darwin and modern science-µÚ142ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
f¡¡sixty¡¡or¡¡seventy¡¡elementary¡¡substances£»¡¡eternal¡¡and¡¡eternally¡¡different¡£¡¡¡¡Why¡¡then¡¡should¡¡we¡¡feel¡¡content¡¡with¡¡the¡¡first¡¡hypothesis¡¡and¡¡not¡¡with¡¡the¡¡second£¿¡¡¡¡Yet¡¡so¡¡it¡¡is¡£¡¡¡¡Men¡¡of¡¡science¡¡have¡¡always¡¡been¡¡restive¡¡under¡¡the¡¡multiplication¡¡of¡¡entities¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡have¡¡eagerly¡¡watched¡¡for¡¡any¡¡sign¡¡that¡¡the¡¡different¡¡chemical¡¡elements¡¡own¡¡a¡¡common¡¡origin£»¡¡and¡¡are¡¡all¡¡compounded¡¡out¡¡of¡¡some¡¡primordial¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡Nor£»¡¡for¡¡my¡¡part£»¡¡do¡¡I¡¡think¡¡that¡¡such¡¡instincts¡¡should¡¡be¡¡ignored¡£¡£¡£that¡¡they¡¡exist¡¡is¡¡certain£»¡¡that¡¡they¡¡modify¡¡the¡¡indifferent¡¡impartiality¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡empiricism¡¡can¡¡hardly¡¡be¡¡denied¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Report¡¡of¡¡the¡¡74th¡¡Meeting¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Association¡¨¡¡£¨Presidential¡¡Address£»¡¡Cambridge¡¡1904£©£»¡¡page¡¡9£»¡¡London£»¡¡1905¡££©
When¡¡Dalton's¡¡atomic¡¡theory¡¡had¡¡been¡¡in¡¡existence¡¡some¡¡half¡¡century£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡noted¡¡that¡¡certain¡¡numerical¡¡relations¡¡held¡¡good¡¡between¡¡the¡¡atomic¡¡weights¡¡of¡¡elements¡¡chemically¡¡similar¡¡to¡¡one¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡weight¡¡£¨88£©¡¡of¡¡an¡¡atom¡¡of¡¡strontium¡¡compared¡¡with¡¡that¡¡of¡¡hydrogen¡¡as¡¡unity£»¡¡is¡¡about¡¡the¡¡mean¡¡of¡¡those¡¡of¡¡calcium¡¡£¨40£©¡¡and¡¡barium¡¡£¨137£©¡£¡¡¡¡Such¡¡relations£»¡¡in¡¡this¡¡and¡¡other¡¡chemical¡¡groups£»¡¡were¡¡illustrated¡¡by¡¡Beguyer¡¡de¡¡Chancourtois¡¡in¡¡1862¡¡by¡¡the¡¡construction¡¡of¡¡a¡¡spiral¡¡diagram¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡atomic¡¡weights¡¡are¡¡placed¡¡in¡¡order¡¡round¡¡a¡¡cylinder¡¡and¡¡elements¡¡chemically¡¡similar¡¡are¡¡found¡¡to¡¡fall¡¡on¡¡vertical¡¡lines¡£
Newlands¡¡seems¡¡to¡¡have¡¡been¡¡the¡¡first¡¡to¡¡see¡¡the¡¡significance¡¡of¡¡such¡¡a¡¡diagram¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡his¡¡¡¨law¡¡of¡¡octaves£»¡¨¡¡formulated¡¡in¡¡1864£»¡¡he¡¡advanced¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡that£»¡¡if¡¡arranged¡¡in¡¡order¡¡of¡¡rising¡¡atomic¡¡weight£»¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡fell¡¡into¡¡groups£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡each¡¡eighth¡¡element¡¡was¡¡chemically¡¡similar¡£¡¡¡¡Stated¡¡thus£»¡¡the¡¡law¡¡was¡¡too¡¡definite£»¡¡no¡¡room¡¡was¡¡left¡¡for¡¡newly¡¡¡discovered¡¡elements£»¡¡and¡¡some¡¡dissimilar¡¡elements¡¡were¡¡perforce¡¡grouped¡¡together¡£
