°®°®Ð¡ËµÍø > ÆäËûµç×ÓÊé > darwin and modern science >

µÚ143ÕÂ

darwin and modern science-µÚ143ÕÂ

С˵£º darwin and modern science ×ÖÊý£º ÿҳ3500×Ö

°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·­Ò³£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡



¡¡two¡¡of¡¡chlorine¡¡as¡¡in¡¡barium¡¡chloride£»¡¡indicates¡¡that¡¡the¡¡relative¡¡weight¡¡of¡¡the¡¡atom¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡is¡¡about¡¡225¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡thus¡¡prepared£»¡¡radium¡¡is¡¡a¡¡well¡­marked¡¡chemical¡¡element£»¡¡forming¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡compounds¡¡analogous¡¡to¡¡those¡¡of¡¡barium¡¡and¡¡showing¡¡a¡¡characteristic¡¡line¡¡spectrum¡£¡¡¡¡But£»¡¡unlike¡¡most¡¡other¡¡chemical¡¡elements£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡intensely¡¡radio¡­active£»¡¡and¡¡produces¡¡effects¡¡some¡¡two¡¡million¡¡times¡¡greater¡¡than¡¡those¡¡of¡¡uranium¡£

In¡¡1899¡¡E¡£¡¡Rutherford£»¡¡then¡¡of¡¡Montreal£»¡¡discovered¡¡that¡¡the¡¡radiation¡¡from¡¡uranium£»¡¡thorium¡¡and¡¡radium¡¡was¡¡complex¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Rutherford£»¡¡¡¨Radio¡­activity¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1905¡££©¡¡¡¡Three¡¡types¡¡of¡¡rays¡¡were¡¡soon¡¡distinguished¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡first£»¡¡named¡¡by¡¡Rutherford¡¡alpha¡­rays£»¡¡are¡¡absorbed¡¡by¡¡thin¡¡metal¡¡foil¡¡or¡¡a¡¡few¡¡centimetres¡¡of¡¡air¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡examined¡¡by¡¡measurements¡¡of¡¡the¡¡deflections¡¡caused¡¡by¡¡magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡fields£»¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­rays¡¡are¡¡found¡¡to¡¡behave¡¡as¡¡would¡¡positively¡¡electrified¡¡particles¡¡of¡¡the¡¡magnitude¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡¡possessing¡¡a¡¡double¡¡ionic¡¡charge¡¡and¡¡travelling¡¡with¡¡a¡¡velocity¡¡about¡¡one¡­tenth¡¡that¡¡of¡¡light¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡second¡¡or¡¡beta¡¡type¡¡of¡¡radiation¡¡is¡¡much¡¡more¡¡penetrating¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡will¡¡pass¡¡through¡¡a¡¡considerable¡¡thickness¡¡of¡¡metallic¡¡foil£»¡¡or¡¡many¡¡centimetres¡¡of¡¡air£»¡¡and¡¡still¡¡affect¡¡photographic¡¡plates¡¡or¡¡discharge¡¡electroscopes¡£¡¡¡¡Magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡forces¡¡deflect¡¡beta¡­rays¡¡much¡¡more¡¡than¡¡alpha¡­rays£»¡¡indicating¡¡that£»¡¡although¡¡the¡¡speed¡¡is¡¡greater£»¡¡approaching¡¡in¡¡some¡¡cases¡¡within¡¡five¡¡per¡¡cent¡£¡¡that¡¡of¡¡light£»¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡is¡¡very¡¡much¡¡less¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡beta¡­rays¡¡must¡¡be¡¡streams¡¡of¡¡particles£»¡¡identical¡¡with¡¡those¡¡of¡¡cathode¡¡rays£»¡¡possessing¡¡the¡¡minute¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡J¡£J¡£¡¡Thomson's¡¡corpuscle£»¡¡some¡¡eight¡­hundredth¡¡part¡¡of¡¡that¡¡of¡¡a¡¡hydrogen¡¡atom¡£¡¡¡¡A¡¡third¡¡or¡¡gamma¡¡type¡¡of¡¡radiation¡¡was¡¡also¡¡detected¡£¡¡¡¡More¡¡penetrating¡¡even¡¡than¡¡beta¡­rays£»¡¡the¡¡gamma¡­rays¡¡have¡¡never¡¡been¡¡deflected¡¡by¡¡any¡¡magnetic¡¡or¡¡electric¡¡force¡¡yet¡¡applied¡£¡¡¡¡Like¡¡Rontgen¡¡rays£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡probable¡¡that¡¡gamma¡­rays¡¡are¡¡wave¡­pulses¡¡in¡¡the¡¡luminiferous¡¡aether£»¡¡though¡¡the¡¡possibility¡¡of¡¡explaining¡¡them¡¡as¡¡flights¡¡of¡¡non¡­¡¡electrified¡¡particles¡¡is¡¡before¡¡the¡¡minds¡¡of¡¡some¡¡physicists¡£

