°®°®Ð¡ËµÍø > ÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > the boss and the machine >

µÚ17ÕÂ

the boss and the machine-µÚ17ÕÂ

С˵£º the boss and the machine ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ3500×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



voters¡¡to¡¡be¡¡duly¡¡registered¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡early¡¡laws¡¡were¡¡defective£»
and¡¡the¡¡rolls¡¡were¡¡easily¡¡padded¡£¡¡In¡¡most¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cities¡¡poll
lists¡¡were¡¡made¡¡by¡¡the¡¡party¡¡workers£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡name¡¡of¡¡each¡¡voter
was¡¡checked¡¡off¡¡as¡¡he¡¡voted¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡still¡¡impossible¡¡for¡¡the
voter¡¡to¡¡keep¡¡secret¡¡his¡¡ballot¡£¡¡The¡¡buyer¡¡of¡¡votes¡¡could¡¡tell
whether¡¡he¡¡got¡¡what¡¡he¡¡paid¡¡for£»¡¡the¡¡employer£»¡¡so¡¡disposed£»¡¡could
bully¡¡those¡¡dependent¡¡on¡¡him¡¡into¡¡voting¡¡as¡¡he¡¡wished£»¡¡and¡¡the
way¡¡was¡¡open¡¡to¡¡all¡¡manner¡¡of¡¡tricks¡¡in¡¡the¡¡printing¡¡of¡¡ballots
with¡¡misleading¡¡emblems£»¡¡or¡¡with¡¡certain¡¡names¡¡omitted£»¡¡or¡¡with¡¡a
mixture¡¡of¡¡candidates¡¡from¡¡various¡¡partiestricks¡¡that¡¡were
later¡¡forbidden¡¡by¡¡law¡¡but¡¡were¡¡none¡¡the¡¡less¡¡common¡£

Rather¡¡suddenly¡¡a¡¡great¡¡change¡¡came¡¡over¡¡election¡¡day¡£¡¡In¡¡1888
Kentucky¡¡adopted¡¡the¡¡Australian¡¡ballot¡¡for¡¡the¡¡city¡¡of
Louisville£»¡¡and¡¡Massachusetts¡¡adopted¡¡it¡¡for¡¡all¡¡state¡¡and¡¡local
elections¡£¡¡The¡¡Massachusetts¡¡statute¡¡provided¡¡that¡¡before¡¡an
election¡¡each¡¡political¡¡party¡¡should¡¡certify¡¡its¡¡nominees¡¡to¡¡the
Secretary¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Commonwealth¡£¡¡The¡¡State¡¡then¡¡printed¡¡the
ballots¡£¡¡All¡¡the¡¡nominees¡¡of¡¡all¡¡the¡¡parties¡¡were¡¡printed¡¡on¡¡one
sheet¡£¡¡Each¡¡office¡¡was¡¡placed¡¡in¡¡a¡¡separate¡¡column£»¡¡the
candidates¡¡in¡¡alphabetical¡¡order£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡names¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parties
following¡£¡¡Blank¡¡spaces¡¡were¡¡left¡¡for¡¡those¡¡who¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡vote
for¡¡others¡¡than¡¡the¡¡regular¡¡nominees¡£¡¡This¡¡form¡¡of¡¡ballot
prevented¡¡¡¨voting¡¡straight¡¨¡¡with¡¡a¡¡single¡¡mark¡£¡¡The¡¡voter£»¡¡in¡¡the
seclusion¡¡of¡¡a¡¡booth¡¡at¡¡the¡¡polling¡­place£»¡¡had¡¡to¡¡pick¡¡his
party's¡¡candidates¡¡from¡¡the¡¡numerous¡¡columns¡£

