the prince-第4章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
e they can avenge themselves of lighter injuries； of more serious ones they cannot； therefore the injury that is to be done to a man ought to be of such a kind that one does not stand in fear of revenge。
But in maintaining armed men there in place of colonies one spends much more； having to consume on the garrison all the income from the state； so that the acquisition turns into a loss； and many more are exasperated； because the whole state is injured； through the shifting of the garrison up and down all become acquainted with hardship； and all become hostile； and they are enemies who； whilst beaten on their own ground； are yet able to do hurt。 For every reason； therefore； such guards are as useless as a colony is useful。
Again； the prince who holds a country differing in the above respects ought to make himself the head and defender of his less powerful neighbours； and to weaken the more powerful amongst them； taking care that no foreigner as powerful as himself shall； by any accident； get a footing there； for it will always happen that such a one will be introduced by those who are discontented； either through excess of ambition or through fear； as one has seen already。 The Romans were brought into Greece by the Aetolians； and in every other country where they obtained a footing they were brought in by the inhabitants。 And the usual course of affairs is that； as soon as a powerful foreigner enters a country； all the subject states are drawn to him； moved by the hatred which they feel against the ruling power。 So that in respect to those subject states he has not to take any trouble to gain them over to himself； for the whole of them quickly rally to the state which he has acquired there。 He has only to take care that they do not get hold of too much power and too much authority； and then with his own forces； and with their goodwill； he can easily keep down the more powerful of them； so as to remain entirely master in the country。 And he who does not properly manage this business will soon lose what he has acquired； and whilst he does hold it he will have endless difficulties and troubles。
The Romans； in the countries which they annexed； observed closely these measures； they sent colonies and maintained friendly relations with＇*＇ the minor powers； without increasing their strength； they kept down the greater； and did not allow any strong foreign powers to gain authority。 Greece appears to me sufficient for an example。 The Achaeans and Aetolians were kept friendly by them； the kingdom of Macedonia was humbled； Antiochus was driven out； yet the merits of the Achaeans and Aetolians never secured for them permission to increase their power； nor did the persuasions of Philip ever induce the Romans to be his friends without first humbling him； nor did the influence of Antiochus make them agree that he should retain any lordship over the country。 Because the Romans did in these instances what all prudent princes ought to do； who have to regard not only present troubles； but also future ones； for which they must prepare with every energy； because； when foreseen； it is easy to remedy them； but if you wait until they approach； the medicine is no longer in time because the malady has become incurable； for it happens in this； as the physicians say it happens in hectic fever； that in the beginning of the malady it is easy to cure but difficult to detect； but in the course of time； not having been either detected or treated in the beginning； it becomes easy to detect but difficult to cure。 This it happens in affairs of state； for when the evils that arise have been foreseen （which it is only given to a wise man to see）； they can be quickly redressed； but when； through not having been foreseen； they have been permitted to grow in a way that every one can see them； there is no longer a remedy。 Therefore； the Romans； foreseeing troubles； dealt with them at once； and； even to avoid a war； would not let them come to a head； for they knew that war is not to be avoided； but is only to be put off to the advantage of others； moreover they wished to fight with Philip and Antiochus in Greece so as not to have to do it in Italy； they could have avoided both； but this they did not wish； nor did that ever please them which is for ever in the mouths of the wise ones of our time：Let us enjoy the benefits of the timebut rather the benefits of their own valour and prudence； for time drives everything before it； and is able to bring with it good as well as evil； and evil as well as good。
＇*＇ See remark in the introduction on the word 〃intrattenere。〃
But let us turn to France and inquire whether she has done any of the things mentioned。 I will speak of Louis＇*＇ （and not of Charles＇＋＇） as the one whose conduct is the better to be observed； he having held possession of Italy for the longest period； and you will see that he has done the opposite to those things which ought to be done to retain a state composed of divers elements。
＇*＇ Louis XII； King of France； 〃The Father of the People；〃 born 1462； died 1515。
＇＋＇ Charles VIII； King of France； born 1470； died 1498。