Still¡¡another¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡radiation¡¡has¡¡been¡¡discovered¡¡more¡¡recently¡¡by¡¡Thomson£»¡¡who¡¡has¡¡found¡¡that¡¡in¡¡high¡¡vacua£»¡¡rays¡¡become¡¡apparent¡¡which¡¡are¡¡absorbed¡¡at¡¡once¡¡by¡¡air¡¡at¡¡any¡¡ordinary¡¡pressure¡£

The¡¡emission¡¡of¡¡all¡¡these¡¡different¡¡types¡¡of¡¡radiation¡¡involves¡¡a¡¡continual¡¡drain¡¡of¡¡energy¡¡from¡¡the¡¡radio¡­active¡¡body¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡M¡£¡¡and¡¡Mme¡¡Curie¡¡had¡¡prepared¡¡as¡¡much¡¡as¡¡a¡¡gramme¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡chloride£»¡¡the¡¡energy¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radiation¡¡became¡¡apparent¡¡as¡¡an¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡heat¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡radium¡¡salt¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡case¡¡containing¡¡it£»¡¡absorbed¡¡the¡¡major¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radiation£»¡¡and¡¡were¡¡thus¡¡maintained¡¡at¡¡a¡¡temperature¡¡measurably¡¡higher¡¡than¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡surroundings¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡thermal¡¡evolution¡¡was¡¡such¡¡that¡¡it¡¡appeared¡¡that¡¡one¡¡gramme¡¡of¡¡pure¡¡radium¡¡must¡¡emit¡¡about¡¡100¡¡gramme¡­calories¡¡of¡¡heat¡¡in¡¡an¡¡hour¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡observation£»¡¡naturally¡¡as¡¡it¡¡follows¡¡from¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡previously¡¡discovered£»¡¡first¡¡called¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡the¡¡energy¡¡which¡¡maintains¡¡indefinitely¡¡and¡¡without¡¡apparent¡¡diminution¡¡the¡¡wonderful¡¡stream¡¡of¡¡radiation¡¡proceeding¡¡from¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡solution¡¡of¡¡this¡¡problem¡¡lies¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡the¡¡present¡¡essay¡£

In¡¡order¡¡to¡¡appreciate¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡which¡¡bears¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡we¡¡must¡¡now¡¡describe¡¡two¡¡other¡¡series¡¡of¡¡phenomena¡£

It¡¡is¡¡a¡¡remarkable¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡intensity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radiation¡¡from¡¡a¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡¡body¡¡is¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡external¡¡conditions¡¡of¡¡temperature£»¡¡pressure£»¡¡etc¡£¡¡which¡¡modify¡¡so¡¡profoundly¡¡almost¡¡all¡¡other¡¡physical¡¡and¡¡chemical¡¡processes¡£¡¡¡¡Exposure¡¡to¡¡the¡¡extreme¡¡cold¡¡of¡¡liquid¡¡air£»¡¡or¡¡to¡¡the¡¡great¡¡heat¡¡of¡¡a¡¡furnace£»¡¡leaves¡¡the¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡substance¡¡unchanged£»¡¡apparent¡¡exceptions¡¡to¡¡this¡¡statement¡¡having¡¡been¡¡traced¡¡to¡¡secondary¡¡causes¡£

