a treatise on parents and children(父母与子女专题研究)-第10章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
book of Numbers。 But as it is less trouble to set a lesson that you know
yourself； there is a tendency to keep repeating the already learnt lesson
rather than break new ground。 At school I began with a fairly complete
knowledge of Latin grammar in the childish sense of being able to repeat
all the paradigms； and I was kept at this； or rather kept in a class where the
master never asked me to do it because he knew I could； and therefore
devoted himself to trapping the boys who could not； until I finally forgot
most of it。 But when progress took place； what did it mean？ First it
meant Caesar； with the foreknowledge that to master Caesar meant only
being set at Virgil； with the culminating horror of Greek and Homer in
reserve at the end of that。 I preferred Caesar； because his statement that
Gaul is divided into three parts； though neither interesting nor true； was
the only Latin sentence I could translate at sight： therefore the longer we
stuck at Caesar the better I was pleased。 Just so do less classically
educated children see nothing in the mastery of addition but the beginning
of subtraction； and so on through multiplication and division and fractions；
with the black cloud of algebra on the horizon。 And if a boy rushes
through all that； there is always the calculus to fall back on； unless indeed
you insist on his learning music； and proceed to hit him if he cannot tell
you the year Beethoven was born。
A child has a right to finality as regards its compulsory lessons。 Also
44
… Page 45…
A TREATISE ON PARENTS AND CHILDREN
as regards physical training。 At present it is assumed that the
schoolmaster has a right to force every child into an attempt to become
Porson and Bentley； Leibnitz and Newton； all rolled into one。 This is the
tradition of the oldest grammar schools。 In our times an even more
horrible and cynical claim has been made for the right to drive boys
through compulsory games in the playing fields until they are too much
exhausted physically to do anything but drop off to sleep。 This is
supposed to protect them from vice； but as it also protects them from
poetry； literature； music； meditation and prayer； it may be dismissed with
the obvious remark that if boarding schools are places whose keepers are
driven to such monstrous measures lest more abominable things should
happen； then the sooner boarding schools are violently abolished the better。
It is true that society may make physical claims on the child as well as
mental ones： the child must learn to walk； to use a knife and fork； to
swim； to ride a bicycle； to acquire sufficient power of self…defence to make
an attack on it an arduous and uncertain enterprise； perhaps to fly。 What
as a matter of common…sense it clearly has not a right to do is to make this
an excuse for keeping the child slaving for ten hours at physical exercises
on the ground that it is not yet as dexterous as Cinquevalli and as strong as
Sandow。
45
… Page 46…
A TREATISE ON PARENTS AND CHILDREN
The Rewards and Risks of
Knowledge
In a word； we have no right to insist on educating a child； for its
education can end only with its life and will not even then be complete。
Compulsory completion of education is the last folly of a rotten and
desperate civilization。 It is the rattle in its throat before dissolution。 All
we can fairly do is to prescribe certain definite acquirements and
accomplishments as qualifications for certain employments； and to secure
them； not by the ridiculous method of inflicting injuries on the persons
who have not yet mastered them； but by attaching certain privileges （not
pecuniary） to the employments。
Most acquirements carry their own privileges with them。 Thus a
baby has to be pretty closely guarded and imprisoned because it cannot
take care of itself。 It has even to be carried about （the most complete
conceivable infringement of its liberty） until it can walk。 But nobody
goes on carrying children after they can walk lest they should walk into
mischief； though Arab boys make their sisters carry them； as our own
spoiled children sometimes make their nurses； out of mere laziness；
because sisters in the East and nurses in the West are kept in servitude。
But in a society of equals （the only reasonable and permanently possible
sort of society） children are in much greater danger of acquiring bandy
legs through being left to walk before they are strong enough than of being
carried when they are well able to walk。 Anyhow； freedom of movement
in a nursery is the reward of learning to walk； and in precisely the same
way freedom of movement in a city is the reward of learning how to read
public notices； and to count and use money。 The consequences are of
course much larger than the mere ability to read the name of a street or the
number of a railway platform and the destination of a train。 When you
enable a child to read these； you also enable it to read this preface； to the
utter destruction； you may quite possibly think； of its morals and docility。
You also expose it to the danger of being run over by taxicabs and trains。
The moral and physical risks of education are enormous： every new
46
… Page 47…
A TREATISE ON PARENTS AND CHILDREN
power a child acquires； from speaking； walking； and co…ordinating its
vision； to conquering continents and founding religions； opens up
immense new possibilities of mischief。 Teach a child to write and you
teach it how to forge： teach it to speak and you teach it how to lie：
teach it to walk and you teach it how to kick its mother to death。
The great problem of slavery for those whose aim is to maintain it is
the problem of reconciling the efficiency of the slave with the helplessness
that keeps him in servitude； and this problem is fortunately not completely
soluble； for it is not in fact found possible for a duke to treat his solicitor
or his doctor as he treats his laborers； though they are all equally his slaves：
the laborer being in fact less dependent on his favor than the professional
man。 Hence it is that men come to resent； of all things； protection； because
it so often means restriction of their liberty lest they should make a bad
use of it。 If there are dangerous precipices about； it is much easier and
cheaper to forbid people to walk near the edge than to put up an effective
fence： that is why both legislators and parents and the paid deputies of
parents are always inhibiting and prohibiting and punishing and scolding
and laming and cramping and delaying progress and growth instead of
making the dangerous places as safe as possible and then boldly taking
and allowing others to take the irreducible minimum of risk。
47
… Page 48…
A TREATISE ON PARENTS AND CHILDREN
English Physical Hardihood and
Spiritual Cowardice
It is easier to convert most people to the need for allowing their
children to run physical risks than moral ones。 I can remember a relative
of mine who； when I was a small child； unused to horses and very much
afraid of them； insisted on putting me on a rather rumbustious pony with
little spurs on my heels （knowing that in my agitation I would use them
unconsciously）； and being enormously amused at my terrors。 Yet when
that same lady discovered that I had found a copy of The Arabian Nights
and was devouring it with avidity； she was horrified； and hid it away from
me lest it should break my soul as the pony might have broken my neck。
This way of producing hardy bodies and timid souls is so common in
country houses that you may spend hours in them listening to stories of
broken collar bones； broken backs； and broken necks without coming upon
a single spiritual adventure or daring thought。
But whether the risks to which liberty exposes us are moral or physical
our right to liberty involves the right to run them。 A man who is not free
to risk his neck as an aviator or his soul as a heretic is not free at all； and
the right to liberty begins； not at the age of 21 years but of 21 seconds。
48
… Page 49…
A TREATISE ON PARENTS AND CHILDREN
The Risks of Ignorance and
Weakness
The difficulty with children is that they need protection from risks they
are too young to understand； and attacks they can neither avoid nor resist。
You may on academic grounds allow a child to snatch glowing coals from
the fire once。 You will not do it twice。 The risks of liberty we must let
everyone take； but the risks of ignorance and self…helplessness are another
matter。 Not only children but adults need protection from them。 At
present adults are often exposed to risks outside their knowledge or
beyond their comprehension or powers of resistance or foresight： for
example； we have to look on every day at marriages or financial
speculations that may involve far worse consequences than burnt fingers。
And just as it is part of the business of adults to protect children； to feed
them； clothe them； shelter them； and shift for them in all sorts of ways
until they are able to shift for themselves； it is coming more and more to
be seen that this is true not only of the relation between adults