Indiana£»¡¡in¡¡1889£»¡¡adopted¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡statute¡¡but¡¡the¡¡ballot¡¡had
certain¡¡modifications¡¡to¡¡suit¡¡the¡¡needs¡¡of¡¡party¡¡orthodoxy¡£¡¡Here
the¡¡columns¡¡represented¡¡parties£»¡¡not¡¡offices¡£¡¡Each¡¡party¡¡had¡¡a
column¡£¡¡Each¡¡column¡¡was¡¡headed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡party¡¡name¡¡and¡¡its¡¡device£»
so¡¡that¡¡those¡¡who¡¡could¡¡not¡¡read¡¡could¡¡vote¡¡for¡¡the¡¡Rooster¡¡or
the¡¡Eagle¡¡or¡¡the¡¡Fountain¡£¡¡There¡¡was¡¡a¡¡circle¡¡placed¡¡under¡¡the
device£»¡¡and¡¡by¡¡making¡¡his¡¡mark¡¡in¡¡this¡¡circle¡¡the¡¡voter¡¡voted
straight¡£

Within¡¡eight¡¡years¡¡thirty¡­eight¡¡States¡¡and¡¡two¡¡Territories¡¡had
adopted¡¡the¡¡Australian¡¡or¡¡blanket¡¡ballot¡¡in¡¡some¡¡modified¡¡form¡£
It¡¡was¡¡but¡¡a¡¡step¡¡to¡¡the¡¡state¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡election¡¡machinery¡£
Some¡¡state¡¡officer£»¡¡usually¡¡the¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡State£»¡¡was
designated¡¡to¡¡see¡¡that¡¡the¡¡election¡¡laws¡¡were¡¡enforced¡£¡¡In¡¡New
York¡¡a¡¡State¡¡Commissioner¡¡of¡¡Elections¡¡was¡¡appointed¡£¡¡The
appointment¡¡of¡¡local¡¡inspectors¡¡and¡¡judges¡¡remained¡¡for¡¡a¡¡time¡¡in
the¡¡hands¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parties¡£¡¡But¡¡soon¡¡in¡¡several¡¡States¡¡even¡¡this
power¡¡was¡¡taken¡¡from¡¡them£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡trend¡¡now¡¡is¡¡towards
appointing¡¡all¡¡election¡¡officers¡¡by¡¡the¡¡central¡¡authority¡£¡¡These
officers¡¡also¡¡have¡¡complete¡¡charge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡registration¡¡of¡¡voters¡£
In¡¡some¡¡States£»¡¡like¡¡New¡¡York£»¡¡registration¡¡has¡¡become¡¡a¡¡rather
solemn¡¡procedure£»¡¡requiring¡¡the¡¡answering¡¡of¡¡many¡¡questions¡¡and
the¡¡signing¡¡of¡¡the¡¡voter's¡¡name£»¡¡all¡¡under¡¡the¡¡threat¡¡of¡¡perjury
if¡¡a¡¡wilful¡¡misrepresentation¡¡is¡¡made¡£

So¡¡passed¡¡out¡¡of¡¡the¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡party¡¡the¡¡preparation¡¡of¡¡the
ballot¡¡and¡¡the¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ballot¡¡on¡¡election¡¡day¡£¡¡Innumerable
rules¡¡have¡¡been¡¡laid¡¡down¡¡by¡¡the¡¡State¡¡for¡¡the¡¡conduct¡¡of
elections¡£¡¡The¡¡distribution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ballots£»¡¡their¡¡custody¡¡before
election£»¡¡the¡¡order¡¡of¡¡electional¡¡procedure£»¡¡the¡¡counting¡¡of¡¡the
ballots£»¡¡the¡¡making¡¡of¡¡returns£»¡¡the¡¡custody¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ballot¡­boxes£»
and¡¡all¡¡other¡¡necessary¡¡details£»¡¡are¡¡regulated¡¡by¡¡law¡¡under
official¡¡state¡¡supervision¡£¡¡The¡¡parties¡¡are¡¡allowed¡¡watchers¡¡at
the¡¡polls£»¡¡but¡¡these¡¡have¡¡no¡¡official¡¡standing¡£

