darwin and modern science-µÚ141ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
Further¡¡illustrations¡¡of¡¡this¡¡subject¡¡might¡¡be¡¡given£»¡¡but¡¡enough¡¡has¡¡been¡¡said¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conclusions¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡drawn¡¡from¡¡this¡¡class¡¡of¡¡observation¡£
In¡¡my¡¡account¡¡of¡¡these¡¡remarkable¡¡systems¡¡the¡¡consideration¡¡of¡¡one¡¡very¡¡important¡¡conclusion¡¡has¡¡been¡¡purposely¡¡deferred¡£¡¡¡¡Since¡¡the¡¡light¡curve¡¡is¡¡explicable¡¡by¡¡eclipses£»¡¡it¡¡follows¡¡that¡¡the¡¡sizes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡stars¡¡are¡¡determinable¡¡relatively¡¡to¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡between¡¡them¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡period¡¡of¡¡their¡¡orbital¡¡motion¡¡is¡¡known£»¡¡being¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡the¡¡complete¡¡period¡¡of¡¡the¡¡variability¡¡of¡¡their¡¡light£»¡¡and¡¡an¡¡easy¡¡application¡¡of¡¡Kepler's¡¡law¡¡of¡¡periodic¡¡times¡¡enables¡¡us¡¡to¡¡compute¡¡the¡¡sum¡¡of¡¡the¡¡masses¡¡of¡¡the¡¡two¡¡stars¡¡divided¡¡by¡¡the¡¡cube¡¡of¡¡the¡¡distance¡¡between¡¡their¡¡centres¡£¡¡¡¡Now¡¡the¡¡sizes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡bodies¡¡being¡¡known£»¡¡the¡¡mean¡¡density¡¡of¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡system¡¡may¡¡be¡¡calculated¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡every¡¡case¡¡that¡¡density¡¡has¡¡been¡¡found¡¡to¡¡be¡¡much¡¡less¡¡than¡¡the¡¡sun's£»¡¡and¡¡indeed¡¡the¡¡average¡¡of¡¡a¡¡number¡¡of¡¡mean¡¡densities¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡determined¡¡only¡¡amounts¡¡to¡¡one¡eighth¡¡of¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡sun¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡some¡¡cases¡¡the¡¡density¡¡is¡¡extremely¡¡small£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡no¡¡case¡¡is¡¡it¡¡quite¡¡so¡¡great¡¡as¡¡half¡¡the¡¡solar¡¡density¡£
It¡¡would¡¡be¡¡absurd¡¡to¡¡suppose¡¡that¡¡these¡¡stars¡¡can¡¡be¡¡uniform¡¡in¡¡density¡¡throughout£»¡¡and¡¡from¡¡all¡¡that¡¡is¡¡known¡¡of¡¡celestial¡¡bodies¡¡it¡¡is¡¡probable¡¡that¡¡they¡¡are¡¡gaseous¡¡in¡¡their¡¡external¡¡parts¡¡with¡¡great¡¡condensation¡¡towards¡¡their¡¡centres¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡confirmed¡¡by¡¡arguments¡¡drawn¡¡from¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡rotating¡¡masses¡¡of¡¡liquid¡£¡¡¡¡£¨See¡¡J¡£H¡£¡¡Jeans£»¡¡¡¨On¡¡the¡¡density¡¡of¡¡Algol¡¡variables¡¨£»¡¡¡¨Astrophysical¡¡Journ¡£¡¨¡¡Vol¡£¡¡XXII¡£¡¡£¨1905£©£»¡¡page¡¡97¡££©