Then£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡found¡¡that¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡always¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡some¡¡chemical¡¡change£»¡¡a¡¡new¡¡substance¡¡always¡¡appears¡¡as¡¡the¡¡parent¡¡substance¡¡emits¡¡these¡¡radiations¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡by¡¡chemical¡¡reactions¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡separate¡¡from¡¡uranium¡¡and¡¡thorium¡¡minute¡¡quantities¡¡of¡¡radio¡­active¡¡materials¡¡to¡¡which¡¡the¡¡names¡¡of¡¡uranium¡­X¡¡and¡¡thorium¡­X¡¡have¡¡been¡¡given¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡bodies¡¡behave¡¡differently¡¡from¡¡their¡¡parents¡¡uranium¡¡and¡¡thorium£»¡¡and¡¡show¡¡all¡¡the¡¡signs¡¡of¡¡distinct¡¡chemical¡¡individuality¡£¡¡¡¡They¡¡are¡¡strongly¡¡radio¡­active£»¡¡while£»¡¡after¡¡the¡¡separation£»¡¡the¡¡parents¡¡uranium¡¡and¡¡thorium¡¡are¡¡found¡¡to¡¡have¡¡lost¡¡some¡¡of¡¡their¡¡radio¡­activity¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡the¡¡X¡­substances¡¡be¡¡kept£»¡¡their¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡decays£»¡¡while¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uranium¡¡or¡¡thorium¡¡from¡¡which¡¡they¡¡were¡¡obtained¡¡gradually¡¡rises¡¡to¡¡the¡¡initial¡¡value¡¡it¡¡had¡¡before¡¡the¡¡separation¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡any¡¡moment£»¡¡the¡¡sum¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡constant£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡lost¡¡by¡¡the¡¡product¡¡being¡¡equal¡¡to¡¡that¡¡gained¡¡by¡¡the¡¡parent¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡phenomena¡¡are¡¡explained¡¡if¡¡we¡¡suppose¡¡that¡¡the¡¡X¡­product¡¡is¡¡slowly¡¡produced¡¡in¡¡the¡¡substance¡¡of¡¡the¡¡parent£»¡¡and¡¡decays¡¡at¡¡a¡¡constant¡¡rate¡£¡¡¡¡Uranium£»¡¡as¡¡usually¡¡seen£»¡¡contains¡¡a¡¡certain¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡uranium¡­X£»¡¡and¡¡its¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡consists¡¡of¡¡two¡¡partsthat¡¡of¡¡the¡¡uranium¡¡itself£»¡¡and¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡X¡¡product¡£¡¡¡¡When¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡is¡¡separated¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡its¡¡chemical¡¡reactions£»¡¡its¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡separated¡¡also£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡rates¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡and¡¡recovery¡¡may¡¡be¡¡examined¡£

Radium¡¡and¡¡thorium£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡uranium£»¡¡give¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡radio¡­active¡¡gases¡¡which¡¡have¡¡been¡¡called¡¡emanations¡£¡¡¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡shown¡¡that¡¡their¡¡radio¡­¡¡activity£»¡¡like¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡X¡¡products£»¡¡suffers¡¡decay£»¡¡while¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vessel¡¡in¡¡which¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡is¡¡confined£»¡¡become¡¡themselves¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡washed¡¡with¡¡certain¡¡acids£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡lose¡¡their¡¡activity£»¡¡which¡¡is¡¡transferred¡¡to¡¡the¡¡acid£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡deposited¡¡by¡¡evaporation¡¡from¡¡it¡¡on¡¡to¡¡a¡¡solid¡¡surface¡£¡¡¡¡Here¡¡again¡¡it¡¡is¡¡clear¡¡that¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡gives¡¡rise¡¡to¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡substance¡¡which¡¡clings¡¡to¡¡the¡¡walls¡¡of¡¡the¡¡vessel£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡soluble¡¡in¡¡certain¡¡liquids£»¡¡but¡¡not¡¡in¡¡others¡£

