best historical novels and tales(ÇÇÄÉÉÄá¶ûµÂÀúʷС˵¹Êʾ«Ñ¡).-µÚ2ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
of¡¡an¡¡¡¨ancient¡¨¡¡romance¡¡happens¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡scholar¡¡like¡¡Ebers£»¡¡we¡¡feel¡¡that¡¡
so¡¡far¡¡at¡¡least¡¡as¡¡historical¡¡presentment¡¡goeswe¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡far¡¡wrong£»¡¡but¡¡
the¡¡¡¡¡¡bination¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡great¡¡¡¡¡¡scholarship¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡narrative¡¡¡¡¡¡capacity¡¡¡¡¡¡is£»¡¡¡¡¡¡alas£»¡¡¡¡¡¡too¡¡
rare£¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡have¡¡likewise¡¡refrained¡¡from¡¡giving¡¡many¡¡tales¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡Early¡¡¡
Christian¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡times¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡We¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡here£»¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡must¡¡¡¡¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡admitted£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡controversial¡¡
ground£»¡¡and¡¡under¡¡the¡¡First¡¡Century¡¡heading¡¡I¡¡have¡¡endeavoured¡¡to¡¡insert¡¡
romances¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡highest¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡quality¡¡¡¡¡¡only¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡For¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡instance£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡¡¡think¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡Dr¡£¡¡
Abbott's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Philochristus¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡Wallace's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Ben¡¡¡¡¡¡Hur¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡ought¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡satisfy¡¡¡¡¡¡two¡¡
different¡¡types¡¡of¡¡readers¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡And¡¡this¡¡is¡¡the¡¡place£»¡¡doubtless£»¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡in¡¡
my¡¡lists¡¡will¡¡be¡¡found¡¡books¡¡of¡¡widely¡¡differing¡¡merit¡¡and¡¡aim¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡School¡¡
teachers£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡others¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡like¡¡¡¡capacity£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡will¡¡¡¡easily¡¡¡¡¡¡discriminate¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡between¡¡
authors¡¡suitable¡¡for¡¡juvenile¡¡or¡¡untrained¡¡tastes£»¡¡and¡¡authors¡¡whose¡¡appeal¡¡
is¡¡¡¡¡¡specially¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡those¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡maturer¡¡¡¡¡¡thought¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡experience¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Differing¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡
much¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡method¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡style¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡choice¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡period¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡character¡¡¡¡¡¡type£»¡¡
Thackeray's¡¡¡¨Vanity¡¡Fair¡¨¡¡and¡¡George¡¡Eliot's¡¡¡¨Romola¡¨¡¡have¡¡at¡¡least¡¡this¡¡
in¡¡monthey¡¡require¡¡a¡¡very¡¡high¡¡degree¡¡of¡¡intelligence¡¡for¡¡their¡¡due¡¡
appreciation¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Who£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡among¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡those¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡us¡¡¡¡with¡¡¡¡¡¡any¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡knowledge¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡such¡¡
works£»¡¡¡¡¡¡would¡¡¡¡¡¡dream¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡remending¡¡¡¡¡¡them¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡youthful¡¡¡¡¡¡reader¡¡¡¡¡¡fresh¡¡
from¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡perusal¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡Miss¡¡¡¡¡¡Yonge's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Little¡¡¡¡¡¡Duke£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡or¡¡¡¡¡¡Captain¡¡¡¡¡¡Marryatt's¡¡
