unto this last-第8章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！





equivalent　time　and　labour　in　his　service　at　any　future　time　when



he　may　demand　it。（9*）



　　　　If　we　promise　to　give　him　less　labour　than　he　has　given　us；



we　under…pay　him。　If　we　promise　to　give　him　more　labour　than　he



has　given　us；　we　over…pay　him。　In　practice；　according　to　the　laws



of　demand　and　supply；　when　two　men　are　ready　to　do　the　work；　and



only　one　man　wants　to　have　it　done；　the　two　men　underbid　each



other　for　it；　and　the　one　who　gets　it　to　do；　is　under…paid。　But



when　two　men　want　the　work　done；　and　there　is　only　one　man　ready



to　do　it；　the　two　men　who　want　it　done　over…bid　each　other；　and



the　workman　is　over…paid。



　　　　I　will　examine　these　two　points　of　injustice　in　succession；



but　first　I　wish　the　reader　to　clearly　understand　the　central



principle；　lying　between　the　two；　of　right　or　just　payment。



　　　　When　we　ask　a　service　of　any　man；　he　may　either　give　it　us



freely；　or　demand　payment　for　it。　Respecting　free　gift　of



service；　there　is　no　question　at　present；　that　being　a　matter　of



affection　　not　of　traffic。　But　if　he　demand　payment　for　it；　and



we　wish　to　treat　him　with　absolute　equity；　it　is　evident　that



this　equity　can　only　consist　in　giving　time　for　time；　strength



for　strength；　and　skill　for　skill。　If　a　man　works　an　hour　for　us；



and　we　only　promise　to　work　half…an…hour　for　him　in　return；　we



obtain　an　unjust　advantage。　If；　on　the　contrary；　we　promise　to



work　an　hour　and　a　half　for　him　in　return；　he　has　an　unjust



advantage。　The　justice　consists　in　absolute　exchange；　or；　if



there　be　any　respect　to　the　stations　of　the　parties；　it　will　not



be　in　favour　of　the　employer：　there　is　certainly　no　equitable



reason　in　a　main's　being　poor；　that　if　he　give　me　a　pound　of



bread　to…day；　I　should　return　him　less　than　a　pound　of　bread



to…morrow；　or　any　equitable　reason　in　a　man's　being　uneducated；



that　if　he　uses　a　certain　quantity　of　skill　and　knowledge　in　my



service；　I　should　use　a　less　quantity　of　skill　and　knowledge　in



his。　Perhaps；　ultimately；　it　may　appear　desirable；　or；　to　say　the



least；　gracious；　that　I　should　give　in　return　somewhat　more　than



I　received。　But　at　present；　we　are　concerned　on　the　law　of



justice　only；　which　is　that　of　perfect　and　accurate　exchange；　



one　circumstance　only　interfering　with　the　simplicity　of　this



radical　idea　of　just　payment　　that　inasmuch　as　labour　（rightly



directed）　is　fruitful　just　as　seed　is；　the　fruit　（or　〃interest；〃



as　it　is　called）　of　the　labour　first　given；　or　〃advanced；〃　ought



to　be　taken　into　account；　and　balanced　by　an　additional　quantity



of　labour　in　the　subsequent　repayment。　Supposing　the　repayment　to



take　place　at　the　end　of　a　year；　or　of　any　other　given　time；　this



calculation　could　be　approximately　made；　but　as　money　（that　is　to



say；　cash）　payment　involves　no　reference　to　time　（it　being



optional　with　the　person　paid　to　spend　what　he　receives　at　once



or　after　any　number　of　years）；　we　can　only　assume；　generally；



that　some　slight　advantage　must　in　equity　be　allowed　to　the



person　who　advances　the　labour；　so　that　the　typical　form　of



bargain　will　be：　If　you　give　me　an　hour　to…day；　I　will　give　you



an　hour　and　five　minutes　on　demand。　If　you　give　me　a　pound　of



bread　to　day；　I　will　give　you　seventeen　ounces　on　demand；　and　so



on。　All　that　it　is　necessary　for　the　reader　to　note　is；　that　the



amount　returned　is　at　least　in　equity　not　to　be　less　than　the



amount　given。



