north america-2-第11章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


he　ruin　to　those　efforts　which　arises　from　the　malice　of　the　abolitionists。　　To　all　this　you　make　some　answer　with　your　tongue　that　is　hardly　truefor　in　such　a　matter　courtesy　forbids　the　plain　truth。　　But　your　heart　within　answers　truly；　〃Madam；　dear　madam；　your　sorrow　is　great；　but　that　sorrow　is　the　necessary　result　of　your　position。〃　As　to　those　official　reasons；　in　what　fewest　words　I　can　use　I　will　endeavor　to　show　that　they　come　to　nothing。　　The　tariffand　a　monstrous　tariff　it　then　waswas　the　ground　put　forward　by　South　Carolina　for　secession　when　General　Jackson　was　President　and　Mr。　Calhoun　was　the　hero　of　the　South。　　Calhoun　bound　himself　and　his　State　to　take　certain　steps　toward　secession　at　a　certain　day　if　that　tariff　were　not　abolished。　　The　tariff　was　so　absurd　that　Jackson　and　his　government　were　forced　to　abandon　itwould　have　abandoned　it　without　any　threat　from　Calhoun；　but　under　that　threat　it　was　necessary　that　Calhoun　should　be　defied。　　General　Jackson　proposed　a　compromise　tariff；　which　was　odious　to　Calhounnot　on　its　own　behalf；　for　it　yielded　nearly　all　that　was　asked；　but　as　being　subversive　of　his　desire　for　secession。　　The　President；　however；　not　only　insisted　on　his　compromise；　but　declared　his　purpose　of　preventing　its　passage　into　law　unless　Calhoun　himself；　as　Senator；　would　vote　for　it。　　And　he　also　declared　his　purpose　not；　we　may　presume；　officiallyof　hanging　Calhoun；　if　he　took　that　step　toward　secession　which　he　had　bound　himself　to　take　in　the　event　of　the　tariff　not　being　repealed。　　As　a　result　of　all　this　Calhoun　voted　for　the　compromise；　and　secession　for　the　time　was　beaten　down。　　That　was　in　1832；　and　may　be　regarded　as　the　commencement　of　the　secession　movement。　　The　tariff　was　then　a　convenient　reason；　a　ground　to　be　assigned　with　a　color　of　justice　because　it　was　a　tariff　admitted　to　be　bad。　　But　the　tariff　has　been　modified　again　and　again　since　that；　and　the　tariff　existing　when　South　Carolina　seceded　in　1860　had　been　carried　by　votes　from　South　Carolina。　　The　absurd　Morrill　tariff　could　not　have　caused　secession；　for　it　was　passed；　without　a　struggle；　in　the　collapse　of　Congress　occasioned　by　secession。　The　bounty　to　fishermen　was　given　to　create　sailors；　so　that　a　marine　might　be　provided　for　the　nation。　　I　need　hardly　show　that　the　national　benefit　would　accrue　to　the　whole　nation　for　whose　protection　such　sailors　were　needed。　　Such　a　system　of　bounties　may　be　bad；　but　if　so；　it　was　bad　for　the　whole　nation。　　It　did　not　affect　South　Carolina　otherwise　than　it　affected　Illinois；　Pennsylvania；　or　even　New　York。　The　navigation　laws　may　also　have　been　bad。　　According　to　my　thinking　such　protective　laws　are　bad；　but　they　created　no　special　hardship　on　the　South。　　By　any　such　a　theory　of　complaint　all　sections　of　all　nations　have　ground　of　complaint　against　any　other　section　which　receives　special　protection　under　any　law。　　The　drinkers　of　beer　in　England　should　secede　because　they　pay　a　tax；　whereas　the　consumers　of　paper　pay　none。　　The　navigation　laws　of　the　States　are　no　doubt　injurious　to　the　mercantile　interests　of　the　States。　　I　at　least　have　no　doubt　on　the　subject。　　But　no　one　will　think　that　secession　is　justified　by　the　existence　of　a　law　of　questionable　expediency。　　Bad　laws　will　go　by　the　board　if　properly　handled　by　those　whom　they　pinch；　as　the　navigation　laws　went　by　the　board　with　us　in　England。　As　to　that　Fugitive　Slave　Law；　it　should　be　explained　that　the　grievance　has　not　arisen　from　the　loss　of　slaves。　　I　have　heard　it　stated　that　South　Carolina；　up　to　the　time　of　the　secession；　had　never　lost　a　slave　in　this　waythat　is；　by　Northern　opposition　to　the　Fugitive　Slave　Law；　and　that　the　total　number　of　slaves　escaping　successfully　into　the　Northern　States；　and　there　remaining　through　the　non…operation　of　this　law；　did　not　amount　to　five　in　the　year。　