¡¨Children¡¡of¡¡the¡¡New¡¡Forest¡¨£¿¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Naturally¡¡in¡¡a¡¡list¡¡of¡¡this¡¡kind¡¡there¡¡is¡¡bound¡¡to¡¡be¡¡very¡¡great¡¡inequality£»¡¡
certain¡¡periods¡¡have¡¡been¡¡wholly¡¡ignored¡¡by¡¡writers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡rank£»¡¡while¡¡
in¡¡others¡¡we¡¡have¡¡something¡¡like¡¡an¡¡embarras¡¡de¡¡richesse¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Consequently£»¡¡
I¡¡have¡¡been¡¡pelled£»¡¡here¡¡and¡¡there£»¡¡to¡¡insert¡¡authors¡¡of¡¡only¡¡mediocre¡¡
merit¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡In¡¡other¡¡cases£»¡¡again£»¡¡I¡¡have¡¡not¡¡hesitated¡¡to¡¡omit¡¡works¡¡by¡¡writers¡¡
of¡¡¡¡¡¡acknowledged¡¡¡¡¡¡position¡¡¡¡¡¡when¡¡¡¡¡¡these¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡seemed¡¡¡¡¡¡below¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡author's¡¡
usual¡¡standard£»¡¡and¡¡where¡¡no¡¡gap¡¡had¡¡to¡¡be¡¡filled¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡would¡¡instance¡¡the¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡7¡¡
¡¡¡Page¡¡8¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡¡Guide¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Best¡¡Historical¡¡Novels¡¡and¡¡Tales¡¡
James¡¡II¡£¡¡¡William¡¡III¡£¡¡period¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Here¡¡Stanley¡¡Weyman¡¡and¡¡¡¨Edna¡¡Lyall¡¨¡¡
might¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡represented£»¡¡¡¡¡¡but£»¡¡¡¡¡¡there¡¡¡¡¡¡being¡¡¡¡¡¡no¡¡¡¡¡¡dearth¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡good¡¡¡¡¡¡novels¡¡
dealing¡¡with¡¡both¡¡the¡¡above¡¡reigns£»¡¡I¡¡did¡¡not¡¡deem¡¡it¡¡advisable¡¡to¡¡call¡¡in¡¡
these¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡popular¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡writers¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡at¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡point¡¡¡¡¡¡which¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡very¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡generally¡¡
considered¡¡¡¡¡¡their¡¡¡¡¡¡lowest¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡¡¡¡¡mention¡¡¡¡¡¡this¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡show¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡omissions¡¡¡¡¡¡do¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡
necessarily¡¡mean¡¡ignorance£»¡¡though£»¡¡in¡¡covering¡¡such¡¡an¡¡immense¡¡ground£»¡¡
I¡¡¡¡¡¡cannot¡¡¡¡¡¡doubt¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡romances¡¡¡¡¡¡worthy¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡place¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡my¡¡¡¡¡¡list¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡
overlooked¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡think¡¡many¡¡¡¡will¡¡be¡¡surprised¡¡to¡¡find¡¡how¡¡large¡¡a¡¡proportion¡¡of¡¡our¡¡
best¡¡writers¡¡£¨English¡¡and¡¡American£©¡¡have¡¡entered¡¡the¡¡domain¡¡of¡¡Historical¡¡
or¡¡¡¡¡¡Semi¡Historical¡¡¡¡¡¡Romance¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Scott£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Thackeray£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Dickens£»¡¡¡¡¡¡George¡¡¡¡¡¡Eliot£»¡¡
Charlotte¡¡Bronte£»¡¡George¡¡Meredith£»¡¡R¡£¡¡L¡£¡¡Stevenson£»¡¡Hawthorne£»¡¡Peacock£»¡¡
Charles¡¡Kingsley£»¡¡Henry¡¡Kingsley£»¡¡Charles¡¡Reade£»¡¡Anthony¡¡Trollope£»¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡
Gaskell£»¡¡Walter¡¡Besant£»¡¡Lytton£»¡¡Disraeli£»¡¡J¡£¡¡H¡£¡¡Newman£»¡¡J¡£¡¡A¡£¡¡Froude£»¡¡and¡¡
Walter¡¡Paterthese¡¡are¡¡a¡¡few¡¡of¡¡the¡¡names¡¡which¡¡appear¡¡in¡¡the¡¡following¡¡
pages£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡while¡¡¡¡¡¡Tolstoy£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Dumas£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Balzac£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡George¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Sand£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Victor¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Hugo£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡De¡¡
Vigny£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Prosper¡¡¡¡¡¡Merimee£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Flaubert£»¡¡Theophile¡¡¡¡¡¡Gautier£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Freytag£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Scheffel£»¡¡
