lecture19-第5章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
'321' Op。 cit。; Letter XXX。
We heard in previous lectures of the vivified face of the world
as it may appear to converts after their awakening。'322' As a
rule; religious persons generally assume that whatever natural
facts connect themselves in any way with their destiny are
significant of the divine purposes with them。 Through prayer
the purpose; often far from obvious; comes home to them; and if
it be 〃trial;〃 strength to endure the trial is given。 Thus at
all stages of the prayerful life we find the persuasion that in
the process of communion energy from on high flows in to meet
demand; and becomes operative within the phenomenal world。 So
long as this operativeness is admitted to be real; it makes no
essential difference whether its immediate effects be subjective
or objective。 The fundamental religious point is that in prayer;
spiritual energy; which otherwise would slumber; does become
active; and spiritual work of some kind is effected really。
'322' Above; p。 243 ff。 Compare the withdrawal of expression
from the world; in Melancholiacs; p。 148。
So much for Prayer; taken in the wide sense of any kind of
communion。 As the core of religion; we must return to it in the
next lecture。
The last aspect of the religious life which remains for me to
touch upon is the fact that its manifestations so frequently
connect themselves with the subconscious part of our existence。
You may remember what I said in my opening lecture'323' about the
prevalence of the psychopathic temperament in religious
biography。 You will in point of fact hardly find a religious
leader of any kind in whose life there is no record of
automatisms。 I speak not merely of savage priests and prophets;
whose followers regard automatic utterance and action as by
itself tantamount to inspiration; I speak of leaders of thought
and subjects of intellectualized experience。 Saint Paul had his
visions; his ecstasies; his gift of tongues; small as was the
importance he attached to the latter。 The whole array of
Christian saints and heresiarchs; including the greatest; the
Barnards; the Loyolas; the Luthers; the Foxes; the Wesleys; had
their visions; voices; rapt conditions; guiding impressions; and
〃openings。〃 They had these things; because they had exalted
sensibility; and to such things persons of exalted sensibility
are liable。 In such liability there lie; however; consequences
for theology。 Beliefs are strengthened wherever automatisms
corroborate them。 Incursions from beyond the transmarginal
region have a peculiar power to increase conviction。 The
inchoate sense of presence is infinitely stronger than
conception; but strong as it may be; it is seldom equal to the
evidence of hallucination。 Saints who actually see or hear their
Saviour reach the acme of assurance。 Motor automatisms; though
rarer; are; if possible; even more convincing than sensations。
The subjects here actually feel themselves played upon by powers
beyond their will。 The evidence is dynamic; the God or spirit
moves the very organs of their body。'324'
'323' Above; pp。 25; 26。
'324' A friend of mine; a first…rate psychologist; who is a
subject of graphic automatism; tells me that the appearance of
independent actuation in the movements of his arm; when he writes
automatically; is so distinct that it obliges him to abandon a
psychophysical theory which he had previously believed in; the
theory; namely; that we have no feeling of the discharge
downwards of our voluntary motor…centres。 We must normally have
such a feeling; he thinks; or the SENSE OF AN ABSENCE would not
be so striking as it is in these experiences。 Graphic automatism
of a fully developed kind is rare in religious history; so far as
my knowledge goes。 Such statements as Antonia Bourignon's; that
〃I do nothing but lend my hand and spirit to another power than
mine;〃 is shown by the context to indicate inspiration rather
than directly automatic writing。 In some eccentric sects this
latter occurs。 The most striking instance of it is probably the
bulky volume called; 〃Oahspe; a new Bible in the Words of Jehovah
and his angel ambassadors;〃 Boston and London; 1891; written and
illustrated automatically by Dr。 Newbrough of New York; whom I
understand to be now; or to have been lately; at the head of the
spiritistic community of Shalam in New Mexico。 The latest
automatically written book which has come under my notice is
〃Zertouhem's Wisdom of the Ages;〃 by George A。 Fuller; Boston;
1901。
The great field for this sense of being the instrument of a
higher power is of course 〃inspiration。〃 It is easy to
discriminate between the religious leaders who have been
habitually subject to inspiration and those who have not。 In the
teachings of the Buddha; of Jesus; of Saint Paul (apart from his
gift of tongues); of Saint Augustine; of Huss; of Luther; of
Wesley; automatic or semi…automatic composition appears to have
been only occasional。 In the Hebrew prophets; on the contrary;
