bentham-第4章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
he properties of man； and of man's position in the world。 The knowledge which any inquirer possesses of these properties； constitutes a limit beyond which； as a moralist or a political philosopher； whatever be his powers of mind； he cannot reach。 Nobody's synthesis can be more complete than his analysis。 If in his survey of human nature and life he has left any element out； then； wheresoever that element exerts any influence； his conclusions will fail； more or less； in their application。 If he has left out many elements； and those very important； his labours may be highly valuable； he may have largely contributed to that body of partial truths which； when completed and corrected by one another； constitute practical truth； but the applicability of his system to practice in its own proper shape will be of an exceedingly limited range。 Human nature and human life are wide subjects； and whoever would embark in an enterprise requiring a thorough knowledge of them； has need both of large stores of his own； and of all aids and appliances from elsewhere。 His qualifications for success will be proportional to two things： the degree in which his own nature and circumstances furnish them with a correct and complete picture of man's nature and circumstances； and his capacity of deriving light from other minds。 Bentham failed in deriving light from other minds。 His writings contain few traces of the accurate knowledge of any schools of thinking but his own； and many proofs of his entire conviction that they could teach him nothing worth knowing。 For some of the most illustrious of previous thinkers； his contempt was unmeasured。 In almost the only passage of the 'Deontology' which； from its style； and from its having before appeared in print； may be known to be Bentham's； Socrates； and Plato are spoken of in terms distressing to his great admirers； and the incapacity to appreciate such men； is a fact perfectly in unison with the general habits of Bentham's mind。 He had a phrase； expressive of the view he took of all moral speculations to which his method had not been applied； or （which he considered as the same thing） not founded on a recognition of utility as the moral standard； this phrase was 'vague generalities'。 Whatever presented itself to him in such a shape； he dismissed as unworthy of notice； or dwelt upon only to denounce as absurd。 He did not heed； or rather the nature of his mind prevented it from occurring to him； that these generalities contained the whole unanalysed experience of the human race。 Unless it can be asserted that mankind did not know anything until logicians taught it to them that until the last hand has been put to a moral truth by giving it a metaphysically precise expression； all the previous rough…hewing which it has undergone by the common intellect at the suggestion of common wants and common experience is to go for nothing； it must be allowed； that even the originality which can； and the courage which dares； think for itself； is not a more necessary part of the philosophical character than a thoughtful regard for previous thinkers； and for the collective mind of the human race。 What has been the opinion of mankind； has been the opinion of persons of all tempers and dispositions； of all partialities and prepossessions； of all varieties in position； in education； in opportunities of observation and inquiry。 No one inquirer is all this； every inquirer is either young or old； rich or poor； sickly or healthy； married or unmarried； meditative or active； a poet or a logician； an ancient or a modern； a man or a woman； and if a thinking person； has； in addition； the accidental peculiarities of his individual modes of thought。 Every circumstance which gives a character to the life of a human being； carries with it its peculiar biases； its peculiar facilities for perceiving some things； and for missing or forgetting others。 But； from points of view different from his； different things are perceptible； and none are more likely to have seen what he does not see； than those who do not see what he sees。 The general opinion of mankind is the average of the conclusions of all minds； stripped indeed of their choicest and most recondite thoughts； but freed from their twists and partialities： a net result； in which everybody's point of view is represented； nobody's predominant。 The collective mind does not penetrate below the surface； but it sees all the surface； which profound thinkers； even by reason of their profundity； often fail to do： their intenser view of a thing in some of its aspects diverting their attention from others。 The hardiest assertor； therefore； of the freedom of private judgment the keenest detector of the errors of his predecessors； and of the inaccuracies of current modes of thought is the very person who most needs to fortify the weak side of his own intellect； by study of the opinions of mankind in all ages and nations； and of the speculations of philosophers of the modes of thought most opposite to his own。 It is there that he will find the experiences denied to himself the remainder of the truth of which he sees but half the truths； of which the errors he detects are commonly but the exaggerations。 If； like Bentham； he brings with him an improved instrument of investigation； the greater is the probability that he will find ready prepared a rich abundance of rough ore； which was merely waiting for that instrument。 A man of clear ideas errs grievously if he imagines that whatever is seen confusedly does not exist： it belongs to him； when he meets with such a thing； to dispel the mist； and fix the outlines of the vague form which is looming through it。 