Hauff£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Auerbach£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Manzoni£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Perez¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Galdos£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Merejkowski£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Topelius£»¡¡
Sienkiewicz£»¡¡and¡¡Jokai¡¡are£»¡¡perhaps£»¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡amongst¡¡those¡¡representing¡¡
Literatures¡¡other¡¡than¡¡our¡¡own¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Last¡¡¡¡¡¡Days¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡Pompeii£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Gladiators£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Hypatia£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Harold£»¡¨¡¡
¡¨Ivanhoe£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Talisman£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Maid¡¡¡¡¡¡Marian£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Last¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Barons£»¡¨¡¡
¡¨Quentin¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Durward£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Romola£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Cloister¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡Hearth£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡
Palace¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡King£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Westward¡¡¡¡¡¡Ho£¡¡¨£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Kenilworth£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Chaplet¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡
Pearls£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨A¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Gentleman¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡France£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨John¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Inglesant£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Three¡¡
Musketeers£»¡¨¡¡¡¨Twenty¡¡Years¡¡After£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Woodstock£»¡¨¡¡¡¨Peveril¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡Peak£»¡¨¡¡
¡¨Old¡¡¡¡¡¡Mortality£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡¡¡¡¡Betrothed¡¡¡¡¡¡Lovers¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨I¡¡¡¡¡¡Promessi¡¡¡¡¡¡Sposi¡¨£©£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Lorna¡¡
Doone£»¡¨¡¡¡¨The¡¡Refugees£»¡¨¡¡¡¨In¡¡the¡¡Golden¡¡Days£»¡¨¡¡¡¨The¡¡Courtship¡¡of¡¡Morice¡¡
Buckler£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Dorothy¡¡¡¡¡¡Forster£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Men¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Moss¡¡¡¡¡¡Hags£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Esmond£»¡¨¡¡
¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Virginians£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Heart¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡Midlothian£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Waverley£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Master¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡
Ballantrae£»¡¨¡¡¡¨Kidnapped£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Catriona£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡¡¡¡¡Chaplain¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Fleet£»¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨The¡¡
Seats¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Mighty£»¡¨¡¡¡¨Barnaby¡¡Rudge£»¡¨¡¡¡¨A¡¡Tale¡¡of¡¡Two¡¡Cities£»¡¨¡¡¡¨War¡¡and¡¡
Peace¡¨what¡¡visions¡¡do¡¡these¡¡mere¡¡titles¡¡arouse¡¡within¡¡many¡¡of¡¡us£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡And£»¡¡
though¡¡most¡¡of¡¡the¡¡books¡¡given¡¡in¡¡my¡¡list¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡described¡¡in¡¡the¡¡same¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡8¡¡
¡¡¡Page¡¡9¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡¡Guide¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Best¡¡Historical¡¡Novels¡¡and¡¡Tales¡¡
glowing¡¡terms¡¡as¡¡the¡¡masterpieces¡¡just¡¡named£»¡¡yet¡¡many¡¡¡¨nests¡¡of¡¡pleasant¡¡
thoughts¡¨¡¡may¡¡be¡¡formed¡¡through¡¡their¡¡panionship¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Hitherto¡¡allusion¡¡has¡¡been¡¡mainly¡¡in¡¡the¡¡direction¡¡of¡¡modern¡¡authors£»¡¡