Although£»¡¡as¡¡already¡¡explained£»¡¡a¡¡good¡¡deal¡¡is¡¡known¡¡about¡¡the¡¡shapes¡¡and¡¡the¡¡stability¡¡of¡¡figures¡¡consisting¡¡of¡¡homogeneous¡¡incompressible¡¡liquid¡¡in¡¡rotation£»¡¡yet¡¡comparatively¡¡little¡¡has¡¡hitherto¡¡been¡¡discovered¡¡about¡¡the¡¡equilibrium¡¡of¡¡rotating¡¡gaseous¡¡stars¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡figures¡¡calculated¡¡for¡¡homogeneous¡¡liquid¡¡can¡¡obviously¡¡only¡¡be¡¡taken¡¡to¡¡afford¡¡a¡¡general¡¡indication¡¡of¡¡the¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡figure¡¡which¡¡we¡¡might¡¡expect¡¡to¡¡find¡¡in¡¡the¡¡stellar¡¡universe¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡dotted¡¡curve¡¡in¡¡Fig¡£¡¡5£»¡¡which¡¡exhibits¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡figures¡¡which¡¡I¡¡calculated£»¡¡has¡¡some¡¡interest¡¡when¡¡placed¡¡alongside¡¡the¡¡figures¡¡of¡¡the¡¡stars¡¡in¡¡RR¡¡Centauri£»¡¡as¡¡computed¡¡from¡¡the¡¡observations£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡must¡¡not¡¡be¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡the¡¡calculated¡¡form¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡system¡£¡¡¡¡I¡¡have¡¡moreover¡¡proved¡¡more¡¡recently¡¡that¡¡such¡¡a¡¡figure¡¡of¡¡homogeneous¡¡liquid¡¡is¡¡unstable¡£¡¡¡¡Notwithstanding¡¡this¡¡instability¡¡it¡¡does¡¡not¡¡necessarily¡¡follow¡¡that¡¡the¡¡analogous¡¡figure¡¡for¡¡compressible¡¡fluid¡¡is¡¡also¡¡unstable£»¡¡as¡¡will¡¡be¡¡pointed¡¡out¡¡more¡¡fully¡¡hereafter¡£
Professor¡¡Jeans¡¡has¡¡discussed¡¡in¡¡a¡¡paper¡¡of¡¡great¡¡ability¡¡the¡¡difficult¡¡problems¡¡offered¡¡by¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡equilibrium¡¡and¡¡of¡¡stability¡¡of¡¡a¡¡spherical¡¡nebula¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Trans¡£¡¡R¡£S¡£¡¨¡¡Vol¡£¡¡CXCIX¡£¡¡A¡¡£¨1902£©£»¡¡page¡¡1¡£¡¡¡¡See¡¡also¡¡A¡£¡¡Roberts£»¡¡¡¨S¡£¡¡African¡¡Assoc¡£¡¡Adv¡£¡¡Sci¡£¡¨¡¡Vol¡£¡¡I¡£¡¡£¨1903£©£»¡¡page¡¡6¡££©¡¡¡¡In¡¡a¡¡later¡¡paper¡¡£¨¡¨Astrophysical¡¡Journ¡£¡¨¡¡Vol¡£¡¡XXII¡£¡¡£¨1905£©£»¡¡page¡¡97¡££©£»¡¡in¡¡contrasting¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡which¡¡must¡¡govern¡¡the¡¡fission¡¡of¡¡a¡¡star¡¡into¡¡two¡¡parts¡¡when¡¡the¡¡star¡¡is¡¡gaseous¡¡and¡¡compressible¡¡with¡¡the¡¡corresponding¡¡conditions¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡incompressible¡¡liquid£»¡¡he¡¡points¡¡out¡¡that¡¡for¡¡a¡¡gaseous¡¡star¡¡£¨the¡¡agency¡¡which¡¡effects¡¡the¡¡separation¡¡will¡¡no¡¡longer¡¡be¡¡rotation¡¡alone£»¡¡gravitation¡¡also¡¡will¡¡tend¡¡towards¡¡separation¡£¡£¡£From¡¡numerical¡¡results¡¡obtained¡¡in¡¡the¡¡various¡¡papers¡¡of¡¡my¡¡own£»¡£¡£¡£I¡¡have¡¡been¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡a¡¡gravitational¡¡instability¡¡of¡¡the¡¡kind¡¡described¡¡must¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡agent¡¡at¡¡work¡¡in¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡the¡¡universe£»¡¡Laplace's¡¡rotation¡¡playing¡¡only¡¡the¡¡secondary¡¡part¡¡of¡¡separating¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡and¡¡satellite¡¡after¡¡the¡¡birth¡¡of¡¡the¡¡satellite¡£¡¨