But¡¡in¡¡1869¡¡Mendeleeff¡¡developed¡¡Newland's¡¡hypothesis¡¡in¡¡a¡¡form¡¡that¡¡attracted¡¡at¡¡once¡¡general¡¡attention¡£¡¡¡¡Placing¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡in¡¡order¡¡of¡¡rising¡¡atomic¡¡weight£»¡¡but¡¡leaving¡¡a¡¡gap¡¡where¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡similar¡¡elements¡¡into¡¡vertical¡¡columns£»¡¡he¡¡obtained¡¡a¡¡periodic¡¡table¡¡with¡¡natural¡¡vacancies¡¡to¡¡be¡¡filled¡¡as¡¡new¡¡elements¡¡were¡¡discovered£»¡¡and¡¡with¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡flexibility¡¡at¡¡the¡¡ends¡¡of¡¡the¡¡horizontal¡¡lines¡£¡¡¡¡From¡¡the¡¡position¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vacancies£»¡¡the¡¡general¡¡chemical¡¡and¡¡physical¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡undiscovered¡¡elements¡¡could¡¡be¡¡predicted£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡success¡¡of¡¡such¡¡predictions¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡striking¡¡proof¡¡of¡¡the¡¡usefulness¡¡of¡¡Mendeleeff's¡¡generalisation¡£
When¡¡the¡¡chemical¡¡and¡¡physical¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡were¡¡known¡¡to¡¡be¡¡periodic¡¡functions¡¡of¡¡their¡¡atomic¡¡weights£»¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡origin¡¡and¡¡common¡¡substance¡¡became¡¡much¡¡more¡¡credible¡£¡¡¡¡Differences¡¡in¡¡atomic¡¡weight¡¡and¡¡differences¡¡in¡¡properties¡¡alike¡¡might¡¡reasonably¡¡be¡¡explained¡¡by¡¡the¡¡differences¡¡in¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡the¡¡primordial¡¡substance¡¡present¡¡in¡¡the¡¡various¡¡atoms£»¡¡an¡¡atom¡¡of¡¡oxygen¡¡being¡¡supposed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡composed¡¡of¡¡sixteen¡¡times¡¡as¡¡much¡¡stuff¡¡as¡¡the¡¡atom¡¡of¡¡hydrogen£»¡¡but¡¡to¡¡be¡¡made¡¡of¡¡the¡¡same¡¡ultimate¡¡material¡£¡¡¡¡Speculations¡¡about¡¡the¡¡mode¡¡of¡¡origin¡¡of¡¡the¡¡elements¡¡now¡¡began¡¡to¡¡appear£»¡¡and¡¡put¡¡on¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡air¡¡of¡¡reality¡£¡¡¡¡Of¡¡these¡¡speculations¡¡perhaps¡¡the¡¡most¡¡detailed¡¡was¡¡that¡¡of¡¡Crookes£»¡¡who¡¡imagined¡¡an¡¡initial¡¡chaos¡¡of¡¡a¡¡primordial¡¡medium¡¡he¡¡named¡¡protyle£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡periodic¡¡change¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡chemical¡¡elements¡¡successively¡¡were¡¡precipitated¡£
From¡¡another¡¡side¡¡too£»¡¡suggestions¡¡were¡¡put¡¡forward¡¡by¡¡Sir¡¡Norman¡¡Lockyer¡¡and¡¡others¡¡that¡¡the¡¡differences¡¡in¡¡spectra¡¡observed¡¡in¡¡different¡¡classes¡¡of¡¡stars£»¡¡and¡¡produced¡¡by¡¡different¡¡conditions¡¡in¡¡the¡¡laboratory£»¡¡were¡¡to¡¡be¡¡explained¡¡by¡¡changes¡¡in¡¡the¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vibrating¡¡atoms¡£