and¡¡I¡¡would¡¡now¡¡say¡¡a¡¡word¡¡or¡¡two¡¡in¡¡regard¡¡to¡¡those¡¡of¡¡an¡¡earlier¡¡period¡¡
who¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡also¡¡¡¡¡¡represented¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Defoe£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Fielding£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Richardson£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Goldsmith£»¡¡
Smollett£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Frances¡¡¡¡¡¡Burney£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Samuel¡¡¡¡¡¡Lover£»¡¡¡¡¡¡John¡¡¡¡¡¡Galt£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Maria¡¡¡¡¡¡Edgeworth£»¡¡
Susan¡¡¡¡¡¡Ferrier£»¡¡¡¡¡¡William¡¡¡¡¡¡Godwin£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Mary¡¡¡¡¡¡Shelley£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Fennimore¡¡¡¡¡¡Cooper£»¡¡¡¡¡¡J¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡G¡£¡¡
Lockhart£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Leigh¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Hunt£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Thos¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Moore£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Harriet¡¡¡¡¡¡Martineau£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡J¡£¡¡¡¡L¡£¡¡¡¡Motley£»¡¡
Horace¡¡Smith£»¡¡Charles¡¡Lever£»¡¡Meadows¡¡Taylor£»¡¡and¡¡Wm¡£¡¡Carleton£»these¡¡
£¨in¡¡greater¡¡or¡¡less¡¡degree£©¡¡notable¡¡names¡¡were¡¡bound¡¡to¡¡have¡¡a¡¡place£»¡¡and£»¡¡
ing¡¡to¡¡less¡¡distinguished¡¡writers£»¡¡I¡¡may¡¡mention¡¡the¡¡brothers¡¡Banim£»¡¡
Gerald¡¡¡¡¡¡Griffin£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡S¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡C¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Hall£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Lady¡¡¡¡¡¡Morgan£»¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡sisters¡¡¡¡¡¡Porter£»¡¡¡¡¡¡W¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡G¡£¡¡
Simms£»¡¡¡¡¡¡George¡¡¡¡¡¡Croly£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Albert¡¡¡¡¡¡Smith£»¡¡¡¡¡¡G¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡R¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Gleig£»¡¡¡¡¡¡W¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡H¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Maxwell£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Sir¡¡
Arthur¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Helps£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Eliot¡¡¡¡¡¡Warburton£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Lewis¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Wingfield£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Thomas¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Miller£»¡¡¡¡¡¡C¡£¡¡
Macfarlane£»¡¡Grace¡¡Aguilar£»¡¡Anne¡¡Manning£»¡¡and¡¡Emma¡¡Robinson¡¡£¨author¡¡
of¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Whitefriars¡¨£©¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡To¡¡¡¡¡¡G¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡P¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡R¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡James£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Harrison¡¡¡¡¡¡Ainsworth£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡James¡¡
Grant¡¡I¡¡have¡¡previously¡¡alluded¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡It¡¡has¡¡been¡¡my¡¡endeavour¡¡to¡¡choose¡¡the¡¡
best¡¡examples¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡above¡named¡¡novelistsa¡¡task¡¡rendered¡¡specially¡¡
difficult¡¡in¡¡some¡¡cases¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡of¡¡immense¡¡literary¡¡output¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Doubtless¡¡
not¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡few¡¡¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡works¡¡so¡¡chosen¡¡¡¡¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡open¡¡to¡¡¡¡criticism£»¡¡¡¡but¡¡they¡¡¡¡will¡¡¡¡¡¡at¡¡
least¡¡serve¡¡to¡¡illustrate¡¡certain¡¡stages¡¡in¡¡the¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡Historical¡¡Romance¡£¡¡
With¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡exclusion¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Radcliffe£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Marsh£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Gore£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Lady¡¡
