡Constitution¡¡as¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State¡¡and¡¡asked¡¡admission¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡Free¡¡Soil¡¡party¡¡of¡¡the¡¡North£»¡¡being¡¡in¡¡a¡¡majority£»¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡her¡¡because¡¡she¡¡had¡¡slavery¡¡as¡¡one¡¡of¡¡her¡¡institutions¡£¡¡¡¡Hence£»¡¡the¡¡first¡¡slavery¡¡agitation¡¡arouse¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡State¡¡and¡¡not¡¡upon¡¡a¡¡Territory¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡The¡¡whole¡¡Abolition¡¡agitation¡¡arose¡¡on¡¡that¡¡doctrine¡¡of¡¡prohibiting¡¡a¡¡State¡¡from¡¡coming¡¡in¡¡with¡¡slavery¡¡or¡¡not¡¡as¡¡it¡¡pleased£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡same¡¡doctrine¡¡is¡¡here¡¡in¡¡this¡¡Republican¡¡platform¡¡of¡¡1854¡£¡¨

The¡¡peculiar¡¡difficult¡¡of¡¡meeting¡¡Douglas¡¡in¡¡argument¡¡before¡¡a¡¡popular¡¡audience¡¡is¡¡here¡¡exhibited¡¡in¡¡its¡¡most¡¡perfect¡¡form¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡persuasive¡¡force¡¡of¡¡his¡¡last¡¡proposition¡¡lay¡¡in¡¡a¡¡most¡¡ingenious¡¡play¡¡on¡¡the¡¡words¡¡¡¨State¡¨¡¡and¡¡¡¨Territory¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡Although¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Missouri¡¡had¡¡formed¡¡a¡¡State¡¡Constitution£»¡¡they¡¡did¡¡not¡¡become¡¡a¡¡State¡¡until¡¡Congress¡¡approved¡¡it¡¡and¡¡formally¡¡admitted¡¡them¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡period¡¡of¡¡dispute¡¡they¡¡continued¡¡a¡¡Territory¡£¡¡Douglas'¡¡argument¡¡assumes¡¡that¡¡they¡¡became¡¡a¡¡State¡¡on¡¡forming¡¡a¡¡Constitution¡£





Chapter¡¡XV¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡Debates¡¡with¡¡Lincoln¡¡Continued¡£




The¡¡second¡¡debate¡¡was¡¡held¡¡at¡¡Freeport¡¡on¡¡August¡¡27th¡£¡¡¡¡Lincoln¡¡opened¡¡his¡¡speech¡¡with¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡answers¡¡to¡¡the¡¡questions¡¡asked¡¡at¡¡Ottawa¡£

¡¨I¡¡do¡¡not£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡¡¨stand¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡unconditional¡¡repeal¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡law¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*

¡¨I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡stand¡¡pledged¡¡against¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡any¡¡more¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*

¡¨I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡stand¡¡pledged¡¡against¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new¡¡State¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡with¡¡such¡¡a¡¡Constitutions¡¡as¡¡the¡¡people¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡may¡¡see¡¡fit¡¡to¡¡make¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*

¡¨I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡stand¡¡pledged¡¡to¡¡the¡¡abolition¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡District¡¡of¡¡Columbia¡£¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*

¡¨I'm¡¡impliedly£»¡¡if¡¡not¡¡expressly£»¡¡pledged¡¡to¡¡a¡¡belief¡¡in¡¡the¡¡right¡¡and¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡Congress¡¡to¡¡prohibit¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡all¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡Territories¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*

¡¨I¡¡am¡¡not¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡honest¡¡acquisition¡¡of¡¡territory¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡I¡¡would¡¡or¡¡would¡¡not¡¡oppose¡¡such¡¡acquisition¡¡accordingly¡¡as¡¡I¡¡might¡¡think¡¡such¡¡acquisition¡¡would¡¡or¡¡would¡¡not¡¡aggravate¡¡the¡¡slavery¡¡question¡¡among¡¡ourselves¡£¡¨

The¡¡questions¡¡asked¡¡and¡¡answered¡¡were£»¡¡whether¡¡he¡¡was¡¡PLEDGED¡¡to¡¡any¡¡of¡¡these¡¡things¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡was¡¡willing£»¡¡however£»¡¡to¡¡state¡¡what¡¡he¡¡really¡¡thought¡¡of¡¡them¡£