　　　　The　abstract　idea；　then；　of　just　or　due　wages；　as　respects



the　labourer；　is　that　they　will　consist　in　a　sum　of　money　which



will　at　any　time　procure　for　him　at　least　as　much　labour　as　he



has　given；　rather　more　than　less。　And　this　equity　or　justice　of



payment　is；　observe；　wholly　independent　of　any　reference　to　the



number　of　men　who　are　willing　to　do　the　work。　I　want　a　horseshoe



for　my　horse。　Twenty　smiths；　or　twenty　thousand　smiths；　may　be



ready　to　forge　it；　their　number　does　not　in　one　atom's　weight



affect　the　question　of　the　equitable　payment　of　the　one　who　does



forge　it。　It　costs　him　a　quarter　of　an　hour　of　his　life；　and　so



much　skill　and　strength　of　arm　to　make　that　horseshoe　for　me。



Then　at　some　future　time　I　am　bound　in　equity　to　give　a　quarter



of　an　hour；　and　some　minutes　more；　of　my　life　（or　of　some　other



person's　at　my　disposal）；　and　also　as　much　strength　of　arm　and



skill；　and　a　little　more；　in　making　or　doing　what　the　smith　may



have　need　of。



　　　　Such　being　the　abstract　theory　of　just　remunerative　payment；



its　application　is　practically　modified　by　the　fact　that　the



order　for　labour；　given　in　payment；　is　general；　while　labour



received　is　special。　The　current　coin　or　document　is　practically



an　order　on　the　nation　for　so　much　work　of　any　kind；　and　this



universal　applicability　to　immediate　need　renders　it　so　much　more



valuable　than　special　labour　can　be；　that　an　order　for　a　less



quantity　of　this　general　toil　will　always　be　accepted　as　a　just



equivalent　for　a　greater　quantity　of　special　toil。　Any　given



craftsman　will　always　be　willing　to　give　an　hour　of　his　own　work



in　order　to　receive　command　over　half…an…hour；　or　even　much　less；



of　national　work。　This　source　of　uncertainty；　together。　with　the



difficulty　of　determining　the　monetary　value　of　skill；（10*）



renders　the　ascertainment　（even　approximate）　of　the　proper　wages



of　any　given　labour　in　terms　of　a　currency　matter　of　considerable



complexity。　But　they　do　not　affect　the　principle　of　exchange。　The



worth　of　the　work　may　not　be　easily　known；　but　it　has　a　worth；



just　as　fixed　and　real　as　the　specific　gravity　of　a　substance；



though　such　specific　gravity　may　not　be　easily　ascertainable　when



the　substance　is　united　with　many　others。　Nor　is　there　so　much



difficulty　or　chance　in　determining　it　as　in　determining　the



ordinary　maxima　and　minima　of　vulgar　political　economy。　There　are



few　bargains　in　which　the　buyer　can　ascertain　with　anything　like



precision　that　the　seller　would　have　taken　no　less；　　or　the



seller　acquire　more　than　a　comfortable　faith　that　the　purchaser



would　have　given　no　more。　This　impossibility　of　precise　knowledge



prevents　neither　from　striving　to　attain　the　desired　point　of



greatest　vexation　and　injury　to　the　other；　nor　from　accepting　it



for　a　scientific　principle　that　he　is　to　buy　for　the　least　and



sell　for　the　most　possible；　though　what　the　real　least　or　most



may　be　he　cannot　tell。　In　like　manner；　a　just　person　lays　it　down



for　a　scientific　principle　that　he　is　to　pay　a　just　price；　and；



without　being　able　precisely　to　ascertain　the　limits　of　such　a



price；　will　nevertheless　strive　to　attain　the　closest　possible



approximation　to　them。　A　practically　serviceable　approximation　he



can　obtain。　It　is　easier　to　determine　scientifically　what　a　man



ought　to　have　for　his　work；　than　what　his　necessities　will　compel



him　to　take　for　it。　His　necessities　can　only　be　ascertained　by