We¡¡shall¡¡return¡¡to¡¡this¡¡point£»¡¡and¡¡trace¡¡farther¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡the¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡¡matter¡£¡¡¡¡At¡¡present¡¡we¡¡wish¡¡to¡¡emphasise¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡other¡¡cases£»¡¡the¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡is¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡a¡¡new¡¡kind¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡with¡¡distinct¡¡chemical¡¡properties¡£

We¡¡are¡¡now¡¡in¡¡a¡¡position¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡as¡¡a¡¡whole¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡on¡¡the¡¡question¡¡of¡¡the¡¡source¡¡of¡¡radio¡­active¡¡energy¡£

£¨1£©¡¡¡¡Radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡accompanied¡¡by¡¡the¡¡appearance¡¡of¡¡new¡¡chemical¡¡substances¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡energy¡¡liberated¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡probably¡¡due¡¡to¡¡the¡¡associated¡¡chemical¡¡change¡£¡¡¡¡£¨2£©¡¡¡¡The¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡series¡¡of¡¡compounds¡¡is¡¡found¡¡to¡¡accompany¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡element£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡each¡¡compound¡¡depends¡¡only¡¡on¡¡the¡¡contents¡¡of¡¡the¡¡element£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡its¡¡combination¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡a¡¡property¡¡of¡¡the¡¡element£»¡¡and¡¡is¡¡not¡¡affected¡¡by¡¡its¡¡state¡¡of¡¡isolation¡¡or¡¡chemical¡¡combination¡£¡¡£¨3£©¡¡¡¡The¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡transient¡¡product¡¡decays¡¡in¡¡a¡¡geometrical¡¡progression£»¡¡the¡¡loss¡¡per¡¡second¡¡being¡¡proportional¡¡to¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡substance¡¡still¡¡left¡¡at¡¡the¡¡moment£»¡¡and¡¡independent¡¡of¡¡its¡¡state¡¡of¡¡concentration¡¡or¡¡dilution¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡type¡¡of¡¡reaction¡¡is¡¡well¡¡known¡¡in¡¡chemistry¡¡to¡¡mark¡¡a¡¡mono¡­molecular¡¡change£»¡¡where¡¡each¡¡molecule¡¡is¡¡dissociated¡¡or¡¡altered¡¡in¡¡structure¡¡independently¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡two¡¡or¡¡more¡¡molecules¡¡were¡¡concerned¡¡simultaneously£»¡¡the¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡reaction¡¡would¡¡depend¡¡on¡¡the¡¡nearness¡¡of¡¡the¡¡molecules¡¡to¡¡each¡¡other£»¡¡that¡¡is£»¡¡to¡¡the¡¡concentration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡material¡£¡¡¡¡£¨4£©¡¡¡¡The¡¡amount¡¡of¡¡energy¡¡liberated¡¡by¡¡the¡¡change¡¡of¡¡a¡¡given¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡material¡¡far¡¡transcends¡¡the¡¡amount¡¡set¡¡free¡¡by¡¡any¡¡known¡¡ordinary¡¡chemical¡¡action¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡decays¡¡so¡¡slowly¡¡that¡¡it¡¡would¡¡not¡¡sink¡¡to¡¡half¡¡its¡¡initial¡¡value¡¡in¡¡less¡¡than¡¡some¡¡two¡¡thousand¡¡years£»¡¡and¡¡yet¡¡one¡¡gramme¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emits¡¡about¡¡100¡¡calories¡¡of¡¡heat¡¡during¡¡each¡¡hour¡¡of¡¡its¡¡existence¡£