If¡¡a¡¡Revolutionary¡¡Father¡¡could¡¡visit¡¡his¡¡old¡¡haunts¡¡on¡¡election
day£»¡¡he¡¡would¡¡be¡¡astonished¡¡at¡¡the¡¡sober¡¡decorum¡£¡¡In¡¡his¡¡time
elections¡¡lasted¡¡three¡¡days£»¡¡days¡¡filled¡¡with¡¡harangue£»¡¡with
drinking£»¡¡betting£»¡¡raillery£»¡¡and¡¡occasional¡¡encounters¡£¡¡Even
those¡¡whose¡¡memory¡¡goes¡¡back¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Civil¡¡War¡¡can¡¡contrast¡¡the
ballot¡¡peddling£»¡¡the¡¡soliciting£»¡¡the¡¡crowded¡¡noisy
polling¡­places£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡calm¡¡and¡¡quiet¡¡with¡¡which¡¡men¡¡deposit
their¡¡ballots¡¡today¡£¡¡For¡¡now¡¡every¡¡ballot¡¡is¡¡numbered¡¡and¡¡no¡¡one
is¡¡permitted¡¡to¡¡take¡¡a¡¡single¡¡copy¡¡from¡¡the¡¡room¡£¡¡Every¡¡voter
must¡¡prepare¡¡his¡¡ballot¡¡in¡¡the¡¡booth¡£¡¡And¡¡every¡¡polling¡­place¡¡is
an¡¡island¡¡of¡¡immunity¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sea¡¡of¡¡political¡¡excitement¡£

While¡¡the¡¡people¡¡were¡¡thus¡¡assuming¡¡control¡¡of¡¡the¡¡ballot£»¡¡they
were¡¡proceeding¡¡to¡¡gain¡¡control¡¡of¡¡their¡¡legislatures¡£¡¡In¡¡1890
Massachusetts¡¡enacted¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡anti¡­lobby¡¡laws¡£¡¡It¡¡has
served¡¡as¡¡a¡¡model¡¡for¡¡many¡¡other¡¡States¡£¡¡It¡¡provided¡¡that¡¡the
sergeant¡­at¡­arms¡¡should¡¡keep¡¡dockets¡¡in¡¡which¡¡were¡¡enrolled¡¡the
names¡¡of¡¡all¡¡persons¡¡employed¡¡as¡¡counsel¡¡or¡¡agents¡¡before
legislative¡¡committees¡£¡¡Each¡¡counsel¡¡or¡¡agent¡¡was¡¡further
compelled¡¡to¡¡state¡¡the¡¡length¡¡of¡¡his¡¡engagement£»¡¡the¡¡subjects¡¡or
bills¡¡for¡¡which¡¡he¡¡was¡¡employed£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡name¡¡and¡¡address¡¡of¡¡his
employer¡£

The¡¡first¡¡session¡¡after¡¡the¡¡passage¡¡of¡¡this¡¡law£»¡¡many¡¡of¡¡the
professional¡¡lobbyists¡¡refused¡¡to¡¡enroll£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡most¡¡notorious
ones¡¡were¡¡seen¡¡no¡¡more¡¡in¡¡the¡¡State¡¡House¡£¡¡The¡¡regular¡¡counsel¡¡of
railroads£»¡¡insurance¡¡companies£»¡¡and¡¡other¡¡interests¡¡signed¡¡the
proper¡¡docket¡¡and¡¡appeared¡¡for¡¡their¡¡clients¡¡in¡¡open¡¡committee
meetings¡£

The¡¡law¡¡made¡¡it¡¡the¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Commonwealth¡¡to
report¡¡to¡¡the¡¡law¡¡officers¡¡of¡¡the¡¡State£»¡¡for¡¡prosecution£»¡¡all
those¡¡who¡¡failed¡¡to¡¡comply¡¡with¡¡the¡¡act¡£¡¡Sixty¡­seven¡¡such
delinquents¡¡were¡¡reported¡¡the¡¡first¡¡year¡£¡¡The¡¡Grand¡¡Jury¡¡refused
to¡¡indict¡¡them£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡recalcitrants¡¡has¡¡gradually
diminished¡£