It¡¡is¡¡desirable¡¡to¡¡add¡¡a¡¡word¡¡in¡¡explanation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡expression¡¡¡¨gravitational¡¡instability¡¨¡¡in¡¡this¡¡passage¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡means¡¡that¡¡when¡¡the¡¡concentration¡¡of¡¡a¡¡gaseous¡¡nebula¡¡£¨without¡¡rotation£©¡¡has¡¡proceeded¡¡to¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡stage£»¡¡the¡¡arrangement¡¡in¡¡spherical¡¡layers¡¡of¡¡equal¡¡density¡¡becomes¡¡unstable£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡form¡¡of¡¡bifurcation¡¡has¡¡been¡¡reached¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡further¡¡concentration¡¡concentric¡¡spherical¡¡layers¡¡become¡¡unstable£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡new¡¡stable¡¡form¡¡involves¡¡a¡¡concentration¡¡about¡¡two¡¡centres¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡first¡¡sign¡¡of¡¡this¡¡change¡¡is¡¡that¡¡the¡¡spherical¡¡layers¡¡cease¡¡to¡¡be¡¡quite¡¡concentric¡¡and¡¡then¡¡the¡¡layers¡¡of¡¡equal¡¡density¡¡begin¡¡to¡¡assume¡¡a¡¡somewhat¡¡pear¡shaped¡¡form¡¡analogous¡¡to¡¡that¡¡which¡¡we¡¡found¡¡to¡¡occur¡¡under¡¡rotation¡¡for¡¡an¡¡incompressible¡¡liquid¡£¡¡¡¡Accordingly¡¡it¡¡appears¡¡that¡¡while¡¡a¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡liquid¡¡is¡¡stable¡¡a¡¡sphere¡¡of¡¡gas¡¡may¡¡become¡¡unstable¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡stability¡¡are¡¡different¡¡in¡¡these¡¡two¡¡simple¡¡cases£»¡¡and¡¡it¡¡is¡¡likely¡¡that¡¡while¡¡certain¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡rotating¡¡liquid¡¡are¡¡unstable¡¡the¡¡analogous¡¡forms¡¡for¡¡gas¡¡may¡¡be¡¡stable¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡furnishes¡¡a¡¡reason¡¡why¡¡it¡¡is¡¡worth¡¡while¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡the¡¡unstable¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡rotating¡¡liquid¡£
There¡¡can¡¡I¡¡think¡¡be¡¡little¡¡doubt¡¡but¡¡that¡¡Jeans¡¡is¡¡right¡¡in¡¡looking¡¡to¡¡gravitational¡¡instability¡¡as¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡cause¡¡of¡¡fission£»¡¡but¡¡when¡¡we¡¡consider¡¡that¡¡a¡¡binary¡¡system£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡mass¡¡larger¡¡than¡¡the¡¡sun's£»¡¡is¡¡found¡¡to¡¡rotate¡¡in¡¡a¡¡few¡¡hours£»¡¡there¡¡seems¡¡reason¡¡to¡¡look¡¡to¡¡rotation¡¡as¡¡a¡¡contributory¡¡cause¡¡scarcely¡¡less¡¡important¡¡than¡¡the¡¡primary¡¡one¡£
With¡¡the¡¡present¡¡extent¡¡of¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡it¡¡is¡¡only¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡reconstruct¡¡the¡¡processes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡stars¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡inferences¡¡drawn¡¡from¡¡several¡¡sources¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡first¡¡to¡¡rely¡¡on¡¡the¡¡general¡¡principles¡¡of¡¡stability£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡which¡¡we¡¡are¡¡to¡¡look¡¡for¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡families¡¡of¡¡forms£»¡¡each¡¡terminating¡¡in¡¡an¡¡unstable¡¡form£»¡¡which¡¡itself¡¡becomes¡¡the¡¡starting¡point¡¡of¡¡the¡¡next¡¡family¡¡of¡¡stable¡¡forms¡£¡¡¡¡Secondly¡¡we¡¡have¡¡as¡¡a¡¡guide¡¡the¡¡analogy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡changes¡¡in¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡ideal¡¡liquid¡¡stars£»¡¡and¡¡thirdly¡¡we¡¡already¡¡possess¡¡some¡¡slender¡¡knowledge¡¡as¡¡to¡¡the¡¡equilibrium¡¡of¡¡gaseous¡¡stars¡£