The¡¡energy¡¡of¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡is¡¡due¡¡to¡¡chemical¡¡change£»¡¡but¡¡clearly¡¡to¡¡no¡¡chemical¡¡change¡¡hitherto¡¡familiar¡¡to¡¡science¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡an¡¡atomic¡¡property£»¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡a¡¡given¡¡element£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡atoms¡¡undergo¡¡the¡¡change¡¡individually£»¡¡not¡¡by¡¡means¡¡of¡¡interaction¡¡among¡¡each¡¡other¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡conclusion¡¡is¡¡irresistible¡¡that¡¡we¡¡are¡¡dealing¡¡with¡¡a¡¡fundamental¡¡change¡¡in¡¡the¡¡structure¡¡of¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡atoms£»¡¡which£»¡¡one¡¡by¡¡one£»¡¡are¡¡dissociating¡¡into¡¡simpler¡¡parts¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡are¡¡watching¡¡the¡¡disintegration¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨atoms¡¨¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chemist£»¡¡hitherto¡¡believed¡¡indestructible¡¡and¡¡eternal£»¡¡and¡¡measuring¡¡the¡¡liberation¡¡of¡¡some¡¡of¡¡the¡¡long¡­suspected¡¡store¡¡of¡¡internal¡¡atomic¡¡energy¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡stumbled¡¡on¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡dreamed¡¡by¡¡the¡¡alchemist£»¡¡and¡¡discovered¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡a¡¡veritable¡¡evolution¡¡of¡¡matter¡£

The¡¡transmutation¡¡theory¡¡of¡¡radio¡­activity¡¡was¡¡formulated¡¡by¡¡Rutherford¡¡£¨Rutherford£»¡¡¡¨Radio¡­activity¡¨¡¡£¨2nd¡¡edition£©£»¡¡Cambridge£»¡¡1905£»¡¡page¡¡307¡££©¡¡and¡¡Soddy¡¡in¡¡1903¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡its¡¡light£»¡¡all¡¡recent¡¡work¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡¡has¡¡been¡¡guided£»¡¡it¡¡has¡¡stood¡¡the¡¡supreme¡¡test¡¡of¡¡a¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡and¡¡shown¡¡power¡¡to¡¡suggest¡¡new¡¡investigations¡¡and¡¡to¡¡co¡­ordinate¡¡and¡¡explain¡¡them£»¡¡when¡¡carried¡¡out¡£¡¡¡¡We¡¡have¡¡summarised¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡which¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡theory£»¡¡we¡¡have¡¡now¡¡to¡¡consider¡¡the¡¡progress¡¡which¡¡has¡¡been¡¡made¡¡in¡¡tracing¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡of¡¡radio¡­active¡¡atoms¡£