¡¨I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡hesitate¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡under¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Southern¡¡States¡¡are¡¡entitled¡¡to¡¡a¡¡Congressional¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡Law¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡The¡¡existing¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡Law¡¡should¡¡have¡¡been¡¡so¡¡framed¡¡as¡¡to¡¡be¡¡free¡¡from¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡objections¡¡that¡¡pertain¡¡to¡¡it¡¡without¡¡lessening¡¡its¡¡efficiency¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡In¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡the¡¡admission¡¡of¡¡any¡¡more¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union£»¡¡I¡¡state¡¡to¡¡you¡¡frankly¡¡that¡¡I¡¡would¡¡be¡¡exceedingly¡¡sorry¡¡ever¡¡to¡¡be¡¡put¡¡in¡¡a¡¡position¡¡of¡¡having¡¡to¡¡pass¡¡upon¡¡that¡¡question¡£¡¡I¡¡should¡¡be¡¡exceedingly¡¡glad¡¡to¡¡know¡¡that¡¡there¡¡would¡¡never¡¡be¡¡another¡¡slave¡¡State¡¡admitted¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union£»¡¡but¡¡I¡¡must¡¡add¡¡that£»¡¡if¡¡slavery¡¡be¡¡kept¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡during¡¡their¡¡territorial¡¡existence£»¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡and¡¡then¡¡the¡¡people¡¡shall¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡adopt¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡Constitution£»¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡I¡¡see¡¡no¡¡alternative¡¡but¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡them¡¡into¡¡the¡¡Union¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡I¡¡should¡¡not¡¡be¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡abolishing¡¡slavery¡¡in¡¡the¡¡District¡¡of¡¡Columbia£»¡¡unless¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡condition¡¡that¡¡abolition¡¡should¡¡be¡¡gradual£»¡¡that¡¡it¡¡should¡¡be¡¡on¡¡the¡¡vote¡¡of¡¡a¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡qualified¡¡voters¡¡of¡¡the¡¡District£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡compensation¡¡be¡¡made¡¡to¡¡unwilling¡¡owners¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡What¡¡I¡¡am¡¡saying¡¡here¡¡I¡¡suppose¡¡I¡¡say¡¡to¡¡a¡¡vast¡¡audience¡¡as¡¡strongly¡¡tending¡¡to¡¡Abolitionism¡¡as¡¡any¡¡audience¡¡in¡¡the¡¡State¡¡of¡¡Illinois£»¡¡and¡¡I¡¡believe¡¡I¡¡am¡¡saying¡¡that¡¡which£»¡¡if¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡offensive¡¡to¡¡any¡¡persons¡¡and¡¡render¡¡them¡¡enemies¡¡to¡¡myself£»¡¡would¡¡be¡¡offensive¡¡to¡¡persons¡¡in¡¡this¡¡audience¡£¡¨¡¡He¡¡then¡¡asked¡¡Douglas¡¡four¡¡questions£º

1st¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨If¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡Kansas¡¡shall¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡adopt¡¡a¡¡State¡¡Constitution¡¡and¡¡ask¡¡admission¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡before¡¡they¡¡have¡¡the¡¡requisite¡¡number¡¡of¡¡inhabitants¡¡under¡¡the¡¡English¡¡bill£»¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡will¡¡you¡¡vote¡¡to¡¡admit¡¡them£¿

2nd¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨Can¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡a¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡Territory¡¡in¡¡any¡¡lawful¡¡way£»¡¡against¡¡the¡¡wish¡¡of¡¡any¡¡citizen£»¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡¡from¡¡its¡¡limits¡¡prior¡¡to¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡State¡¡Constitution£¿

3rd¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨If¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡shall¡¡decide¡¡that¡¡States¡¡cannot¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡¡from¡¡their¡¡limits£»¡¡are¡¡you¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡acquiescing¡¡in£»¡¡adopting¡¡and¡¡following¡¡such¡¡decision¡¡as¡¡a¡¡rule¡¡of¡¡political¡¡action£¿

4th¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨Are¡¡you¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡acquiring¡¡additional¡¡territory¡¡in¡¡disregard¡¡of¡¡how¡¡such¡¡action¡¡may¡¡affect¡¡the¡¡Nation¡¡on¡¡the¡¡slavery¡¡question£¿