Blessington£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Lady¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Fullerton£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Bray£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡Mrs¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Child£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡few¡¡¡¡¡¡will£»¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡
imagine£»¡¡find¡¡fault£»¡¡but¡¡writers¡¡like¡¡Miss¡¡Tucker¡¡£¨A¡£¡¡L¡£¡¡O¡£¡¡E¡££©¡¡and¡¡Miss¡¡
Emily¡¡¡¡¡¡Holt¡¡¡¡¡¡still¡¡¡¡¡¡find¡¡¡¡¡¡so¡¡¡¡¡¡many¡¡¡¡¡¡readers¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡juvenile¡¡¡¡¡¡quarters£»¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡
required¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡¡¡certain¡¡¡¡¡¡amount¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡courage¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡place¡¡¡¡¡¡them¡¡¡¡¡¡also¡¡¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡my¡¡¡¡¡¡Index¡¡
Expurgatorius£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Turning¡¡once¡¡again¡¡to¡¡writers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sterner¡¡sex£»¡¡I¡¡have¡¡
ruled¡¡out¡¡C¡£¡¡R¡£¡¡Maturin£»¡¡G¡£¡¡W¡£¡¡M¡£¡¡Reynolds£»¡¡and¡¡Pierce¡¡Egan£»¡¡Junr¡££»¡¡and¡¡
£¨quitting¡¡the¡¡¡¨sensational¡¨¡¡for¡¡the¡¡¡¨mildly¡¡entertaining¡¨£©¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Rev¡£¡¡J¡£¡¡
M¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Neale's¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡many¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡historical¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡tales¡¡¡¡I¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡selected¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡only¡¡¡¡¡¡one¡¨Theodora¡¡
Phranza£»¡¨¡¡which£»¡¡besides¡¡being¡¡well¡¡written£»¡¡has¡¡the¡¡merit¡¡of¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡
a¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡somewhat¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡neglected¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡period¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Stories¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡possessing¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡a¡¡¡¡background¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡
History¡¡are¡¡to¡¡be¡¡found¡¡in¡¡¡¨Tales¡¡from¡¡Blackwood£»¡¨¡¡as¡¡also¡¡in¡¡¡¨Wilson's¡¡
Tales¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Borders£»¡¨¡¡but¡¡their¡¡extremely¡¡slight¡¡character¡¡seemed¡¡scarcely¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡9¡¡
¡¡¡Page¡¡10¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡A¡¡Guide¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Best¡¡Historical¡¡Novels¡¡and¡¡Tales¡¡
to¡¡¡¡¡¡justify¡¡¡¡insertion£»¡¡¡¡¡¡while¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡¡¡¡¡even¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡high¡¡¡¡¡¡literary¡¡¡¡position¡¡¡¡¡¡attained¡¡¡¡¡¡by¡¡
him¡¡¡¡¡¡on¡¡¡¡¡¡other¡¡¡¡¡¡grounds¡¡¡¡¡¡reconciled¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡me¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡either¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡Allan¡¡¡¡Cunningham's¡¡
novels¡¨Sir¡¡Michael¡¡Scott¡¨¡¡and¡¡¡¨Paul¡¡Jones¡£¡¨¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Of¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡Foreign¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡novelists¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡appearing¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡my¡¡¡¡¡¡list£»¡¡¡¡several¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡
already¡¡named£»¡¡¡¡but¡¡¡¡¡¡Marchese¡¡¡¡¡¡D'Azeglio£»¡¡¡¡F¡£¡¡¡¡D¡£¡¡¡¡Guerrazzi£»¡¡¡¡Cesare¡¡¡¡¡¡Cantu£»¡¡
¡¨W¡£¡¡Alexis¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨G¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Haring£©£»¡¡¡¡¡¡H¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Laube£»¡¡¡¡¡¡Louise¡¡¡¡¡¡Mulbach¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨Klara¡¡¡¡¡¡M¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡Mundt£©£»¡¡
Nicolas¡¡Josika£»¡¡Viktor¡¡Rydberg£»¡¡Hendrik¡¡Conscience£»¡¡Xavier¡¡B¡£¡¡Saintine£»¡¡