Soon¡¡after¡¡the¡¡statement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡transmutation¡¡theory£»¡¡a¡¡striking¡¡verification¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡its¡¡consequences¡¡appeared¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡measurement¡¡of¡¡the¡¡magnetic¡¡and¡¡electric¡¡deflection¡¡of¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­rays¡¡suggested¡¡to¡¡Rutherford¡¡the¡¡idea¡¡that¡¡the¡¡stream¡¡of¡¡projectiles¡¡of¡¡which¡¡they¡¡consisted¡¡was¡¡a¡¡flight¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡£¡¡¡¡Ramsay¡¡and¡¡Soddy£»¡¡confining¡¡a¡¡minute¡¡bubble¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡in¡¡a¡¡fine¡¡glass¡¡tube£»¡¡were¡¡able¡¡to¡¡watch¡¡the¡¡development¡¡of¡¡the¡¡helium¡¡spectrum¡¡as£»¡¡day¡¡by¡¡day£»¡¡the¡¡emanation¡¡decayed¡£¡¡¡¡By¡¡isolating¡¡a¡¡very¡¡narrow¡¡pencil¡¡of¡¡alpha¡­rays£»¡¡and¡¡watching¡¡through¡¡a¡¡microscope¡¡their¡¡impact¡¡on¡¡a¡¡fluorescent¡¡screen£»¡¡Rutherford¡¡has¡¡lately¡¡counted¡¡the¡¡individual¡¡alpha¡­projectiles£»¡¡and¡¡confirmed¡¡his¡¡original¡¡conclusion¡¡that¡¡their¡¡mass¡¡corresponded¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡helium¡¡atoms¡¡and¡¡their¡¡charge¡¡to¡¡double¡¡that¡¡on¡¡a¡¡univalent¡¡atom¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Proc¡£¡¡Roy¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡A£»¡¡page¡¡141£»¡¡1908¡££©¡¡¡¡Still¡¡more¡¡recently£»¡¡he¡¡has¡¡collected¡¡the¡¡alpha¡­particles¡¡shot¡¡through¡¡an¡¡extremely¡¡thin¡¡wall¡¡of¡¡glass£»¡¡and¡¡demonstrated¡¡by¡¡direct¡¡spectroscopic¡¡evidence¡¡the¡¡presence¡¡of¡¡helium¡£¡¡¡¡£¨¡¨Phil¡£¡¡Mag¡£¡¨¡¡February¡¡1909¡££©

But¡¡the¡¡most¡¡thorough¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡pedigree¡¡is¡¡found¡¡in¡¡Rutherford's¡¡classical¡¡researches¡¡on¡¡the¡¡successive¡¡disintegration¡¡products¡¡of¡¡radium£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡follow¡¡the¡¡evidence¡¡on¡¡which¡¡his¡¡results¡¡are¡¡founded£»¡¡we¡¡must¡¡describe¡¡more¡¡fully¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡radio¡­active¡¡substance¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡the¡¡body¡¡known¡¡as¡¡uranium¡­X¡¡is¡¡shown¡¡in¡¡a¡¡falling¡¡curve¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡1¡££©¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡will¡¡be¡¡seen¡¡that£»¡¡in¡¡each¡¡successive¡¡22¡¡days£»¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡falls¡¡to¡¡half¡¡the¡¡value¡¡it¡¡possessed¡¡at¡¡the¡¡beginning¡£

This¡¡change¡¡in¡¡a¡¡geometrical¡¡progression¡¡is¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡simple¡¡radio¡­¡¡active¡¡processes£»¡¡and¡¡can¡¡be¡¡expressed¡¡mathematically¡¡by¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡exponential¡¡formula¡£

As¡¡we¡¡have¡¡said¡¡above£»¡¡solid¡¡bodies¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanations¡¡of¡¡radium¡¡or¡¡thorium¡¡become¡¡coated¡¡with¡¡a¡¡radio¡­active¡¡deposit¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡rate¡¡of¡¡decay¡¡of¡¡this¡¡activity¡¡depends¡¡on¡¡the¡¡time¡¡of¡¡exposure¡¡to¡¡the¡¡emanation£»¡¡and¡¡does¡¡not¡¡always¡¡show¡¡the¡¡usual¡¡simple¡¡type¡¡of¡¡curve¡£¡¡¡¡Thus¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡of¡¡a¡¡rod¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡radium¡¡emanation¡¡for¡¡1¡¡minute¡¡decays¡¡in¡¡accordance¡¡with¡¡a¡¡curve¡¡£¨Fig¡£¡¡2£©¡¡which¡¡represents¡¡the¡¡activity¡¡as¡¡measured¡¡by¡¡the¡¡

·µ»ØĿ¼ ÉÏÒ»Ò³ ÏÂÒ»Ò³ »Øµ½¶¥²¿ ÔÞ£¨0£© ²È£¨0£©

Äã¿ÉÄÜϲ»¶µÄ