When¡¡the¡¡Nebraska¡¡bill¡¡was¡¡introduced£»¡¡he¡¡continued£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡declared¡¡the¡¡intent¡¡and¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡the¡¡act¡¡not¡¡to¡¡legislate¡¡slavery¡¡into¡¡any¡¡State¡¡or¡¡Territory¡¡or¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡it¡¡therefrom£»¡¡but¡¡to¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡people¡¡perfectly¡¡free¡¡to¡¡regulate¡¡their¡¡own¡¡domestic¡¡institutions¡¡in¡¡their¡¡own¡¡way¡£¡¡¡¡Chase¡¡of¡¡Ohio¡¡introduced¡¡an¡¡amendment¡¡expressly¡¡declaring¡¡that¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Territory¡¡should¡¡have¡¡the¡¡power¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡¡if¡¡they¡¡saw¡¡fit¡£¡¡¡¡Douglas¡¡and¡¡those¡¡who¡¡agreed¡¡with¡¡him£»¡¡voted¡¡it¡¡down¡£¡¡¡¡A¡¡little¡¡later¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡decided¡¡that¡¡a¡¡territorial¡¡legislature¡¡had¡¡no¡¡right¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡£

¡¨For¡¡men¡¡who¡¡did¡¡intend¡¡that¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Territory¡¡should¡¡have¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡the¡¡voting¡¡down¡¡of¡¡Chase's¡¡amendment¡¡is¡¡wholly¡¡inexplicable¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡puzzle£»¡¡a¡¡riddle¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡with¡¡men¡¡who¡¡did¡¡look¡¡forward¡¡to¡¡such¡¡a¡¡decision¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*

the¡¡voting¡¡down¡¡of¡¡that¡¡amendment¡¡would¡¡be¡¡perfectly¡¡rational¡¡and¡¡intelligible¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡would¡¡keep¡¡Congress¡¡from¡¡coming¡¡into¡¡collision¡¡with¡¡the¡¡decision¡¡when¡¡it¡¡was¡¡made¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡If¡¡there¡¡was¡¡an¡¡intention¡¡or¡¡expectation¡¡that¡¡such¡¡a¡¡decision¡¡was¡¡to¡¡follow£»¡¡it¡¡would¡¡not¡¡be¡¡very¡¡desirable¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Democratic¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡to¡¡decide¡¡one¡¡way¡¡when¡¡the¡¡party¡¡in¡¡Congress¡¡had¡¡decided¡¡the¡¡other¡£¡¡¡¡Hence¡¡it¡¡would¡¡be¡¡very¡¡rational¡¡for¡¡men¡¡expecting¡¡such¡¡a¡¡decision¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡the¡¡niche¡¡in¡¡that¡¡law¡¡clear¡¡for¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡It¡¡looks¡¡to¡¡me¡¡as¡¡though¡¡here¡¡was¡¡the¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡Chase's¡¡amendment¡¡was¡¡voted¡¡down¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡If¡¡it¡¡was¡¡done¡¡for¡¡a¡¡different¡¡reason£»¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡he¡¡knows¡¡what¡¡that¡¡reason¡¡was¡¡and¡¡can¡¡tell¡¡us¡¡what¡¡it¡¡was¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡vastly¡¡more¡¡satisfactory¡¡to¡¡the¡¡country¡¡for¡¡him¡¡to¡¡give¡¡some¡¡other¡¡intelligible£»¡¡plausible¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡it¡¡was¡¡voted¡¡down¡¡than¡¡to¡¡stand¡¡upon¡¡his¡¡dignity¡¡and¡¡call¡¡people¡¡liars¡£¡¨

Cass£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡said£»¡¡on¡¡behalf¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Democrats¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Senate£»¡¡proposed¡¡to¡¡Chase¡¡that¡¡he¡¡so¡¡change¡¡his¡¡amendment¡¡as¡¡to¡¡provide¡¡that¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Territory¡¡should¡¡have¡¡power¡¡either¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡or¡¡exclude¡¡slavery£»¡¡and¡¡they¡¡would¡¡accept¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡Chase£»¡¡having¡¡conscientious¡¡scruples¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡slavery£»¡¡declined¡¡to¡¡do¡¡this¡¡and¡¡his¡¡amendment¡¡was¡¡voted¡¡down¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡it¡¡was¡¡quite¡¡possible¡¡for¡¡them¡¡to¡¡have¡¡accepted¡¡Chase's¡¡amendment£»¡¡forbidden¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡rule£»¡¡but¡¡an¡¡amendment¡¡to¡¡the¡¡amended¡¡bill£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡permitted¡£

Douglas£»¡¡in¡¡his¡¡reply£»¡¡with¡¡admirable¡¡readiness£»¡¡addressed¡¡himself¡¡to¡¡Lincoln's¡¡four¡¡questions¡£¡¡¡¡¡¨In¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡Kansas£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said£»¡¡¡¨it¡¡is¡¡my¡¡opinion¡¡that£»¡¡as¡¡she¡¡has¡¡population¡¡enough¡¡to¡¡constitute¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡State£»¡¡she¡¡has¡¡people¡¡enough¡¡for¡¡a¡¡free¡¡State¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡The¡¡next¡¡question¡¡is£»¡¡'Can¡¡the¡¡people¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Territory¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡exclude¡¡slavery¡¡prior¡¡to¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡State¡¡Constitution£¿'¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡In¡¡my¡¡opinion¡¡they¡¡can¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡It¡¡matters¡¡not¡¡in¡¡what¡¡way¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡may¡¡hereafter¡¡decide¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡abstract¡¡question¡¡whether¡¡slavery¡¡may¡¡or¡¡may¡¡not¡¡go¡¡into¡¡a¡¡Territory¡¡under¡¡the¡¡Constitution£»¡¡the¡¡people¡¡have¡¡the¡¡lawful¡¡means¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡it¡¡or¡¡exclude¡¡it¡¡as¡¡they¡¡please£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡reason¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡cannot¡¡exist¡¡a¡¡day¡¡or¡¡an¡¡hour¡¡anywhere£»¡¡unless¡¡it¡¡is¡¡supported¡¡by¡¡local¡¡police¡¡regulations¡£¡¡Those¡¡police¡¡regulations¡¡can¡¡only¡¡be¡¡established¡¡by¡¡the¡¡local¡¡legislature£»¡¡and¡¡if¡¡the¡¡people¡¡are¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡slavery¡¡they¡¡will¡¡elect¡¡representatives¡¡to¡¡that¡¡body¡¡who¡¡will£»¡¡by¡¡unfriendly¡¡legislation£»¡¡effectually¡¡prevent¡¡the¡¡introduction¡¡of¡¡it¡¡into¡¡their¡¡midst¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contrary¡¡they¡¡are¡¡for¡¡it£»¡¡their¡¡legislation¡¡will¡¡favor¡¡its¡¡extension¡£¡¡¡¡Hence£»¡¡no¡¡matter¡¡what¡¡the¡¡decision¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡¡may¡¡be¡¡on¡¡that¡¡abstract¡¡question£»¡¡still¡¡the¡¡right¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡¡to¡¡make¡¡a¡¡slave¡¡Territory¡¡or¡¡a¡¡free¡¡Territory£»¡¡is¡¡perfect¡¡and¡¡complete¡¡under¡¡the¡¡Nebraska¡¡bill¡£¡¨

This¡¡bill¡¡provided¡¡that¡¡the¡¡legislative¡¡power¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Territory¡¡should¡¡extend¡¡to¡¡all¡¡rightful¡¡subjects¡¡of¡¡legislation¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡made¡¡no¡¡exception¡¡as¡¡to¡¡slavery£»¡¡but¡¡gave¡¡full¡¡power¡¡to¡¡introduce¡¡or¡¡exclude¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡What¡¡more¡¡could¡¡Chase's¡¡amendment¡¡do£¿¡¡¡¡Chase¡¡offered¡¡it¡¡for¡¡the¡¡purpose¡¡of¡¡having¡¡it¡¡rejected¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡expected¡¡it¡¡to¡¡be¡¡capital¡¡for¡¡small¡¡politicians£»¡¡and¡¡he¡¡was¡¡not¡¡mistaken¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡was¡¡amazed¡¡that¡¡Lincoln¡¡should¡¡ask¡¡his¡¡third¡¡question¡£¡¡¡¡He¡¡had¡¡denounced¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Senate¡¡an¡¡article¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Washington¡¡Union¡¡claiming¡¡that¡¡any¡¡provision¡¡in¡¡the¡¡laws¡¡or¡¡Constitutions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡free¡¡States¡¡excluding¡¡slavery¡¡was¡¡in¡¡conflict¡¡with¡¡the¡¡Constitution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡£¡¡Senator¡¡Toombs£»¡¡on¡¡behalf¡¡of¡¡the¡¡South£»¡¡had¡¡utterly¡¡repudiated¡¡the¡¡doctrine¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡question¡¡cast¡¡an¡¡imputation¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡Supreme¡¡Court¡£¡¡Such¡¡a¡¡decision¡¡was¡¡not¡¡possible¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡would¡¡be¡¡an¡¡act¡¡of¡¡moral¡¡treason¡¡that¡¡no¡¡man¡¡on¡¡the¡¡bench¡¡could¡¡ever¡¡descend¡¡to¡£