From¡¡these¡¡data¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡build¡¡up¡¡in¡¡outline¡¡the¡¡probable¡¡history¡¡of¡¡binary¡¡stars¡£¡¡¡¡Originally¡¡the¡¡star¡¡must¡¡have¡¡been¡¡single£»¡¡it¡¡must¡¡have¡¡been¡¡widely¡¡diffused£»¡¡and¡¡must¡¡have¡¡been¡¡endowed¡¡with¡¡a¡¡slow¡¡rotation¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡this¡¡condition¡¡the¡¡strata¡¡of¡¡equal¡¡density¡¡must¡¡have¡¡been¡¡of¡¡the¡¡planetary¡¡form¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡it¡¡cooled¡¡and¡¡contracted¡¡the¡¡symmetry¡¡round¡¡the¡¡axis¡¡of¡¡rotation¡¡must¡¡have¡¡become¡¡unstable£»¡¡through¡¡the¡¡effects¡¡of¡¡gravitation£»¡¡assisted¡¡perhaps¡¡by¡¡the¡¡increasing¡¡speed¡¡of¡¡rotation¡£¡¡¡¡£¨I¡¡learn¡¡from¡¡Professor¡¡Jeans¡¡that¡¡he¡¡now¡¡£¨December¡¡1908£©¡¡believes¡¡that¡¡he¡¡can¡¡prove¡¡that¡¡some¡¡small¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡rotation¡¡is¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡induce¡¡instability¡¡in¡¡the¡¡symmetrical¡¡arrangement¡££©¡¡¡¡The¡¡strata¡¡of¡¡equal¡¡density¡¡must¡¡then¡¡become¡¡somewhat¡¡pear¡¡¡shaped£»¡¡and¡¡afterwards¡¡like¡¡an¡¡hour¡glass£»¡¡with¡¡the¡¡constriction¡¡more¡¡pronounced¡¡in¡¡the¡¡internal¡¡than¡¡in¡¡the¡¡external¡¡strata¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡constrictions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡strata¡¡then¡¡begin¡¡to¡¡rupture¡¡from¡¡the¡¡inside¡¡progressively¡¡outwards£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡at¡¡length¡¡all¡¡are¡¡ruptured¡¡we¡¡have¡¡the¡¡twin¡¡stars¡¡portrayed¡¡by¡¡Roberts¡¡and¡¡by¡¡others¡£
As¡¡we¡¡have¡¡seen£»¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡equilibrium¡¡of¡¡rotating¡¡liquid¡¡is¡¡almost¡¡complete£»¡¡and¡¡Jeans¡¡has¡¡made¡¡a¡¡good¡¡beginning¡¡in¡¡the¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡equilibrium¡¡of¡¡gaseous¡¡stars£»¡¡but¡¡much¡¡more¡¡remains¡¡to¡¡be¡¡discovered¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡field¡¡for¡¡the¡¡mathematician¡¡is¡¡a¡¡wide¡¡one£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡proportion¡¡as¡¡the¡¡very¡¡arduous¡¡exploration¡¡of¡¡that¡¡field¡¡is¡¡attained¡¡so¡¡will¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡processes¡¡of¡¡cosmical¡¡evolution¡¡increase¡£
From¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡observation£»¡¡improved¡¡methods¡¡in¡¡the¡¡use¡¡of¡¡the¡¡spectroscope¡¡and¡¡increase¡¡of¡¡accuracy¡¡in¡¡photometry¡¡will¡¡certainly¡¡lead¡¡to¡¡a¡¡great¡¡increase¡¡in¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡within¡¡the¡¡next¡¡few¡¡years¡£¡¡¡¡Probably¡¡the¡¡observational¡¡advance¡¡will¡¡be¡¡more¡¡rapid¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡theory£»¡¡for¡¡we¡¡know¡¡how¡¡extraordinary¡¡has¡¡been¡¡the¡¡