Bentham's contempt； then； of all other schools of thinkers； his determination to create a philosophy wholly out of the materials furnished by his own mind； and by minds like his own； was his first disqualification as a philosopher。 His second； was the incompleteness of his own mind as a representative of universal human nature。 In many of the most natural and strongest feelings of human nature he had no sympathy； from many of its graver experiences he was altogether cut off； and the faculty by which one mind understands a mind different from itself； and throws itself into the feelings of that other mind； was denied him by his deficiency of Imagination。 With Imagination in the popular sense； command of imagery and metaphorical expression； Bentham was； to a certain degree； endowed。 For want； indeed； of poetical culture； the images with which his fancy supplied him were seldom beautiful； but they were quaint and humorous； or bold； forcible； and intense： passages might be quoted from him both of playful irony； and of declamatory eloquence； seldom surpassed in the writings of philosophers。 The Imagination which he had not； was that to which the name is generally appropriated by the best writers of the present day； that which enables us； by a voluntary effort； to conceive the absent as if it were present； the imaginary as if it were real； and to cloth it in the feelings which； if it were indeed real； it would bring along with it。 This is the power by which one human being enters into the mind and circumstances of another。 This power constitutes the poet； in so far as he does anything but melodiously utter his own actual feelings。 It constitutes the dramatist entirely。 It is one of the constituents of the historian； by it we understand other times； by it Guizot interprets to us the middle ages； Nisard； in his beautiful Studies on the later Latin poets； places us in the Rome of the Caesars； Michelet disengages the distinctive characters of the different races and generations of mankind from the facts of their history。 Without it nobody knows even his own nature； further than circumstances have actually tried it and called it out； nor the nature of his fellow…creatures； beyond such generalizations as he may have been enabled to make from his observation of their outward conduct。 By these limits； accordingly； Bentham's knowledge of human nature is bounded。 It is wholly empirical； and the empiricism of one who has had little experience。 He had neither internal experience nor external； the quiet； even tenor of his life； and his healthiness of mind； conspired to exclude him from both。 He never knew prosperity and adversity； passion nor satiety。 he never had even the experiences which sickness gives； he lived from childhood to the age of eighty…five in boyish health。 He knew no dejection； no heaviness of heart。 He never felt life a sore and a weary burthen。 He was a boy to the last。 Self…consciousness； that daemon of the men of genius of our time； from Wordsworth to Byron； from Goethe to Chateaubriand； and to which this age owes so much both of its cheerful and its mournful wisdom； never was awakened in him。 How much of human nature slumbered in him he knew not； neither can we know。 He had never been made alive to the unseen influences which were acting on himself； nor consequently on his fellow…creatures。 Other ages and other nations were a blank to him for purposes of instruction。 He measured them but by one standard； their knowledge of facts； and their capability to take correct views of utility； and merge all other objects in it。 His own lot was cast in a generation of the leanest and barrenest men whom England had yet produced； and he was an old man when a better race came in with the present century。 He saw accordingly in man little but what the vulgarest eye can see； recognized no diversities of character but such as he who runs may read。 Knowing so little of human feelings； he knew still less of the influences by which those feelings are formed： all the more subtle workings both of the mind upon itself； and of external things upon the mind； escaped him； and no one； probably； who； in a highly instructed age； ever attempted to give a rule to all human conduct； set out with a more limited conception either of the agencies by which human conduct is； or of those by which it should be； influenced。 This； then； is our idea of Bentham。 He was a man both of remarkable endowments for philosophy； and of remarkable deficiencies for it： fitted； beyond almost any man； for drawing from his premises； conclusions not only correct； but sufficiently precise and specific to be practical： but whose general conception of human nature and life furnished him with an unusually slender stock of premises。 It is obvious what would be likely to be achieved by such a man； what a thinker； thus gifted and thus disqualified； could do in philosophy。 He could； with close and accurate logic； hunt half…truths to their consequences and practical applications； on a scale both of greatness and of minuteness not previously exemplified； and this is the character which posterity will probably assign to Bentham。 We express our sincere and well…considered conviction when we say； that there is hardly anything positive in Bentham's philosophy which is not true： that when his practical conclusions are erroneous； which in our opinion they are very often； it is not because the considerations which he urges are not rational and valid in themselves； but because some more important principle； which he did not perceive； supersedes those considerations； and turns the scale。 The bad part of his wr