¡¨As¡¡to¡¡Lincoln's¡¡fourth¡¡question£»¡¨¡¡he¡¡said£º¡¡¡¡¡¨I¡¡answer£»¡¡that¡¡whenever¡¡it¡¡becomes¡¡necessary¡¡in¡¡our¡¡growth¡¡and¡¡progress¡¡to¡¡acquire¡¡more¡¡territory£»¡¡I¡¡am¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡it¡¡without¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡slavery£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡we¡¡have¡¡acquired¡¡it¡¡I¡¡would¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡people¡¡free¡¡to¡¡do¡¡as¡¡they¡¡please£»¡¡either¡¡to¡¡make¡¡it¡¡slave¡¡or¡¡free¡¡territory¡¡as¡¡they¡¡preferred¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡I¡¡tell¡¡you£»¡¡increase£»¡¡multiply¡¡and¡¡expand¡¡is¡¡the¡¡law¡¡of¡¡this¡¡Nation's¡¡existence¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡Just¡¡as¡¡fast¡¡as¡¡our¡¡interests¡¡and¡¡our¡¡destiny¡¡require¡¡additional¡¡territory¡¡in¡¡the¡¡North£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡South¡¡or¡¡on¡¡the¡¡islands¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ocean£»¡¡I¡¡am¡¡for¡¡it£»¡¡and£»¡¡when¡¡we¡¡acquire¡¡it£»¡¡will¡¡leave¡¡the¡¡people¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡free¡¡to¡¡do¡¡as¡¡they¡¡please¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡and¡¡every¡¡other¡¡question¡£¡¨

At¡¡all¡¡the¡¡Republican¡¡Congressional¡¡Conventions¡¡held¡¡in¡¡Illinois¡¡in¡¡1854£»¡¡the¡¡resolutions¡¡adopted¡¡declared¡¡that¡¡the¡¡continued¡¡aggressions¡¡of¡¡slavery¡¡were¡¡destructive¡¡of¡¡the¡¡best¡¡rights¡¡of¡¡a¡¡free¡¡people¡¡and¡¡must¡¡be¡¡resisted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡united¡¡political¡¡action¡¡of¡¡all¡¡good¡¡men£»¡¡Kansas¡¡and¡¡Nebraska¡¡must¡¡be¡¡made¡¡free¡¡Territories£»¡¡the¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡Law¡¡repealed£»¡¡slavery¡¡restricted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡States¡¡in¡¡which¡¡it¡¡then¡¡existed£»¡¡no¡¡more¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡admitted£»¡¡slavery¡¡excluded¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Territories¡¡and¡¡no¡¡more¡¡Territories¡¡acquired¡¡unless¡¡slavery¡¡therein¡¡were¡¡prohibited£»¡¡and¡¡no¡¡man¡¡must¡¡be¡¡supported¡¡for¡¡office¡¡unless¡¡positively¡¡pledged¡¡to¡¡support¡¡these¡¡principles¡£

¡¨Yet¡¡Lincoln¡¡denies¡¡that¡¡he¡¡stands¡¡on¡¡this¡¡platform¡¡and¡¡declares¡¡that¡¡he¡¡would¡¡not¡¡like¡¡to¡¡be¡¡placed¡¡in¡¡a¡¡position¡¡where¡¡he¡¡would¡¡have¡¡to¡¡vote¡¡for¡¡these¡¡things¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡I¡¡do¡¡not¡¡think¡¡there¡¡is¡¡much¡¡danger¡¡of¡¡his¡¡being¡¡placed¡¡in¡¡such¡¡a¡¡position¡£¡¡¡¡*¡¡*¡¡*¡¡I¡¡propose£»¡¡out¡¡of¡¡mere¡¡kindness£»¡¡to¡¡relieve¡¡him¡¡from¡¡any¡¡such¡¡necessity¡£¡¨

When¡¡the¡¡legislature¡¡elected¡¡in¡¡1854¡¡came¡¡to¡¡choose¡¡between¡¡Lincoln¡¡and¡¡Trumbull¡¡for¡¡Senator£»¡¡before¡¡a¡¡ballot¡¡was¡¡taken£»¡¡Lovejoy£»¡¡the¡¡Abolitionist¡¡introduced¡¡resolutions¡¡declaring¡¡that¡¡slavery¡¡must¡¡be¡¡excluded¡¡from¡¡all¡¡the¡¡territory¡¡then¡¡owned¡¡or¡¡thereafter¡¡acquired¡¡by¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡that¡¡no¡¡more¡¡slave¡¡States¡¡should¡¡be¡¡admitted¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Fugitive¡¡Slave¡¡Law¡¡should¡¡be¡¡unconditionally¡¡repea

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨1£© ²È£¨2£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