success¡¡attained¡¡within¡¡the¡¡last¡¡few¡¡years£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡is¡¡one¡¡of¡¡extreme¡¡difficulty£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡two¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡proceed¡¡together¡¡hand¡¡in¡¡hand¡£¡¡¡¡Human¡¡life¡¡is¡¡too¡¡short¡¡to¡¡permit¡¡us¡¡to¡¡watch¡¡the¡¡leisurely¡¡procedure¡¡of¡¡cosmical¡¡evolution£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡celestial¡¡museum¡¡contains¡¡so¡¡many¡¡exhibits¡¡that¡¡it¡¡may¡¡become¡¡possible£»¡¡by¡¡the¡¡aid¡¡of¡¡theory£»¡¡to¡¡piece¡¡together¡¡bit¡¡by¡¡bit¡¡the¡¡processes¡¡through¡¡which¡¡stars¡¡pass¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡their¡¡evolution¡£
In¡¡the¡¡sketch¡¡which¡¡I¡¡have¡¡endeavoured¡¡to¡¡give¡¡of¡¡this¡¡fascinating¡¡subject£»¡¡I¡¡have¡¡led¡¡my¡¡reader¡¡to¡¡the¡¡very¡¡confines¡¡of¡¡our¡¡present¡¡knowledge¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡not¡¡much¡¡more¡¡than¡¡a¡¡quarter¡¡of¡¡a¡¡century¡¡since¡¡this¡¡class¡¡of¡¡observation¡¡has¡¡claimed¡¡the¡¡close¡¡attention¡¡of¡¡astronomers£»¡¡something¡¡considerable¡¡has¡¡been¡¡discovered¡¡already¡¡and¡¡there¡¡seems¡¡scarcely¡¡a¡¡discernible¡¡limit¡¡to¡¡what¡¡will¡¡be¡¡known¡¡in¡¡this¡¡field¡¡a¡¡century¡¡from¡¡now¡£¡¡¡¡Some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡results¡¡which¡¡I¡¡have¡¡set¡¡forth¡¡may¡¡then¡¡be¡¡shown¡¡to¡¡be¡¡false£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡seems¡¡profoundly¡¡improbable¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡being¡¡led¡¡astray¡¡by¡¡a¡¡Will¡of¡the¡Wisp¡£
XXIX¡£¡¡¡¡THE¡¡EVOLUTION¡¡OF¡¡MATTER¡£
By¡¡W¡£C¡£D¡£¡¡WHETHAM£»¡¡M¡£A¡££»¡¡F¡£R¡£S¡£¡¡Trinity¡¡College£»¡¡Cambridge¡£
The¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡evolution¡¡in¡¡the¡¡organic¡¡world£»¡¡made¡¡intelligible¡¡by¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡Charles¡¡Darwin£»¡¡has¡¡little¡¡in¡¡common¡¡with¡¡the¡¡recent¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡change¡¡in¡¡certain¡¡types¡¡of¡¡matter¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡discovery¡¡that¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡disintegration¡¡may¡¡take¡¡place¡¡in¡¡some¡¡at¡¡least¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chemical¡¡atoms£»¡¡previously¡¡believed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡indestructible¡¡and¡¡unalterable£»¡¡has¡¡modified¡¡our¡¡view¡¡of¡¡the¡¡physical¡¡universe£»¡¡even¡¡as¡¡Darwin's¡¡scheme¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡evolution¡¡changed¡¡the¡¡trend¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡concerning¡¡the¡¡organic¡¡world¡£¡¡¡¡Both¡¡conceptions¡¡have¡¡in¡¡common¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡change¡¡throughout¡¡extended¡¡realms¡¡of¡¡space¡¡and¡¡time£»¡¡and£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡perhaps¡¡not¡¡unfitting¡¡that¡¡some¡¡account¡¡of¡¡the¡¡most¡¡recent¡¡physical¡¡discoveries¡¡should¡¡be¡¡included¡¡in¡¡the¡¡present¡¡volume¡£
