what is property-第3章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
music； fond of sculpture； all these are beautiful and good； but they cannot appease hunger； nor take the place of my pleasant readings of Bailly； Hume； and Tennemann； which I used to enjoy by my fireside when I was able to read。
〃But enough of complaints。 Do not allow this letter to affect you too much； and do not think that I give way to dejection or despondency； no； I am a fatalist； and I believe in my star。 I do not know yet what my calling is； nor for what branch of polite literature I am best fitted； I do not even know whether I am； or ever shall be； fitted for any： but what matters it？ I suffer； I labor； I dream； I enjoy； I think； and； in a word； when my last hour strikes； I shall have lived。
〃Proudhon； I love you； I esteem you； and； believe me； these are not mere phrases。 What interest could I have in flattering and praising a poor printer？ Are you rich； that you may pay for courtiers？ Have you a sumptuous table； a dashing wife； and gold to scatter； in order to attract them to your suite？ Have you the glory； honors； credit； which would render your acquaintance pleasing to their vanity and pride？ No； you are poor； obscure； abandoned； but； poor； obscure； and abandoned； you have a friend； and a friend who knows all the obligations which that word imposes upon honorable people； when they venture to assume it。 That friend is myself： put me to the test。 〃GUSTAVE FALLOT。〃
It appears from this letter that if； at this period； Proudhon had already exhibited to the eyes of a clairvoyant friend his genius for research and investigation； it was in the direction of philosophical； rather than of economical and social； questions。
Having become foreman in the house of Gauthier & Co。； who carried on a large printing establishment at Besancon； he corrected the proofs of ecclesiastical writers； the Fathers of the Church。 As they were printing a Bible； a Vulgate； he was led to compare the Latin with the original Hebrew。
〃In this way；〃 says Sainte Beuve； 〃he learned Hebrew by himself； and； as everything was connected in his mind； he was led to the study of comparative philology。 As the house of Gauthier published many works on Church history and theology； he came also to acquire； through this desire of his to investigate everything； an extensive knowledge of theology； which afterwards caused misinformed persons to think that he had been in an ecclesiastical seminary。〃
Towards 1836； Proudhon left the house of Gauthier； and； in company with an associate； established a small printing…office in Besancon。 His contribution to the partnership consisted； not so much in capital； as in his knowledge of the trade。 His partner committing suicide in 1838； Proudhon was obliged to wind up the business； an operation which he did not accomplish as quickly and as easily as he hoped。 He was then urged by his friends to enter the ranks of the competitors for the Suard pension。 This pension consisted of an income of fifteen hundred francs bequeathed to the Academy of Besancon by Madame Suard； the widow of the academician； to be given once in three years to the young man residing in the department of Doubs； a bachelor of letters or of science； and not possessing a fortune； whom the Academy of Besancon SHOULD DEEM BEST FITTED FOR A LITERARY OR SCIENTIFIC CAREER； OR FOR THE STUDY OF LAW OR OF MEDICINE。 The first to win the Suard pension was Gustave Fallot。 Mauvais； who was a distinguished astronomer in the Academy of Sciences； was the second。 Proudhon aspired to be the third。 To qualify himself； he had to be received as a bachelor of letters； and was obliged to write a letter to the Academy of Besancon。 In a phrase of this letter； the terms of which he had to modify； though he absolutely refused to change its spirit； Proudhon expressed his firm resolve to labor for the amelioration of the condition of his brothers； the working…men。
The only thing which he had then published was an 〃Essay on General Grammar；〃 which appeared without the author's signature。 While reprinting； at Besancon； the 〃Primitive Elements of Languages； Discovered by the Comparison of Hebrew roots with those of the Latin and French；〃 by the Abbe Bergier； Proudhon had enlarged the edition of his 〃Essay on General Grammar。〃
The date of the edition； 1837； proves that he did not at that time think of competing for the Suard pension。 In this work； which continued and completed that of the Abbe Bergier； Proudhon adopted the same point of view； that of Moses and of Biblical tradition。 Two years later； in February； 1839； being already in possession of the Suard pension； he addressed to the Institute； as a competitor for the Volney prize； a memoir entitled： 〃Studies in Grammatical Classification and the Derivation of some French words。〃 It was his first work； revised and presented in another form。 Four memoirs only were sent to the Institute； none of which gained the prize。 Two honorable mentions were granted； one of them to memoir No。 4； that is； to P。 J。 Proudhon； printer at Besancon。 The judges were MM。 Amedde Jaubert； Reinaud； and Burnouf。
〃The committee；〃 said the report presented at the annual meeting of the five academies on Thursday； May 2； 1839； 〃has paid especial attention to manuscripts No。 1 and No。 4。 Still； it does not feel able to grant the prize to either of these works； because they do not appear to be sufficiently elaborated。 The committee； which finds in No。 4 some ingenious analyses； particularly in regard to the mechanism of the Hebrew language； regrets that the author has resorted to hazardous conjectures； and has sometimes forgotten the special recommendation of the committee to pursue the experimental and comparative method。〃