The¡¡experience¡¡of¡¡Massachusetts¡¡is¡¡not¡¡unique¡£¡¡Other¡¡States
passed¡¡more¡¡or¡¡less¡¡rigorous¡¡anti¡­lobby¡¡laws£»¡¡and¡¡today£»¡¡in¡¡no
state¡¡Capitol£»¡¡will¡¡the¡¡visitor¡¡see¡¡the¡¡disgusting¡¡sights¡¡that
were¡¡usual¡¡thirty¡¡years¡¡agoarrogant¡¡and¡¡coarse¡¡professional
¡¨agents¡¨¡¡mingling¡¡on¡¡the¡¡floor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡legislature¡¡with¡¡members£»
even¡¡suggesting¡¡procedure¡¡to¡¡presiding¡¡officers£»¡¡and¡¡not
infrequently¡¡commandeering¡¡a¡¡majority¡£¡¡Such¡¡influences£»¡¡where
they¡¡persist£»¡¡have¡¡been¡¡driven¡¡under¡¡cover¡£

With¡¡the¡¡decline¡¡of¡¡the¡¡professional¡¡lobbyist¡¡came¡¡the¡¡rise¡¡of
the¡¡volunteer¡¡lobbyist¡£¡¡Important¡¡bills¡¡are¡¡now¡¡considered¡¡in
formal¡¡committee¡¡hearings¡¡which¡¡are¡¡well¡¡advertised¡¡so¡¡that
interested¡¡parties¡¡may¡¡be¡¡present¡£¡¡Publicity¡¡and¡¡information¡¡have
taken¡¡the¡¡place¡¡of¡¡secrecy¡¡in¡¡legislative¡¡procedure¡£¡¡The
gathering¡¡of¡¡expert¡¡testimony¡¡by¡¡special¡¡legislative¡¡commissions
of¡¡inquiry¡¡is¡¡now¡¡a¡¡frequent¡¡practice¡¡in¡¡respect¡¡to¡¡subjects¡¡of
wide¡¡social¡¡import£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡workmen's¡¡compensation£»¡¡widows'
pensions£»¡¡and¡¡factory¡¡conditions¡£

A¡¡number¡¡of¡¡States¡¡have¡¡resorted¡¡to¡¡the¡¡initiative¡¡and¡¡referendum
as¡¡applied¡¡to¡¡ordinary¡¡legislation¡£¡¡By¡¡means¡¡of¡¡this¡¡method¡¡a
small¡¡percentage¡¡of¡¡the¡¡voters£»¡¡from¡¡eight¡¡to¡¡ten¡¡per¡¡cent£»¡¡may
initiate¡¡proposals¡¡and¡¡impose¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡voters¡¡the¡¡function¡¡of
legislation¡£¡¡South¡¡Dakota£»¡¡in¡¡1898£»¡¡made¡¡constitutional¡¡provision
for¡¡direct¡¡legislation¡£¡¡Utah¡¡followed¡¡in¡¡1900£»¡¡Oregon¡¡in¡¡1902£»
Nevada¡¡in¡¡1904£»¡¡Montana¡¡in¡¡1906£»¡¡and¡¡Oklahoma¡¡in¡¡1907¡£¡¡East¡¡of
the¡¡Mississippi£»¡¡several¡¡States¡¡have¡¡adopted¡¡a¡¡modified¡¡form¡¡of
the¡¡initiative¡¡and¡¡referendum¡£¡¡In¡¡Oregon£»¡¡where¡¡this¡¡device¡¡of
direct¡¡government¡¡has¡¡been¡¡most¡¡assiduously¡¡applied£»¡¡the¡¡voters
in¡¡1908¡¡voted¡¡upon¡¡nineteen¡¡different¡¡bills¡¡and¡¡constitutional
amendments£»¡¡in¡¡1910¡¡the¡¡number¡¡increased¡¡to¡¡thirty¡­two£»¡¡in¡¡1912£»
to¡¡thirty¡­seven£»¡¡in¡¡1914¡¡it¡¡fell¡¡to¡¡twenty¡­nine¡£¡¡The¡¡vote¡¡cast
for¡¡these¡¡measures¡¡rarely¡¡exceeded¡¡eighty¡¡per¡¡cent¡¡of¡¡those
voting¡¡at¡¡the¡¡election¡¡and¡¡frequently¡¡fell¡¡below¡¡sixty¡£