in Mohammed; in some of the Alexandrians; in many minor Catholic
saints; in Fox; in Joseph Smith; something like it appears to
have been frequent; sometimes habitual。 We have distinct
professions of being under the direction of a foreign power; and
serving as its mouthpiece。 As regards the Hebrew prophets; it is
extraordinary; writes an author who has made a careful study of
them; to see
〃How; one after another; the same features are reproduced in the
prophetic books。 The process is always extremely different from
what it would be if the prophet arrived at his insight into
spiritual things by the tentative efforts of his own genius。
There is something sharp and sudden about it。 He can lay his
finger; so to speak; on the moment when it came。 And it always
comes in the form of an overpowering force from without; against
which he struggles; but in vain。 Listen; for instance; 'to' the
opening of the book of Jeremiah。 Read through in like manner the
first two chapters of the prophecy of Ezekiel。
〃It is not; however; only at the beginning of his career that the
prophet passes through a crisis which is clearly not self…
caused。 Scattered all through the prophetic writings are
expressions which speak of some strong and irresistible impulse
coming down upon the prophet; determining his attitude to the
events of his time; constraining his utterance; making his words
the vehicle of a higher meaning than their own。 For instance;
this of Isaiah's: 'The Lord spake thus to me with a strong
hand;'an emphatic phrase which denotes the overmastering nature
of the impulse'and instructed me that I should not walk in the
way of this people。' 。 。 。 Or passages like this from Ezekiel:
'The hand of the Lord God fell upon me;' 'The hand of the Lord
was strong upon me。' The one standing characteristic of the
prophet is that he speaks with the authority of Jehovah himself。
Hence it is that the prophets one and all preface their addresses
so confidently; 'The Word of the Lord;' or 'Thus saith the Lord。'
They have even the audacity to speak in the first person; as if
Jehovah himself were speaking。 As in Isaiah: 'Hearken unto me;
O Jacob; and Israel my called; I am He; I am the First; I also am
the last;'and so on。 The personality of the prophet sinks
entirely into the background; he feels himself for the time being
the mouthpiece of the Almighty。〃'325'
'325' W。 Sanday: The Oracles of God; London; 1892; pp。 49…56;
abridged。
〃We need to remember that prophecy was a profession; and that the
prophets formed a professional class。 There were schools of the
prophets; in which the gift was regularly cultivated。 A group of
young men would gather round some commanding figurea Samuel or
an Elishaand would not only record or spread the knowledge of
his sayings and doings; but seek to catch themselves something of
his inspiration。 It seems that music played its part in their
exercises。 。 。 。 It is perfectly clear that by no means all of
these Sons of the prophets ever succeeded in acquiring more than
a very small share in the gift which they sought。 It was clearly
possible to 'counterfeit' prophecy。 Sometimes this was done
deliberately。 。 。 。 But it by no means follows that in all cases
where a false message was given; the giver of it was altogether
conscious of what he was doing。'326'
'326' Op。 cit。; p。 91。 This author also cites Moses's and
Isaiah's commissions; as given in Exodus; chaps。 iii。 and iv。;
and Isaiah; chap。 vi。
Here; to take another Jewish case; is the way in which Philo of
Alexandria describes his inspiration:
〃Sometimes; when I have come to my work empty; I have suddenly
become full; ideas being in an invisible manner showered upon me;
and implanted in me from on high; so that through the influence
of divine inspiration; I have become greatly excited; and have
known neither the place in which I was; nor those who were
present; nor myself; nor what I was saying; nor what I was
writing; for then I have been conscious of a richness of
interpretation; an enjoyment of light; a most penetrating
insight; a most manifest energy in all that was to be done;
having such effect on my mind as the clearest ocular
demonstration would have on the eyes。〃'327'
'327' Quoted by Augustus Clissold: The Prophetic Spirit in
Genius and Madness; 1870; p。 67。 Mr。 Clissold is a
Swedenborgian。 Swedenborg's case is of course the palmary one of
audita et visa; serving as a basis of religious revelation。
If we turn to Islam; we find that Mohammed's revelations all came
from the subconscious sphere。 To the question in what way he got
them
〃Mohammed is said to have answered that sometimes he heard a
knell as from a bell; and that this had the strongest effect on
him; and when the angel went away; he had received the
revelation。 Sometimes again he held converse with the angel as
with a man; so as easily to understand his words。 The later
authorities; however; 。 。 。 distinguish still other kinds。 In
the Itgan (103) the follo