Proudhon remembered this。 He attended the lectures of Eugene Burnouf； and； as soon as he became acquainted with the labors and discoveries of Bopp and his successors； he definitively abandoned an hypothesis which had been condemned by the Academy of Inscriptions and Belles…lettres。 He then sold； for the value of the paper； the remaining copies of the 〃Essay〃 published by him in 1837。 In 1850； they were still lying in a grocer's back…shop。
A neighboring publisher then placed the edition on the market； with the attractive name of Proudhon upon it。 A lawsuit ensued； in which the author was beaten。 His enemies； and at that time there were many of them； would have been glad to have proved him a renegade and a recanter。 Proudhon； in his work on 〃Justice；〃 gives some interesting details of this lawsuit。
In possession of the Suard pension； Proudhon took part in the contest proposed by the Academy of Besancon on the question of the utility of the celebration of Sunday。 His memoir obtained honorable mention； together with a medal which was awarded him； in open session； on the 24th of August； 1839。 The reporter of the committee； the Abbe Doney； since made Bishop of Montauban； called attention to the unquestionable superiority of his talent。
〃But；〃 says Sainte Beuve； 〃he reproached him with having adopted dangerous theories； and with having touched upon questions of practical politics and social organization； where upright intentions and zeal for the public welfare cannot justify rash solutions。〃
Was it policy； we mean prudence； which induced Proudhon to screen his ideas of equality behind the Mosaic law？ Sainte Beuve； like many others； seems to think so。 But we remember perfectly well that； having asked Proudhon； in August； 1848； if he did not consider himself indebted in some respects to his fellow… countryman； Charles Fourier； we received from him the following reply： 〃I have certainly read Fourier； and have spoken of him more than once in my works； but； upon the whole； I do not think that I owe anything to him。 My real masters； those who have caused fertile ideas to spring up in my mind； are three in number： first； the Bible； next； Adam Smith； and last； Hegel。
Freely confessed in the 〃Celebration of Sunday；〃 the influence of the Bible on Proudhon is no less manifest in his first memoir on property。 Proudhon undoubtedly brought to this work many ideas of his own； but is not the very foundation of ancient Jewish law to be found in its condemnation of usurious interest and its denial of the right of personal appropriation of land？
The first memoir on property appeared in 1840； under the title； 〃What is Property？ or an Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government。〃 Proudhon dedicated it； in a letter which served as the preface； to the Academy of Besancon。 The latter； finding itself brought to trial by its pensioner； took the affair to heart； and evoked it； says Sainte Beuve； with all possible haste。
The pension narrowly escaped being immediately withdrawn from the bold defender of the principle of equality of conditions。 M。 Vivien； then Minister of Justice； who was earnestly solicited to prosecute the author； wished first to obtain the opinion of the economist； Blanqui； a member of the Academy of Moral and Political Sciences。 Proudhon having presented to this academy a copy of his book； M。 Blanqui was appointed to review it。 This review； though it opposed Proudhon's views； shielded him。 Treated as a savant by M。 Blanqui； the author was not prosecuted。 He was always grateful to MM。 Blanqui and Vivien for their handsome conduct in the matter。
M。 Blanqui's review； which was partially reproduced by 〃Le Moniteur；〃 on the 7th of September； 1840； naturally led Proudhon to address to him； in the form of a letter； his second memoir on property； which appeared in April； 1841。 Proudhon had endeavored； in his first memoir； to demonstrate that the pursuit of equality of conditions is the true principle of right and of government。 In the 〃Letter to M。 Blanqui；〃 he passes in review the numerous and varied methods by which this principle gradually becomes realized in all societies； especially in modern society。
In 1842； a third memoir appeared； entitled； 〃A Notice to Proprietors； or a Letter to M。 Victor Considerant； Editor of ‘La Phalange；' in Reply to a Defence of Property。〃 Here the influence of Adam Smith manifested itself； and was frankly admitted。 Did not Adam Smith find； in the principle of equality； the first of all the laws which govern wages？ There are other laws； undoubtedly； but Proudhon considers them all as springing from the principle of property； as he defined it in his first memoir。 Thus； in humanity； there are two principles；one which leads us to equality； another which separates us from it。 By the former； we treat each other as associates； by the latter； as strangers； not to say enemies。 This distinction； which is constantly met with throughout the three memoirs； contained already； in germ； the idea which gave birth to the 〃System of Economical Contradictions；〃 which appeared in 1846； the idea of antinomy or contre…loi。
The 〃Notice to Proprietors〃 was seized by the magistrates of Besancon； and Proudhon was summoned to appear before the assizes of Doubs within a week。 He read his written defence to the jurors in person； and was acquitted。 The jury； like M。 Blanqui； viewed him only as a philosopher； an inquirer； a savant。
In 1843； Proudhon published the 〃Creation of Order in Humanity；〃 a large volume； which d
