darwin and modern science-µÚ28ÕÂ
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
ytology¡¡and¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡at¡¡variance¡¡with¡¡cytological¡¡facts¡£¡¡¡¡Many¡¡histological¡¡discoveries£»¡¡both¡¡such¡¡as¡¡have¡¡been¡¡proved¡¡correct¡¡and¡¡others¡¡which¡¡may¡¡be¡¡accepted¡¡as¡¡probably¡¡well¡¡founded£»¡¡have¡¡acquired¡¡a¡¡fundamental¡¡importance¡¡from¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡the¡¡problems¡¡of¡¡heredity¡£
My¡¡aim¡¡is¡¡to¡¡describe¡¡the¡¡present¡¡position¡¡of¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡Cytology¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡account¡¡must¡¡be¡¡confined¡¡to¡¡essentials¡¡and¡¡cannot¡¡deal¡¡with¡¡far¡¡¡reaching¡¡and¡¡controversial¡¡questions¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡cases¡¡where¡¡difference¡¡of¡¡opinion¡¡exists£»¡¡I¡¡adopt¡¡my¡¡own¡¡view¡¡for¡¡which¡¡I¡¡hold¡¡myself¡¡responsible¡£¡¡¡¡I¡¡hope¡¡to¡¡succeed¡¡in¡¡making¡¡myself¡¡intelligible¡¡even¡¡without¡¡the¡¡aid¡¡of¡¡illustrations£º¡¡¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡convey¡¡to¡¡the¡¡uninitiated¡¡an¡¡adequate¡¡idea¡¡of¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cell£»¡¡a¡¡greater¡¡number¡¡of¡¡figures¡¡would¡¡be¡¡required¡¡than¡¡could¡¡be¡¡included¡¡within¡¡the¡¡scope¡¡of¡¡this¡¡article¡£
So¡¡long¡¡as¡¡the¡¡most¡¡eminent¡¡investigators¡¡£¨As¡¡for¡¡example¡¡the¡¡illustrious¡¡Wilhelm¡¡Hofmeister¡¡in¡¡his¡¡¡¨Lehre¡¡von¡¡der¡¡Pflanzenzelle¡¨¡¡£¨1867£©¡££©¡¡believed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cell¡¡was¡¡destroyed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡each¡¡division¡¡and¡¡that¡¡the¡¡nuclei¡¡of¡¡the¡¡daughter¡cells¡¡were¡¡produced¡¡de¡¡novo£»¡¡theories¡¡of¡¡heredity¡¡were¡¡able¡¡to¡¡dispense¡¡with¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡£¡¡¡¡If¡¡they¡¡sought£»¡¡as¡¡did¡¡Charles¡¡Darwin£»¡¡who¡¡showed¡¡a¡¡correct¡¡grasp¡¡of¡¡the¡¡problem¡¡in¡¡the¡¡enunciation¡¡of¡¡his¡¡Pangenesis¡¡hypothesis£»¡¡for¡¡histological¡¡connecting¡¡links£»¡¡their¡¡hypotheses£»¡¡or¡¡at¡¡least¡¡the¡¡best¡¡of¡¡them£»¡¡had¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡the¡¡cell¡¡as¡¡a¡¡whole¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡known¡¡to¡¡Darwin¡¡that¡¡the¡¡cell¡¡multiplied¡¡by¡¡division¡¡and¡¡was¡¡derived¡¡from¡¡a¡¡similar¡¡pre¡existing¡¡cell¡£¡¡¡¡Towards¡¡1870¡¡it¡¡was¡¡first¡¡demonstrated¡¡that¡¡cell¡nuclei¡¡do¡¡not¡¡arise¡¡de¡¡novo£»¡¡but¡¡are¡¡invariably¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡division¡¡of¡¡pre¡existing¡¡nuclei¡£¡¡¡¡Better¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡investigation¡¡rendered¡¡possible¡¡a¡¡deeper¡¡insight¡¡into¡¡the¡¡phenomena¡¡accompanying¡¡cell¡¡and¡¡nuclear¡¡divisions¡¡and¡¡at¡¡the¡¡same¡¡time¡¡disclosed¡¡the¡¡existence¡¡of¡¡remarkable¡¡structures¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡work¡¡of¡¡O¡£¡¡Butschli£»¡¡O¡£¡¡Hertwig£»¡¡W¡£¡¡Flemming¡¡H¡£¡¡Fol¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡author¡¡of¡¡this¡¡article¡¡£¨For¡¡further¡¡reference¡¡to¡¡literature£»¡¡see¡¡my¡¡article¡¡on¡¡¡¨Die¡¡Ontogenie¡¡der¡¡Zelle¡¡seit¡¡1875¡¨£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡¡¨Progressus¡¡Rei¡¡Botanicae¡¨£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡I¡£¡¡page¡¡1£»¡¡Jena£»¡¡1907¡££©£»¡¡have¡¡furnished¡¡conclusive¡¡evidence¡¡in¡¡favour¡¡of¡¡these¡¡facts¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡found¡¡that¡¡when¡¡the¡¡reticular¡¡framework¡¡of¡¡a¡¡nucleus¡¡prepares¡¡to¡¡divide£»¡¡it¡¡separates¡¡into¡¡single¡¡segments¡£¡¡¡¡These¡¡then¡¡become¡¡thicker¡¡and¡¡denser£»¡¡taking¡¡up¡¡with¡¡avidity¡¡certain¡¡stains£»¡¡which¡¡are¡¡used¡¡as¡¡aids¡¡to¡¡investigation£»¡¡and¡¡finally¡¡form¡¡longer¡¡or¡¡shorter£»¡¡variously¡¡bent£»¡¡rodlets¡¡of¡¡uniform¡¡thickness¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡these¡¡organs¡¡which£»¡¡on¡¡account¡¡of¡¡their¡¡special¡¡property¡¡of¡¡absorbing¡¡certain¡¡stains£»¡¡were¡¡styled¡¡Chromosomes¡¡£¨By¡¡W¡£¡¡Waldeyer¡¡in¡¡1888¡££©£»¡¡there¡¡may¡¡usually¡¡be¡¡recognised¡¡a¡¡separation¡¡into¡¡thicker¡¡and¡¡thinner¡¡discs£»¡¡the¡¡former¡¡are¡¡often¡¡termed¡¡Chromomeres¡£¡¡¡¡£¨Discovered¡¡by¡¡W¡£¡¡Pfitzner¡¡in¡¡1880¡££©¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nucleus£»¡¡the¡¡single¡¡rows¡¡of¡¡chromomeres¡¡in¡¡the¡¡chromosomes¡¡are¡¡doubled¡¡and¡¡this¡¡produces¡¡a¡¡band¡like¡¡flattening¡¡and¡¡leads¡¡to¡¡the¡¡longitudinal¡¡splitting¡¡by¡¡which¡¡each¡¡chromosome¡¡is¡¡divided¡¡into¡¡two¡¡exactly¡¡equal¡¡halves¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡nuclear¡¡membrane¡¡then¡¡disappears¡¡and¡¡fibrillar¡¡cell¡plasma¡¡or¡¡cytoplasm¡¡invades¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡area¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡animal¡¡cells¡¡these¡¡fibrillae¡¡in¡¡the¡¡cytoplasm¡¡centre¡¡on¡¡definite¡¡bodies¡¡£¨Their¡¡existence¡¡and¡¡their¡¡multiplication¡¡by¡¡fission¡¡were¡¡demonstrated¡¡by¡¡E¡£¡¡van¡¡Beneden¡¡and¡¡Th¡£¡¡Boveri¡¡in¡¡1887¡££©£»¡¡which¡¡it¡¡is¡¡customary¡¡to¡¡speak¡¡of¡¡as¡¡Centrosomes¡£¡¡¡¡Radiating¡¡lines¡¡in¡¡the¡¡adjacent¡¡cell¡plasma¡¡suggest¡¡that¡¡these¡¡bodies¡¡constitute¡¡centres¡¡of¡¡force¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡cells¡¡of¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡plants¡¡do¡¡not¡¡possess¡¡such¡¡individualised¡¡centres£»¡¡they¡¡have¡¡probably¡¡disappeared¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡phylogenetic¡¡development£º¡¡¡¡in¡¡spite¡¡of¡¡this£»¡¡however£»¡¡in¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡figures¡¡the¡¡fibrillae¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cell¡plasma¡¡are¡¡seen¡¡to¡¡radiate¡¡from¡¡two¡¡opposite¡¡poles¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡both¡¡animal¡¡and¡¡plant¡¡cells¡¡a¡¡fibrillar¡¡bipolar¡¡spindle¡¡is¡¡formed£»¡¡the¡¡fibrillae¡¡of¡¡which¡¡grasp¡¡the¡¡longitudinally¡¡divided¡¡chromosomes¡¡from¡¡two¡¡opposite¡¡sides¡¡and¡¡arrange¡¡them