The¡¡next¡¡step¡¡in¡¡advance¡¡gave¡¡a¡¡theoretical¡¡basis¡¡for¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡matter£»¡¡and¡¡was¡¡taken¡¡in¡¡an¡¡unexpected¡¡direction¡£¡¡¡¡Clerk¡¡Maxwell's¡¡electromagnetic¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡light£»¡¡accepted¡¡in¡¡England£»¡¡was¡¡driven¡¡home¡¡to¡¡continental¡¡minds¡¡by¡¡the¡¡confirmatory¡¡experiments¡¡of¡¡Hertz£»¡¡who¡¡in¡¡1888¡¡detected¡¡and¡¡measured¡¡the¡¡electromagnetic¡¡waves¡¡that¡¡Maxwell¡¡had¡¡described¡¡twenty¡¡years¡¡earlier¡£¡¡¡¡But£»¡¡if¡¡light¡¡be¡¡an¡¡electromagnetic¡¡phenomenon£»¡¡the¡¡light¡¡waves¡¡radiated¡¡by¡¡hot¡¡bodies¡¡must¡¡take¡¡their¡¡origin¡¡in¡¡the¡¡vibrations¡¡of¡¡electric¡¡systems¡£¡¡¡¡Hence¡¡within¡¡the¡¡atoms¡¡must¡¡exist¡¡electric¡¡charges¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡vibration¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡these¡¡lines¡¡Lorentz¡¡and¡¡Larmor¡¡have¡¡developed¡¡an¡¡electronic¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡matter£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡imagined¡¡in¡¡its¡¡essence¡¡to¡¡be¡¡a¡¡conglomerate¡¡of¡¡electric¡¡charges£»¡¡with¡¡electro¡magnetic¡¡inertia¡¡to¡¡explain¡¡mechanical¡¡inertia¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Larmor£»¡¡¡¨Aether¡¡and¡¡Matter¡¨£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1900¡££©¡¡¡¡The¡¡movement¡¡of¡¡electric¡¡charges¡¡would¡¡be¡¡affected¡¡by¡¡a¡¡magnetic¡¡field£»¡¡and¡¡hence¡¡the¡¡discovery¡¡by¡¡Zeeman¡¡that¡¡the¡¡spectral¡¡lines¡¡of¡¡sodium¡¡were¡¡doubled¡¡by¡¡a¡¡strong¡¡magnetic¡¡force¡¡gave¡¡confirmatory¡¡evidence¡¡to¡¡the¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡electrons¡£
Then¡¡came¡¡J¡£J¡£¡¡Thomson's¡¡great¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡minute¡¡particles£»¡¡much¡¡smaller¡¡than¡¡any¡¡chemical¡¡atom£»¡¡forming¡¡a¡¡common¡¡constituent¡¡of¡¡many¡¡different¡¡kinds¡¡of¡¡matter¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Thomson£»¡¡¡¨Conduction¡¡of¡¡Electricity¡¡through¡¡Gases¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1906¡££©¡¡¡¡If¡¡an¡¡electric¡¡discharge¡¡be¡¡passed¡¡between¡¡metallic¡¡terminals¡¡through¡¡a¡¡glass¡¡vessel¡¡containing¡¡air¡¡at¡¡very¡¡low¡¡pressure£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡found¡¡that¡¡rectilinear¡¡rays£»¡¡known¡¡as¡¡cathode¡¡rays£»¡¡proceed¡¡from¡¡the¡¡surface¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cathode¡¡or¡¡negative¡¡terminal¡£¡¡¡¡Where¡¡these¡¡rays¡¡strike¡¡solid¡¡objects£»¡¡they¡¡give¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Rontgen¡¡rays¡¡now¡¡so¡¡well¡¡known£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡is¡¡with¡¡the¡¡cathode¡¡rays¡¡themselves¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡concerned¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡they¡¡strike¡¡an¡¡insulated¡¡conductor£»¡¡they¡¡impart¡¡to¡¡it¡¡a¡¡negative¡¡charge£»¡¡and¡¡Thomson¡¡found¡¡that¡¡they¡¡were¡¡deflected¡¡from¡¡their¡¡path¡¡both¡¡by¡¡magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡forces¡¡in¡¡the¡¡direction¡¡in¡¡which¡¡negatively¡¡electrified¡¡particles¡¡would¡¡be¡¡deflected¡£¡¡¡¡Cathode¡¡rays¡¡then¡¡were¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡flights¡¡of¡¡negatively¡¡charged¡¡particles£»¡¡moving¡¡with¡¡high¡¡velocities¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡electric¡¡and¡¡magnetic¡¡deflections¡¡give¡¡two¡¡independent¡¡measurements¡¡which¡¡may¡¡be¡¡made¡¡on¡¡a¡¡cathode¡¡ray£»¡¡and¡¡both¡¡the¡¡deflections¡¡involve¡¡theoretically¡¡three¡¡unknown¡¡quantities£»¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡the¡¡particles£»¡¡their¡¡electric¡¡charge¡¡and¡¡their¡¡velocity¡£¡¡¡¡There¡¡is¡¡strong¡¡cumulative¡¡evidence¡¡that¡¡all¡¡such¡¡particles¡¡possess¡¡the¡¡same¡¡charge£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡that¡¡associated¡¡with¡¡a¡¡univalent¡¡atom¡¡in¡¡electrolytic¡¡liquids¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡number¡¡of¡¡unknown¡¡quantities¡¡was¡¡thus¡¡reduced¡¡to¡¡twothe¡¡mass¡¡and¡¡the¡¡velocity¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡measurement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡deflections¡¡gave¡¡two¡¡independent¡¡relations¡¡between¡¡the¡¡unknowns£»¡¡which¡¡could¡¡therefore¡¡be¡¡determined¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡velocities¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cathode¡¡ray¡¡particles¡¡were¡¡found¡¡to¡¡vary¡¡round¡¡a¡¡value¡¡about¡¡one¡tenth¡¡that¡¡of¡¡light£»¡¡but¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡was¡¡found¡¡always¡¡to¡¡be¡¡the¡¡same¡¡within¡¡the¡¡limits¡¡of¡¡error£»¡¡whatever¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡the¡¡terminals£»¡¡of¡¡the¡¡residual¡¡gas¡¡in¡¡the¡¡vessel£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡experiment¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cathode¡¡ray¡¡particle£»¡¡or¡¡corpuscle£»¡¡as¡¡Thomson£»¡¡adopting¡¡Newton's¡¡name£»¡¡called¡¡it£»¡¡is¡¡about¡¡the¡¡eight¡hundredth¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡a¡¡hydrogen¡¡atom¡£
These¡¡corpuscles£»¡¡found¡¡in¡¡so¡¡many¡¡different¡¡kinds¡¡of¡¡substance£»¡¡are¡¡inevitably¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡a¡¡common¡¡constituent¡¡of¡¡matter¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡are¡¡associated¡¡each¡¡with¡¡a¡¡unit¡¡of¡¡negative¡¡electricity¡£¡¡¡¡Now¡¡electricity¡¡in¡¡motion¡¡possesses¡¡electromagnetic¡¡energy£»¡¡and¡¡produces¡¡effects¡¡like¡¡those¡¡of¡¡mechanical¡¡inertia¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡other¡¡words£»¡¡an¡¡electric¡¡charge¡¡possesses¡¡mass£»¡¡and¡¡there¡¡is¡¡evidence¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡the¡¡effective¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡a¡¡corpuscle¡¡increases¡¡as¡¡its¡¡velocity¡¡approaches¡¡that¡¡of¡¡light¡¡in¡¡the¡¡way¡¡it¡¡would¡¡do¡¡if¡¡all¡¡its¡¡mass¡¡were¡¡electromagnetic¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡are¡¡led¡¡therefore¡¡to¡¡regard¡¡the¡¡corpuscle¡¡from¡¡one¡¡aspect¡¡as¡¡a¡¡disembodied¡¡charge¡¡of¡¡electricity£»¡¡and¡¡to¡¡identify¡¡it¡¡with¡¡the¡¡electron¡¡of¡¡Lorentz¡¡and¡¡Larmor¡£