empirical；　but　his　due　by　analytical；　investigation。　In　the　one



case；　you　try　your　answer　to　the　sum　like　a　puzzled　schoolboy　



till　you　find　one　that　fits；　in　the　other；　you　bring　out　your



result　within　certain　limits；　by　process　of　calculation。



　　　　Supposing；　then；　the　just　wages　of　any　quantity　of　given



labour　to　have　been　ascertained；　let　us　examine　the　first　results



of　just　and　unjust　payment；　when　in　favour　of　the　purchaser　or



employer；　i。e。　when　two　men　are　ready　to　do　the　work；　and　only



one　wants　to　have　it　done。



　　　　The　unjust　purchaser　forces　the　two　to　bid　against　each　other



till　he　has　reduced　their　demand　to　its　lowest　terms。　Let　us



assume　that　the　lowest　bidder　offers　to　do　the　work　at　half　its



just　price。



　　　　The　purchaser　employs　him；　and　does　not　employ　the　other。　The



first　or　apparent　result　is；　therefore；　that　one　of　the　two　men



is　left　out　of　employ；　or　to　starvation；　just　as　definitely　as　by



the　just　procedure　of　giving　fair　price　to　the　best　workman。　The



various　writers　who　endeavoured　to　invalidate　the　positions　of　my



first　paper　never　saw　this；　and　assumed　that　the　unjust　hirer



employed　both。　He　employs　both　no　more　than　the　just　hirer。　The



only　difference　（in　the　outset；　is　that　the　just　man　pays



sufficiently；　the　unjust　man　insufficiently；　for　the　labour　of



the　single　person　employed。



　　　　I　say；　〃in　the　outset；〃　for　this　first　or　apparent；



difference　is　not　the　actual　difference。　By　the　unjust　procedure；



half　the　proper　price　of　the　work　is　left　in　the　hands　of　the



employer。　This　enables　him　to　hire　another　man　at　the　same　unjust



rate；　on　some　other　kind　of　work；　and　the　final　result　is　that　he



has　two　men　working　for　him　at　half　price；　and　two　are　out　of



employ。



　　　　By　the　just　procedure；　the　whole　price　of　the　first　piece　of



work　goes　in　the　hands　of　the　man　who　does　it。　No　surplus　being



left　in　the　employer's　hands；　he　cannot　hire　another　man　for



another　piece　of　labour。　But　by　precisely　so　much　as　his　power　is



diminished；　the　hired　workman's　power　is　increased；　that　is　to



say；　by　the　additional　half　of　the　price　he　has　received；　which



additional　half　he　has　the　power　of　using　to　employ　another　man



in　his　service。　I　will　suppose；　for　the　moment；　the　least



favourable；　though　quite　probable；　case　　that；　though　justly



treated　himself；　he　yet　will　act　unjustly　to　his　subordinate；　and



hire　at　half…price；　if　he　can。　The　final　result　will　then　be；



that　one　man　works　for　the　employer；　at　just　price；　one　for　the



workman；　at　half…price；　and　two；　as　in　the　first　case；　are　still



out　of　employ。　These　two；　as　I　said　before；　are　out　of　employ　in



both　cases。　The　difference　between　the　just　and　unjust　procedure



does　not　lie　in　the　number　of　men　hired；　but　in　the　price　paid　to



them；　and　the　persons　by　whom　it　is　paid。　The　essential



difference；　that　which　I　want　the　reader　to　see　clearly；　is；　that



in　the　unjust　case；　two　men　work　for　one；　the　first　hirer。　In　the



just　case；　one　man　works　for　the　first　hirer；　one　for　the　person



hired；　and　so　on；　down　or　up　through　the　various　grades　of



service；　the　influence　being　carried　forward　by　justice；　and



arrested　by　injustice。　The　universal　and　constant　action　of



justice　in　this　matter　is　therefore　to　diminish　the　power　oF



wealth；　in　the　hands　of　one　individual；　over　masses　of　men；　and



to　distribute　it　through　a　chain　of　men。　The　actual　power　exerted



by　the　wealth　is　the　same　in　both　cases；　but　by　injustice　it　is



put　all　into　one　man's　hands