The¡¡electorate¡¡that¡¡attempts¡¡to¡¡rid¡¡itself¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evils¡¡of¡¡the
state¡¡legislature¡¡by¡¡these¡¡heroic¡¡methods¡¡assumes¡¡a¡¡heavy
responsibility¡£¡¡When¡¡the¡¡burden¡¡of¡¡direct¡¡legislation¡¡is¡¡added¡¡to
the¡¡task¡¡of¡¡choosing¡¡from¡¡the¡¡long¡¡list¡¡of¡¡elective¡¡officers
which¡¡is¡¡placed¡¡before¡¡the¡¡voter¡¡at¡¡every¡¡local¡¡and¡¡state
election£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡surprising¡¡that¡¡there¡¡should¡¡set¡¡in¡¡a
reaction¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡simplified¡¡government¡£¡¡The¡¡mere¡¡separation
of¡¡state¡¡and¡¡local¡¡elections¡¡does¡¡not¡¡solve¡¡the¡¡problem¡£¡¡It
somewhat¡¡minimizes¡¡the¡¡chances¡¡of¡¡partizan¡¡influence¡¡over¡¡the
voter¡¡in¡¡local¡¡elections£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡voter¡¡is¡¡still¡¡confronted¡¡with
the¡¡long¡¡lists¡¡of¡¡candidates¡¡for¡¡elective¡¡offices¡£¡¡Ballots¡¡not
infrequently¡¡contain¡¡two¡¡hundred¡¡names£»¡¡sometimes¡¡even¡¡three
hundred¡¡or¡¡more£»¡¡covering¡¡candidates¡¡of¡¡four¡¡or¡¡five¡¡parties¡¡for
scores¡¡of¡¡offices¡£¡¡These¡¡blanket¡¡ballots¡¡are¡¡sometimes¡¡three¡¡feet
long¡£¡¡After¡¡an¡¡election¡¡in¡¡Chicago¡¡in¡¡1916£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡leading
dailies¡¡expressed¡¡sympathy¡¡¡¨for¡¡the¡¡voter¡¡emerging¡¡from¡¡the
polling¡­booth£»¡¡clutching¡¡a¡¡handful¡¡of¡¡papers£»¡¡one¡¡of¡¡them¡¡about
half¡¡as¡¡large¡¡as¡¡a¡¡bed¡¡sheet¡£¡¨¡¡Probably¡¡most¡¡voters¡¡were¡¡able¡¡to
express¡¡a¡¡real¡¡preference¡¡among¡¡the¡¡national¡¡candidates¡£¡¡It¡¡is
almost¡¡equally¡¡certain¡¡that¡¡most¡¡voters¡¡were¡¡not¡¡able¡¡to¡¡express
a¡¡real¡¡preference¡¡among¡¡important¡¡local¡¡administrative¡¡officials¡£
A¡¡huge¡¡ballot£»¡¡all¡¡printed¡¡over¡¡with¡¡names£»¡¡supplemented¡¡by¡¡a
series¡¡of¡¡smaller¡¡ballots£»¡¡can¡¡never¡¡be¡¡a¡¡manageable¡¡instrument
even¡¡for¡¡an¡¡electorate¡¡as¡¡intelligent¡¡as¡¡ours¡£