It　has　not　been　a　question　of　property；　but　of　feeling。　　It　has　been　a　political　point；　and　the　South　has　conceivedand　probably　conceived　trulythat　this　resolution　on　the　part　of　Northern　States　to　defy　the　law　with　reference　to　slaves；　even　though　in　itself　it　might　not　be　immediately　injurious　to　Southern　property；　was　an　insertion　of　the　narrow　end　of　the　wedge。　　It　was　an　action　taken　against　slaveryan　action　taken　by　men　of　the　North　against　their　fellow…countrymen　in　the　South。　　Under　such　circumstances；　the　sooner　such　countrymen　should　cease　to　be　their　fellows　the　better　it　would　be　for　them。　　That；　I　take　it；　was　the　argument　of　the　South；　or　at　any　rate　that　was　its　feeling。　I　have　said　that　the　reasons　given　for　secession　have　been　trifling；　and　among　them　have　so　estimated　this　matter　of　the　Fugitive　Slave　Law。　　I　mean　to　assert　that　the　ground　actually　put　forward　is　triflingthe　loss；　namely；　of　slaves　to　which　the　South　has　been　subjected。　　But　the　true　reason　pointed　at　in　thisthe　conviction；　namely；　that　the　North　would　not　leave　slavery　alone；　and　would　not　allow　it　to　remain　as　a　settled　institutionwas　by　no　means　trifling。　　It　has　been　this　conviction　on　the　part　of　the　South　that　the　North　would　not　live　in　amity　with　slaverywould　continue　to　fight　it　under　this　banner　or　under　that；　would　still　condemn　it　as　disgraceful　to　men　and　rebuke　it　as　impious　before　Godwhich　has　produced　rebellion　and　civil　war；　and　will　ultimately　produce　that　division　for　which　the　South　is　fighting　and　against　which　the　North　is　fighting；　and　which；　when　accomplished；　will　give　the　North　new　wings；　and　will　leave　the　South　without　political　greatness　or　commercial　success。　Under　such　circumstances　I　cannot　think　that　rebellion　on　the　part　of　the　South　was　justified　by　wrongs　endured；　or　made　reasonable　by　the　prospect　of　wrongs　to　be　inflicted。　　It　is　disagreeable；　that　having　to　live　with　a　wife　who　is　always　rebuking　one　for　some　special　fault；　but　the　outside　world　will　not　grant　a　divorce　on　that　account；　especially　if　the　outside　world　is　well　aware　that　the　fault　so　rebuked　is　of　daily　occurrence。　　〃If　you　do　not　choose　to　be　called　a　drunkard　by　your　wife；〃　the　outside　world　will　say；　〃it　will　be　well　that　you　should　cease　to　drink。〃　　Ah！　but　that　habit　of　drinking；　when　once　acquired；　cannot　easily　be　laid　aside。　　The　brain　will　not　work；　the　organs　of　the　body　will　not　perform　their　functions；　the　blood　will　not　run。　　The　drunkard　must　drink　till　he　dies。　　All　that　may　be　a　good　ground　for　divorce；　the　outside　world　will　say；　but　the　plea　should　be　put　in　by　the　sober　wife；　not　by　the　intemperate　husband。　　But　what　if　the　husband　takes　himself　off　without　any　divorce；　and　takes　with　him　also　his　wife's　property；　her　earnings；　that　on　which　he　has　lived　and　his　children？　　It　may　be　a　good　bargain　still　for　her；　the　outside　world　will　say；　but　she；　if　she　be　a　woman　of　spirit；　will　not　willingly　put　up　with　such　wrongs。　　The　South　has　been　the　husband　drunk　with　slavery；　and　the　North　has　been　the　ill…used　wife。　Rebellion；　as　I　have　said；　is　often　justifiable　but　it　is；　I　think；　never　justifiable　on　the　part　of　a　paid　servant　of　that　government　against　which　it　is　raised。　　We　must；　at　any　rate；　feel　that　this　is　true　of　men　in　high　placesas　regards　those　men　to　whom　by　reason　of　their　offices　it　should　specially　belong　to　put　down　rebellion。　Had　Washington　been　the　governor　of　Virginia；　had　Cromwell　been　a　minister　of　Charles；　had　Garibaldi　held　a　marshal's　baton　under　the　Emperor　of　Austria　or　the　King　of　Naples；　those　men　would　have　been　traitors　as　well　as　rebels。　　