King Louis was brought into Italy by the ambition of the Venetians； who desired to obtain half the state of Lombardy by his intervention。 I will not blame the course taken by the king； because； wishing to get a foothold in Italy； and having no friends thereseeing rather that every door was shut to him owing to the conduct of Charleshe was forced to accept those friendships which he could get； and he would have succeeded very quickly in his design if in other matters he had not made some mistakes。 The king； however； having acquired Lombardy； regained at once the authority which Charles had lost： Genoa yielded； the Florentines became his friends； the Marquess of Mantua； the Duke of Ferrara； the Bentivogli； my lady of Forli； the Lords of Faenza； of Pesaro； of Rimini； of Camerino； of Piombino； the Lucchese； the Pisans； the Sieneseeverybody made advances to him to become his friend。 Then could the Venetians realize the rashness of the course taken by them； which； in order that they might secure two towns in Lombardy； had made the king master of two…thirds of Italy。
Let any one now consider with that little difficulty the king could have maintained his position in Italy had he observed the rules above laid down； and kept all his friends secure and protected； for although they were numerous they were both weak and timid； some afraid of the Church； some of the Venetians； and thus they would always have been forced to stand in with him； and by their means he could easily have made himself secure against those who remained powerful。 But he was no sooner in Milan than he did the contrary by assisting Pope Alexander to occupy the Romagna。 It never occurred to him that by this action he was weakening himself； depriving himself of friends and of those who had thrown themselves into his lap； whilst he aggrandized the Church by adding much temporal power to the spiritual； thus giving it greater authority。 And having committed this prime error； he was obliged to follow it up； so much so that； to put an end to the ambition of Alexander； and to prevent his becoming the master of Tuscany； he was himself forced to come into Italy。
And as if it were not enough to have aggrandized the Church； and deprived himself of friends； he； wishing to have the kingdom of Naples； divides it with the King of Spain； and where he was the prime arbiter in Italy he takes an associate； so that the ambitious of that country and the malcontents of his own should have somewhere to shelter； and whereas he could have left in the kingdom his own pensioner as king； he drove him out； to put one there who was able to drive him； Louis； out in turn。
The wish to acquire is in truth very natural and common； and men always do so when they can； and for this they will be praised not blamed； but when they cannot do so； yet wish to do so by any means； then there is folly and blame。 Therefore； if France could have attacked Naples with her own forces she ought to have done so； if she could not； then she ought not to have divided it。 And if the partition which she made with the Venetians in Lombardy was justified by the excuse that by it she got a foothold in Italy； this other partition merited blame； for it had not the excuse of that necessity。
Therefore Louis made these five errors： he destroyed the minor powers； he increased the strength of one of the greater powers in Italy； he brought in a foreign power； he did not settle in the country； he did not send colonies。 Which errors； had he lived； were not enough to injure him had he not made a sixth by taking away their dominions from the Venetians； because； had he not aggrandized the Church； nor brought Spain into Italy； it would have been very reasonable and necessary to humble them； but having first taken these steps； he ought never to have consented to their ruin； for they； being powerful； would always have kept off others from designs on Lombardy； to which the Venetians would never have consented except to become masters themselves there； also because the others would not wish to take Lombardy from France in order to give it to the Venetians； and to run counter to both they would not have had the courage。
And if any one should say： 〃King Louis yielded the Romagna to Alexander and the kingdom to Spain to avoid war； I answer for the reasons given above that a blunder ought never to be perpetrated to avoid war； because it is not to be avoided； but is only deferred to your disadvantage。 And if another should allege the pledge which the king had given to the Pope that he would assist him in the enterprise； in exchange for the dissolution of his marriage＇*＇ and for the cap to Rouen；＇＋＇ to that I reply what I shall write later on concerning the faith of princes； and how it ought to be kept。
＇*＇ Louis XII divorced his wife； Jeanne； daughter of Louis XI； and married in 1499 Anne of Brittany； widow of Charles VIII； in order to retain the Duchy of Brittany for the crown。
＇＋＇ The Archbishop of Rouen。 He was Georges d'Amboise； created a cardinal by Alexander VI。 Born 1460； died 1510。
Thus King Louis lost Lombardy by not having followed any of the conditions observed by those who have taken possession of countries and wished to retain them。 Nor is there any miracle in this； but much that is reasonable and quite natural。 And on these matters I spoke at Nantes with Rouen； when Valentino； as Cesare Borgia； the son of Pope Alexander； was usually called； occupied the Romagna； and on Cardinal Rouen observing to me that the Italians did not understand war； I replied to him that the French did not understand statecraft； meaning that otherwise they would not have allowed the Church to reach such greatness。 And in fact is has been seen that the greatness of the Church and of Spain in Italy has been caused by France； and her ruin may be attributed to them。 From this a general rule is drawn which never or rarely fails： that he who is the cause of another becoming powerful is ruined； because that predominancy has been brought about either by astuteness or else by force； and both are distrusted by him who has been raised to power。
CHAPTER IV
WHY THE KINGDOM OF DARIUS； CONQUERED BY ALE