¡¡on¡¡the¡¡equatorial¡¡plane¡¡of¡¡the¡¡spindle¡¡as¡¡the¡¡so¡¡¡called¡¡nuclear¡¡or¡¡equatorial¡¡plate¡£¡¡¡¡Each¡¡half¡chromosome¡¡is¡¡connected¡¡with¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡spindle¡¡poles¡¡only¡¡and¡¡is¡¡then¡¡drawn¡¡towards¡¡that¡¡pole¡£¡¡¡¡£¨These¡¡important¡¡facts£»¡¡suspected¡¡by¡¡W¡£¡¡Flemming¡¡in¡¡1882£»¡¡were¡¡demonstrated¡¡by¡¡E¡£¡¡Heuser£»¡¡L¡£¡¡Guignard£»¡¡E¡£¡¡van¡¡Beneden£»¡¡M¡£¡¡Nussbaum£»¡¡and¡¡C¡£¡¡Rabl¡££©
The¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡daughter¡nuclei¡¡is¡¡then¡¡effected¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡changes¡¡which¡¡the¡¡daughter¡chromosomes¡¡undergo¡¡in¡¡the¡¡process¡¡of¡¡producing¡¡the¡¡daughter¡¡¡nuclei¡¡repeat¡¡in¡¡the¡¡reverse¡¡order¡¡the¡¡changes¡¡which¡¡they¡¡went¡¡through¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡their¡¡progressive¡¡differentiation¡¡from¡¡the¡¡mother¡nucleus¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cell¡body¡¡is¡¡completed¡¡midway¡¡between¡¡the¡¡two¡¡daughter¡¡¡nuclei¡£¡¡¡¡In¡¡animal¡¡cells£»¡¡which¡¡possess¡¡no¡¡chemically¡¡differentiated¡¡membrane£»¡¡separation¡¡is¡¡effected¡¡by¡¡simple¡¡constriction£»¡¡while¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡plant¡¡cells¡¡provided¡¡with¡¡a¡¡definite¡¡wall£»¡¡the¡¡process¡¡begins¡¡with¡¡the¡¡formation¡¡of¡¡a¡¡cytoplasmic¡¡separating¡¡layer¡£
The¡¡phenomena¡¡observed¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡the¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡¡show¡¡beyond¡¡doubt¡¡that¡¡an¡¡exact¡¡halving¡¡of¡¡its¡¡substance¡¡is¡¡of¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡importance¡£¡¡¡¡£¨First¡¡shown¡¡by¡¡W¡£¡¡Roux¡¡in¡¡1883¡££©¡¡¡¡Compared¡¡with¡¡the¡¡method¡¡of¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nucleus£»¡¡that¡¡of¡¡the¡¡cytoplasm¡¡appears¡¡to¡¡be¡¡very¡¡simple¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡conception¡¡that¡¡the¡¡cell¡nucleus¡¡must¡¡be¡¡the¡¡chief¡¡if¡¡not¡¡the¡¡sole¡¡carrier¡¡of¡¡hereditary¡¡characters¡¡in¡¡the¡¡organism¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡for¡¡this¡¡reason¡¡that¡¡the¡¡detailed¡¡investigation¡¡of¡¡fertilisation¡¡phenomena¡¡immediately¡¡followed¡¡researches¡¡into¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡fundamental¡¡discovery¡¡of¡¡the¡¡union¡¡of¡¡two¡¡nuclei¡¡in¡¡the¡¡sexual¡¡act¡¡was¡¡then¡¡made¡¡£¨By¡¡O¡£¡¡Hertwig¡¡in¡¡1875¡££©¡¡and¡¡this¡¡afforded¡¡a¡¡new¡¡support¡¡for¡¡the¡¡correct¡¡conception¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡functions¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡minute¡¡study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡behaviour¡¡of¡¡the¡¡other¡¡constituents¡¡of¡¡sexual¡¡cells¡¡during¡¡fertilisation¡¡led¡¡to¡¡the¡¡result£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡¡alone¡¡is¡¡concerned¡¡with¡¡handing¡¡on¡¡hereditary¡¡characters¡¡£¨This¡¡was¡¡done¡¡by¡¡O¡£¡¡Hertwig¡¡and¡¡the¡¡author¡¡of¡¡this¡¡essay¡¡simultaneously¡¡in¡¡1884