Thus£»¡¡on¡¡this¡¡theory£»¡¡matter¡¡and¡¡electricity¡¡are¡¡identified£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡great¡¡simplification¡¡of¡¡our¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡physical¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡Nature¡¡is¡¡reached¡£¡¡¡¡Moreover£»¡¡from¡¡our¡¡present¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view£»¡¡a¡¡common¡¡basis¡¡for¡¡matter¡¡suggests¡¡or¡¡implies¡¡a¡¡common¡¡origin£»¡¡and¡¡a¡¡process¡¡of¡¡development¡¡possibly¡¡intelligible¡¡to¡¡our¡¡minds¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡the¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡becomes¡¡much¡¡more¡¡probable¡£
The¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡and¡¡physical¡¡meaning¡¡of¡¡a¡¡corpuscle¡¡or¡¡electron¡¡remains¡¡for¡¡consideration¡£¡¡¡¡On¡¡the¡¡hypothesis¡¡of¡¡a¡¡universal¡¡luminiferous¡¡aether£»¡¡Larmor¡¡has¡¡suggested¡¡a¡¡centre¡¡of¡¡aethereal¡¡strain¡¡¡¨a¡¡place¡¡where¡¡the¡¡continuity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡medium¡¡has¡¡been¡¡broken¡¡and¡¡cemented¡¡together¡¡again¡¡£¨to¡¡use¡¡a¡¡crude¡¡but¡¡effective¡¡image£©¡¡without¡¡accurately¡¡fitting¡¡the¡¡parts£»¡¡so¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡residual¡¡strain¡¡all¡¡round¡¡the¡¡place¡£¡¨¡¡¡¡£¨Larmor£»¡¡loc¡£¡¡cit¡££©¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡he¡¡explains¡¡in¡¡quasi¡mechanical¡¡terms¡¡the¡¡properties¡¡of¡¡an¡¡electron¡£¡¡¡¡But¡¡whether¡¡we¡¡remain¡¡content¡¡for¡¡the¡¡time¡¡with¡¡our¡¡identification¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡and¡¡electricity£»¡¡or¡¡attempt¡¡to¡¡express¡¡both¡¡of¡¡them¡¡in¡¡terms¡¡of¡¡hypothetical¡¡aether£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡made¡¡a¡¡great¡¡step¡¡in¡¡advance¡¡on¡¡the¡¡view¡¡that¡¡matter¡¡is¡¡made¡¡up¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡atoms¡¡fundamentally¡¡distinct¡¡and¡¡eternally¡¡isolated¡£
Such¡¡was¡¡the¡¡position¡¡when¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡of¡¡radio¡activity¡¡threw¡¡a¡¡new¡¡light¡¡on¡¡the¡¡problem£»¡¡and£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡first¡¡time¡¡in¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡science£»¡¡gave¡¡definite¡¡experimental¡¡evidence¡¡of¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡of¡¡matter¡¡from¡¡one¡¡chemical¡¡element¡¡to¡¡another¡£
In¡¡1896¡¡H¡£¡¡Becquerel¡¡discovered¡¡that¡¡compounds¡¡of¡¡the¡¡metal¡¡uranium¡¡continually¡¡emitted¡¡rays¡¡capable¡¡of¡¡penetrating¡¡opaque¡¡screens¡¡and¡¡affecting¡¡photographic¡¡plates¡£¡¡¡¡Like¡¡cathode¡¡and¡¡Rontgen¡¡rays£»¡¡the¡¡rays¡¡from¡¡uranium¡¡make¡¡the¡¡air¡¡through¡¡which¡¡they¡¡pass¡¡a¡¡conductor¡¡of¡¡electricity£»¡¡and¡¡this¡¡property¡¡gives¡¡the¡¡most¡¡convenient¡¡method¡¡of¡¡detecting¡¡the¡¡rays¡¡and¡¡of¡¡measuring¡¡their¡¡intensity¡£¡¡¡¡An¡¡electroscope¡¡may¡¡be¡¡made¡¡of¡¡a¡¡strip¡¡of¡¡gold¡leaf¡¡attached¡¡to¡¡an¡¡insulated¡¡brass¡¡plate¡¡and¡¡confined¡¡in¡