Amedee¡¡¡¡¡¡Achard£»¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¨Erckmann¡Chatrian¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡here¡¡¡¡¡¡call¡¡¡¡¡¡for¡¡¡¡¡¡notice¡¡¡¡¡¡as¡¡¡¡¡¡not¡¡
ing¡¡under¡¡strictly¡¡Contemporary¡¡classification¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡would¡¡forestall¡¡the¡¡
criticism¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡two¡¡¡¡¡¡writers¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡passed¡¡¡¡¡¡over¡¡¡¡¡¡whose¡¡¡¡¡¡fame¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡¡¡greater¡¡
than¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡any¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡those¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡just¡¡¡¡mentioned£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡viz¡££º¡¡¡¡¡¨Stendhal¡¨¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£¨Henri¡¡¡¡¡¡Beyle£©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡
Alphonse¡¡Daudet¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Beyle's¡¡¡¨La¡¡Chartreuse¡¡de¡¡Parme£»¡¨¡¡though¡¡containing¡¡
the¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡oft¡praised¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡account¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡Waterloo£»¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡is¡¡¡¡far¡¡¡¡¡¡more¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Psychological¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡than¡¡
Historical£»¡¡and¡¡Daudet's¡¡¡¨Robert¡¡Helmont£»¡¨¡¡while¡¡it¡¡depicts¡¡£¨under¡¡Diary¡¡
form£©¡¡¡¡¡¡certain¡¡¡¡¡¡aspects¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Franco¡German¡¡¡¡¡¡War£»¡¡¡¡¡¡has¡¡¡¡¡¡hardly¡¡¡¡¡¡any¡¡¡¡¡¡plot¡¡
running¡¡¡¡¡¡through¡¡¡¡¡¡it¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡As¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡Waterloo¡¡¡¡¡¡and¡¡¡¡¡¡Franco¡German¡¡¡¡¡¡War¡¡¡¡¡¡periods¡¡
were¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡amply¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡illustrated¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡numerous¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡other¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡novels¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡more¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡assured¡¡
suitability£»¡¡I¡¡had¡¡the¡¡less¡¡hesitation¡¡in¡¡deciding¡¡against¡¡the¡¡two¡¡works¡¡just¡¡
named¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡In¡¡¡¡¡¡the¡¡¡¡¡¡selections¡¡¡¡¡¡from¡¡¡¡¡¡Foreign¡¡¡¡¡¡Historical¡¡¡¡¡¡Fiction¡¡¡¡¡¡nothing¡¡¡¡¡¡more¡¡
has¡¡been¡¡attempted¡¡than¡¡to¡¡include¡¡the¡¡leading¡¡examples£»¡¡most¡¡of¡¡these£»¡¡it¡¡
will¡¡be¡¡found£»¡¡have¡¡been¡¡translated¡¡into¡¡English¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Before¡¡leaving¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡of¡¡older¡¡writers£»¡¡it¡¡may¡¡be¡¡mentioned¡¡that¡¡
not¡¡a¡¡few¡¡of¡¡the¡¡works¡¡chosen¡¡to¡¡represent¡¡them¡¡are£»¡¡at¡¡the¡¡moment£»¡¡out¡¡of¡¡
print¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡To¡¡¡¡¡¡anyone¡¡¡¡¡¡objecting¡¡¡¡¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡something¡¡¡¡¡¡ought¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡have¡¡¡¡¡¡been¡¡¡¡¡¡done¡¡¡¡¡¡to¡¡
indicate¡¡this¡¡in¡¡each¡¡separate¡¡case£»¡¡I¡¡would¡¡urge¡¡that¡¡the¡¡¡¨out¡¡of¡¡print¡¨¡¡line¡¡
can¡¡never¡¡be¡¡drawn¡¡with¡¡precision¡¡in¡¡view¡¡of¡¡constant¡¡reprints¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡
of¡¡further¡¡extinctions¡£¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Perhaps¡¡this¡¡introduction¡¡may¡¡be¡¡most¡¡fitly¡¡concluded¡¡by¡¡something¡¡in¡¡
the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡apology¡¡for¡¡Historical¡¡Romance¡¡itself¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Not¡¡only¡¡has¡¡fault¡¡
been¡¡found¡¡with¡¡the¡¡deficiencies¡¡of¡¡unskilled¡¡authors¡¡in¡¡that¡¡department£»¡¡
but¡¡the¡¡question¡¡has¡¡been¡¡asked¡¡by¡¡one¡¡or¡¡two¡¡critics¡¡of¡¡standingWhat¡¡
right¡¡has¡¡the¡¡Historical¡¡Novel¡¡to¡¡exist¡¡at¡¡all£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡More¡¡often¡¡than¡¡not£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡
pointed¡¡out£»¡¡the¡¡Romancist¡¡gives¡¡us¡¡a¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡inaccuracies£»¡¡which£»¡¡while¡¡
they¡¡mislead¡¡the¡¡ignorant¡¡£¨i¡£e¡££»¡¡the¡¡majority£¿£©£»¡¡are¡¡an¡¡unpardonab