Treason　and　rebellion　may　be　made　one　under　the　law；　but　the　mind　will　always　draw　the　distinction。　　I；　if　I　rebel　against　the　Crown；　am　not　on　that　account　necessarily　a　traitor。　　A　betrayal　of　trust　is；　I　take　it；　necessary　to　treason。　I　am　not　aware　that　Jefferson　Davis　is　a　traitor；　but　that　Buchanan　was　a　traitor　admits；　I　think；　of　no　doubt。　　Under　him；　and　with　his　connivance；　the　rebellion　was　allowed　to　make　its　way。　　Under　him；　and　by　his　officers；　arms　and　ships　and　men　and　money　were　sent　away　from　those　points　at　which　it　was　known　that　they　would　be　needed；　if　it　were　intended　to　put　down　the　coming　rebellion；　and　to　those　points　at　which　it　was　known　that　they　would　be　needed；　if　it　were　intended　to　foster　the　coming　rebellion。　　But　Mr。　Buchanan　had　no　eager　feeling　in　favor　of　secession。　　He　was　not　of　that　stuff　of　which　are　made　Davis；　and　Toombs；　and　Slidell。　　But　treason　was　easier　to　him　than　loyalty。　　Remonstrance　was　made　to　him；　pointing　out　the　misfortunes　which　his　action；　or　want　of　action；　would　bring　upon　the　country。　　〃Not　in　my　time；〃　he　answered。　　〃It　will　not　be　in　my　time。〃　　So　that　he　might　escape　unscathed　out　of　the　fire；　this　chief　ruler　of　a　nation　of　thirty　millions　of　men　was　content　to　allow　treason　and　rebellion　to　work　their　way！　　I　venture　to　say　so　much　here　as　showing　how　impossible　it　was　that　Mr。　Lincoln's　government；　on　its　coming　into　office；　should　have　given　to　the　South；　not　what　the　South　had　asked；　for　the　South　had　not　asked；　but　what　the　South　had　taken；　what　the　South　had　tried　to　filch。　Had　the　South　waited　for　secession　till　Mr。　Lincoln　had　been　in　his　chair；　I　could　understand　that　England　should　sympathize　with　her。　For　myself　I　cannot　agree　to　that　scuttling　of　the　ship　by　the　captain　on　the　day　which　was　to　see　the　transfer　of　his　command　to　another　officer。　The　Southern　States　were　driven　into　rebellion　by　no　wrongs　inflicted　on　them；　but　their　desire　for　secession　is　not　on　that　account　matter　for　astonishment。　　It　would　have　been　surprising　had　they　not　desired　secession。　　Secession　of　one　kind；　a　very　practical　secession；　had　already　been　forced　upon　them　by　circumstances。　　They　had　become　a　separate　people；　dissevered　from　the　North　by　habits；　morals；　institutions；　pursuits；　and　every　conceivable　difference　in　their　modes　of　thought　and　action。　　They　still　spoke　the　same　language；　as　do　Austria　and　Prussia；　but　beyond　that　tie　of　language　they　had　no　bond　but　that　of　a　meager　political　union　in　their　Congress　at　Washington。　　Slavery；　as　it　had　been　expelled　from　the　North；　and　as　it　had　come　to　be　welcomed　in　the　South；　had　raised　such　a　wall　of　difference　that　true　political　union　was　out　of　the　question。　　It　would　be　juster；　perhaps；　to　say　that　those　physical　characteristics　of　the　South　which　had　induced　this　welcoming　of　slavery；　and　those　other　characteristics　of　the　North　which　had　induced　its　expulsion；　were　the　true　causes　of　the　difference。　　For　years　and　years　this　has　been　felt　by　both；　and　the　fight　has　been　going　on。　　It　has　been　continued　for　thirty　years；　and　almost　always　to　the　detriment　of　the　South。　　In　1845　Florida　and　Texas　were　admitted　into　the　Union　as　slave　States。　　I　think　that　no　State　had　then　been　admitted；　as　a　free　State；　since　Michigan；　in　1836。　　In　1846　Iowa　was　admitted　as　a　free　State；　and　from　that　day　to　this　Wisconsin；　California；　Minnesota；　Oregon；　and　Kansas　have　been　brought　into　the　Union；　all　as　free　States。　　The　annexation　of　another　slave　State　to　the　existing　Union　had　become；　I　imagine；　impossibleunless　such　object　were　gained　by　the　admission　of　Texas。　　We　all　remember　that　fight　about　Kansas；　and　what　sort　of　a　fight　it　was！　　Kansas　lies　alongside　of　Missouri；　a　slave　State；　and　is　contiguous　to　no　other　State。　　If　the　free…soil　party　could；　in　the　days