Simplification¡¡is¡¡the¡¡prophetic¡¡watchword¡¡in¡¡state¡¡government
today¡£¡¡For¡¡cities£»¡¡the¡¡City¡¡Manager¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Commission¡¡have
offered¡¡salvation¡£¡¡A¡¡few¡¡officers¡¡only¡¡are¡¡elected¡¡and¡¡these¡¡are
held¡¡strictly¡¡responsible£»¡¡sometimes¡¡under¡¡the¡¡constant¡¡threat¡¡of
the¡¡recall£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡entire¡¡administration¡£¡¡Over¡¡four¡¡hundred
cities¡¡have¡¡adopted¡¡the¡¡form¡¡of¡¡government¡¡by¡¡Commission¡£¡¡But
nothing¡¡has¡¡been¡¡done¡¡to¡¡simplify¡¡our¡¡state¡¡governments£»¡¡which
are¡¡surrounded¡¡by¡¡a¡¡maze¡¡of¡¡heterogeneous¡¡and¡¡undirected¡¡boards
and¡¡authorities¡£¡¡Every¡¡time¡¡the¡¡legislature¡¡found¡¡itself
confronted¡¡by¡¡a¡¡new¡¡function¡¡to¡¡be¡¡cared¡¡for£»¡¡it¡¡simply¡¡created¡¡a
new¡¡board¡£¡¡New¡¡York¡¡has¡¡a¡¡hodgepodge¡¡of¡¡over¡¡116¡¡such
authorities£»¡¡Minnesota£»¡¡75£»¡¡Illinois£»¡¡100¡£¡¡Iowa¡¡in¡¡1913¡¡and
Illinois¡¡and¡¡Minnesota¡¡in¡¡1914£»¡¡indeed£»¡¡perfected¡¡elaborate
proposals¡¡for¡¡simplifying¡¡their¡¡state¡¡governments¡£¡¡But¡¡these
suggestions¡¡remain¡¡dormant¡£¡¡And¡¡the¡¡New¡¡York¡¡State¡¡Constitutional
Convention¡¡in¡¡1915¡¡prepared¡¡a¡¡new¡¡Constitution¡¡for¡¡the¡¡State£»
with¡¡the¡¡same¡¡end¡¡in¡¡view£»¡¡but¡¡their¡¡work¡¡was¡¡not¡¡accepted¡¡by¡¡the
people¡£¡¡It¡¡may¡¡be¡¡said£»¡¡however£»¡¡that¡¡in¡¡our¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡rid
ourselves¡¡of¡¡boss¡¡rule¡¡we¡¡have¡¡swung¡¡through¡¡the¡¡arc¡¡of¡¡direct
government¡¡and¡¡are¡¡now¡¡on¡¡the¡¡returning¡¡curve¡¡toward
representative¡¡government£»¡¡a¡¡more¡¡intensified¡¡representative
government¡¡that¡¡makes¡¡evasion¡¡of¡¡responsibility¡¡and¡¡duty
impossible¡¡by¡¡fixing¡¡it¡¡upon¡¡one¡¡or¡¡two¡¡men¡£



CHAPTER¡¡X¡£¡¡PARTY¡¡REFORM

The¡¡State£»¡¡at¡¡first£»¡¡had¡¡paid¡¡little¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡the¡¡party£»
which¡¡was¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡a¡¡purely¡¡voluntary¡¡aggregation¡¡of
like¡­minded¡¡citizens¡£¡¡Evidently¡¡the¡¡State¡¡could¡¡not¡¡dictate¡¡that
you¡¡should¡¡be¡¡a¡¡Democrat¡¡or¡¡a¡¡Republican¡¡or¡¡force¡¡you¡¡to¡¡be¡¡an
Independent¡£¡¡With¡¡the¡¡adoption¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Australian¡¡ballot£»¡¡however£»
came¡¡the¡¡legal¡¡recognition¡¡of¡¡the¡¡party£»¡¡for¡¡as¡¡soon¡¡as¡¡the¡¡State
recognized¡¡the¡¡party's¡¡designated¡¡nominees¡¡in¡¡the¡¡preparation¡¡of
the¡¡official¡¡ballot£»¡¡it¡¡recognized¡¡the¡¡party¡£¡¡It¡¡was¡¡then
discovered¡¡that£»¡¡unless¡¡some¡¡restrictions¡¡were¡¡imposed£»¡¡groups¡¡of
interested¡¡persons¡¡in¡¡the¡¡old¡¡parties¡¡would¡¡manage¡¡the
nominations¡¡of¡¡both¡¡to¡¡their¡¡mutual¡¡satisfaction¡£¡¡Thus¡¡a¡¡handful
of¡¡Democrats¡¡would¡¡visit¡¡Republican¡¡caucuses¡¡or¡¡primaries¡¡and¡¡a
handful¡¡of¡¡Republicans¡¡would¡¡return¡¡the¡¡favor¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Democrats¡£
In¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡the¡¡bosses¡¡of¡¡both¡¡parties¡¡would¡¡cooperate¡¡in
order¡¡to¡¡secure¡¡nominations¡¡satisfactory¡¡to¡¡themselves¡£
Mas

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