The¡¡earliest¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡the¡¡speculation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Greeks¡£¡¡¡¡Leucippus¡¡and¡¡Democritus¡¡imagined¡¡unchanging¡¡eternal¡¡atoms£»¡¡Heracleitus¡¡held¡¡that¡¡all¡¡things¡¡were¡¡in¡¡a¡¡continual¡¡state¡¡of¡¡fluxPanta¡¡rei¡£
But¡¡no¡¡one¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Ancient¡¡Worldno¡¡one¡¡till¡¡quite¡¡modern¡¡timescould¡¡appreciate¡¡the¡¡strength¡¡of¡¡the¡¡position¡¡which¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡must¡¡carry¡¡before¡¡it¡¡wins¡¡the¡¡day¡£¡¡¡¡Vague¡¡speculation£»¡¡even¡¡by¡¡the¡¡acute¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡philosophers£»¡¡is¡¡of¡¡little¡¡use¡¡in¡¡physical¡¡science¡¡before¡¡experimental¡¡facts¡¡are¡¡available¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡true¡¡problems¡¡at¡¡issue¡¡cannot¡¡even¡¡be¡¡formulated£»¡¡much¡¡less¡¡solved£»¡¡till¡¡the¡¡humble¡¡task¡¡of¡¡the¡¡observer¡¡and¡¡experimenter¡¡has¡¡given¡¡us¡¡a¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡to¡¡be¡¡explained¡£
It¡¡was¡¡only¡¡through¡¡the¡¡atomic¡¡theory£»¡¡at¡¡first¡¡apparently¡¡diametrically¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡it£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡evolution¡¡in¡¡the¡¡physical¡¡world¡¡was¡¡to¡¡gain¡¡an¡¡established¡¡place¡£¡¡¡¡For¡¡a¡¡century¡¡the¡¡atomic¡¡theory£»¡¡when¡¡put¡¡into¡¡a¡¡modern¡¡form¡¡by¡¡Dalton£»¡¡led¡¡farther¡¡and¡¡farther¡¡away¡¡from¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡change¡¡in¡¡matter¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡chemical¡¡elements¡¡seemed¡¡quite¡¡unalterable£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡atoms£»¡¡of¡¡which¡¡each¡¡element¡¡in¡¡modern¡¡view¡¡is¡¡composed£»¡¡bore¡¡to¡¡Clerk¡¡Maxwell£»¡¡writing¡¡about¡¡1870£»¡¡¡¨the¡¡stamp¡¡of¡¡manufactured¡¡articles¡¨¡¡exactly¡¡similar¡¡in¡¡kind£»¡¡unchanging£»¡¡eternal¡£
Nevertheless¡¡throughout¡¡these¡¡years£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡whole¡¡so¡¡unfavourable¡¡to¡¡its¡¡existence£»¡¡there¡¡persisted¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡origin¡¡of¡¡the¡¡distinct¡¡kinds¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡known¡¡to¡¡chemists¡£¡¡¡¡Indeed£»¡¡this¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡unity¡¡in¡¡substance¡¡in¡¡nature¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡accord¡¡with¡¡some¡¡innate¡¡desire¡¡or¡¡intimate¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡human¡¡mind¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡Mr¡¡Arthur¡¡Balfour¡¡well¡¡puts¡¡it£»¡¡¡¨There¡¡is¡¡no¡¡a¡¡priori¡¡reason¡¡that¡¡I¡¡know¡¡of¡¡for¡¡expecting¡¡that¡¡the¡¡material¡¡world¡¡should¡¡be¡¡a¡¡modification¡¡of¡¡a¡¡single¡¡medium£»¡¡rather¡¡than¡¡a¡¡composite¡¡structure¡¡built¡¡out¡¡of¡¡sixty¡¡or¡¡seventy¡¡elementary¡¡substances£»¡¡eter