¡££©¡¡from¡¡one¡¡generation¡¡to¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡Especially¡¡important£»¡¡from¡¡the¡¡point¡¡of¡¡view¡¡of¡¡this¡¡conclusion£»¡¡is¡¡the¡¡study¡¡of¡¡fertilisation¡¡in¡¡Angiosperms¡¡£¨Flowering¡¡plants£©£»¡¡in¡¡these¡¡plants¡¡the¡¡male¡¡sexual¡¡cells¡¡lose¡¡their¡¡cell¡body¡¡in¡¡the¡¡pollen¡tube¡¡and¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡¡only¡¡the¡¡sperm¡nucleusreaches¡¡the¡¡egg¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡cytoplasm¡¡of¡¡the¡¡male¡¡sexual¡¡cell¡¡is¡¡therefore¡¡not¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡ensure¡¡a¡¡transference¡¡of¡¡hereditary¡¡characters¡¡from¡¡parents¡¡to¡¡offspring¡£¡¡¡¡I¡¡lay¡¡stress¡¡on¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms¡¡because¡¡researches¡¡recently¡¡repeated¡¡with¡¡the¡¡help¡¡of¡¡the¡¡latest¡¡methods¡¡failed¡¡to¡¡obtain¡¡different¡¡results¡£¡¡¡¡As¡¡regards¡¡the¡¡descendants¡¡of¡¡angiospermous¡¡plants£»¡¡the¡¡same¡¡laws¡¡of¡¡heredity¡¡hold¡¡good¡¡as¡¡for¡¡other¡¡sexually¡¡differentiated¡¡organisms£»¡¡we¡¡may£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡extend¡¡to¡¡the¡¡latter¡¡what¡¡the¡¡Angiosperms¡¡so¡¡clearly¡¡teach¡¡us¡£
The¡¡next¡¡advance¡¡in¡¡the¡¡hitherto¡¡rapid¡¡progress¡¡in¡¡our¡¡knowledge¡¡of¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡¡was¡¡delayed£»¡¡because¡¡it¡¡was¡¡not¡¡at¡¡once¡¡recognised¡¡that¡¡there¡¡are¡¡two¡¡absolutely¡¡different¡¡methods¡¡of¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡£¡¡¡¡All¡¡such¡¡nuclear¡¡divisions¡¡were¡¡united¡¡under¡¡the¡¡head¡¡of¡¡indirect¡¡or¡¡mitotic¡¡divisions£»¡¡these¡¡were¡¡also¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡as¡¡karyo¡kineses£»¡¡and¡¡were¡¡distinguished¡¡from¡¡the¡¡direct¡¡or¡¡amitotic¡¡divisions¡¡which¡¡are¡¡characterised¡¡by¡¡a¡¡simple¡¡constriction¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡body¡£¡¡¡¡So¡¡long¡¡as¡¡the¡¡two¡¡kinds¡¡of¡¡indirect¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡¡were¡¡not¡¡clearly¡¡distinguished£»¡¡their¡¡correct¡¡interpretation¡¡was¡¡impossible¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡was¡¡accomplished¡¡after¡¡long¡¡and¡¡laborious¡¡research£»¡¡which¡¡has¡¡recently¡¡been¡¡carried¡¡out¡¡and¡¡with¡¡results¡¡which¡¡should£»¡¡perhaps£»¡¡be¡¡regarded¡¡as¡¡provisional¡£
Soon¡¡after¡¡the¡¡new¡¡study¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡¡began£»¡¡investigators¡¡were¡¡struck¡¡by¡¡the¡¡fact¡¡that¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡¡in¡¡the¡¡mother¡cells£»¡¡or¡¡more¡¡correctly¡¡in¡¡the¡¡grandmother¡cells£»¡¡of¡¡spores£»¡¡pollen¡grains£»¡¡and¡¡embryo¡¡¡sacs¡¡of¡¡the¡¡more¡¡highly¡¡organised¡¡plants¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡spermatozoids¡¡and¡¡eggs¡¡of¡¡the¡¡higher¡¡animals£»¡¡exhibits¡¡similar¡¡phenomena£»¡¡distinct¡¡from¡¡those¡¡which¡¡occur¡¡in¡¡the¡¡somatic¡¡cells¡£