¡a¡¡brass¡¡vessel¡¡with¡¡glass¡¡windows¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡the¡¡gold¡leaf¡¡is¡¡electrified£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡repelled¡¡from¡¡the¡¡similarly¡¡electrified¡¡brass¡¡plate£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡angle¡¡at¡¡which¡¡it¡¡stands¡¡out¡¡measures¡¡the¡¡electrification¡£¡¡¡¡Such¡¡a¡¡system£»¡¡if¡¡well¡¡insulated£»¡¡holds¡¡its¡¡charge¡¡for¡¡hours£»¡¡the¡¡leakage¡¡of¡¡electricity¡¡through¡¡the¡¡air¡¡being¡¡very¡¡slow¡£¡¡¡¡But£»¡¡if¡¡radio¡active¡¡radiation¡¡reach¡¡the¡¡air¡¡within£»¡¡the¡¡gold¡leaf¡¡falls£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡its¡¡fall£»¡¡as¡¡watched¡¡through¡¡a¡¡microscope¡¡with¡¡a¡¡scale¡¡in¡¡the¡¡eye¡piece£»¡¡measures¡¡the¡¡intensity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radiation¡£¡¡¡¡With¡¡some¡¡form¡¡of¡¡this¡¡simple¡¡instrument£»¡¡or¡¡with¡¡the¡¡more¡¡complicated¡¡quadrant¡¡electrometer£»¡¡most¡¡radio¡¡¡active¡¡measurements¡¡have¡¡been¡¡made¡£
It¡¡was¡¡soon¡¡discovered¡¡that¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡compounds¡¡was¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡present¡¡in¡¡them¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡radio¡activity¡¡is¡¡an¡¡atomic¡¡property¡¡dependent¡¡on¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡an¡¡element¡¡and¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡its¡¡state¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡combination¡£
In¡¡a¡¡search¡¡for¡¡radio¡activity¡¡in¡¡different¡¡minerals£»¡¡M¡£¡¡and¡¡Mme¡¡Curie¡¡found¡¡a¡¡greater¡¡effect¡¡in¡¡pitch¡blende¡¡than¡¡its¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡uranium¡¡warranted£»¡¡and£»¡¡led¡¡by¡¡the¡¡radio¡active¡¡property¡¡alone£»¡¡they¡¡succeeded£»¡¡by¡¡a¡¡long¡¡series¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡separations£»¡¡in¡¡isolating¡¡compounds¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new¡¡and¡¡intensely¡¡radio¡active¡¡substance¡¡which¡¡they¡¡named¡¡radium¡£
Radium¡¡resembles¡¡barium¡¡in¡¡its¡¡chemical¡¡properties£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡precipitated¡¡with¡¡barium¡¡in¡¡the¡¡ordinary¡¡course¡¡of¡¡chemical¡¡analysis¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡separated¡¡by¡¡a¡¡prolonged¡¡course¡¡of¡¡successive¡¡crystallisation£»¡¡the¡¡chloride¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡being¡¡less¡¡soluble¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡barium£»¡¡and¡¡therefore¡¡sooner¡¡separated¡¡from¡¡an¡¡evaporating¡¡solution¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡isolated£»¡¡radium¡¡chloride¡¡has¡¡a¡¡composition£»¡¡which£»¡¡on¡¡the¡¡assumption¡¡that¡¡one¡¡atom¡¡of¡¡metal¡¡combines¡¡with¡¡two¡¡of¡¡chlorine¡¡as¡¡in¡¡barium¡¡chloride£»¡¡indicates¡¡that¡¡the¡¡relative¡¡weight¡¡of¡¡the¡¡atom¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡is¡¡