In¡¡the¡¡nuclei¡¡of¡¡all¡¡those¡¡cells¡¡which¡¡we¡¡may¡¡group¡¡together¡¡as¡¡gonotokonts¡¡£¨At¡¡the¡¡suggestion¡¡of¡¡J¡£P¡£¡¡Lotsy¡¡in¡¡1904¡££©¡¡£¨i¡£e¡£¡¡cells¡¡concerned¡¡in¡¡reproduction£©¡¡there¡¡are¡¡fewer¡¡chromosomes¡¡than¡¡in¡¡the¡¡adjacent¡¡body¡cells¡¡£¨somatic¡¡cells£©¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡noticed¡¡also¡¡that¡¡there¡¡is¡¡a¡¡peculiarity¡¡characteristic¡¡of¡¡the¡¡gonotokonts£»¡¡namely¡¡the¡¡occurrence¡¡of¡¡two¡¡nuclear¡¡divisions¡¡rapidly¡¡succeeding¡¡one¡¡another¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡was¡¡afterwards¡¡recognised¡¡that¡¡in¡¡the¡¡first¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡¡in¡¡the¡¡gonotokonts¡¡the¡¡chromosomes¡¡unite¡¡in¡¡pairs£º¡¡¡¡it¡¡is¡¡these¡¡chromosome¡pairs£»¡¡and¡¡not¡¡the¡¡two¡¡longitudinal¡¡halves¡¡of¡¡single¡¡chromosomes£»¡¡which¡¡form¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡plate¡¡in¡¡the¡¡equatorial¡¡plane¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡spindle¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡has¡¡been¡¡proposed¡¡to¡¡call¡¡these¡¡pairs¡¡gemini¡£¡¡¡¡£¨J¡£E¡£S¡£¡¡Moore¡¡and¡¡A¡£L¡£¡¡Embleton£»¡¡¡¨Proc¡£¡¡Roy¡£¡¡Soc¡£¡¨¡¡London£»¡¡Vol¡£¡¡LXXVII¡£¡¡page¡¡555£»¡¡1906£»¡¡V¡£¡¡Gregoire£»¡¡1907¡££©¡¡¡¡In¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡this¡¡division¡¡the¡¡spindle¡fibrillae¡¡attach¡¡themselves¡¡to¡¡the¡¡gemini£»¡¡i¡£e¡£¡¡to¡¡entire¡¡chromosomes¡¡and¡¡direct¡¡them¡¡to¡¡the¡¡points¡¡where¡¡the¡¡new¡¡daughter¡¡¡nuclei¡¡are¡¡formed£»¡¡that¡¡is¡¡to¡¡those¡¡positions¡¡towards¡¡which¡¡the¡¡longitudinal¡¡halves¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chromosomes¡¡travel¡¡in¡¡ordinary¡¡nuclear¡¡divisions¡£¡¡¡¡It¡¡is¡¡clear¡¡that¡¡in¡¡this¡¡way¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡chromosomes¡¡which¡¡the¡¡daughter¡nuclei¡¡contain£»¡¡as¡¡the¡¡result¡¡of¡¡the¡¡first¡¡stage¡¡in¡¡division¡¡in¡¡the¡¡gonotokonts£»¡¡will¡¡be¡¡reduced¡¡by¡¡one¡¡half£»¡¡while¡¡in¡¡ordinary¡¡divisions¡¡the¡¡number¡¡of¡¡chromosomes¡¡always¡¡remains¡¡the¡¡same¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡first¡¡stage¡¡in¡¡the¡¡division¡¡of¡¡the¡¡nucleus¡¡in¡¡the¡¡gonotokonts¡¡has¡¡therefore¡¡been¡¡termed¡¡the¡¡reduction¡¡division¡£¡¡¡¡£¨In¡¡1887¡¡W¡£¡¡Flemming¡¡termed¡¡this¡¡the¡¡heterotypic¡¡form¡¡of¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡££©¡¡¡¡This¡¡stage¡¡in¡¡division¡¡determines¡¡the¡¡conditions¡¡for¡¡the¡¡second¡¡division¡¡which¡¡rapidly¡¡ensues¡£¡¡¡¡Each¡¡of¡¡the¡¡paired¡¡chromosomes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡mother¡nucleus¡¡has¡¡already£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡an¡¡ordinary¡¡nuclear¡¡division£»¡¡completed¡¡the¡¡longitudinal¡¡fission£»¡¡but¡¡in¡¡this¡¡case¡¡it¡¡is¡¡not¡¡succeeded¡¡by¡¡the¡¡immediate¡¡separation¡¡of¡¡the¡¡longitudinal¡¡halves¡¡and¡¡their¡¡allotment¡¡to¡¡different¡¡nuclei¡£¡¡¡¡Each¡¡chromosome£»¡¡therefore£»¡¡takes¡¡its¡¡two¡¡longitudinal¡¡halves¡¡into¡¡the¡¡same¡¡daughter¡nucleus¡£¡¡¡¡Thus£»¡¡in¡¡each¡¡daughter¡nucleus¡¡the¡¡longitudinal¡¡halves¡¡of¡¡the¡¡chromosomes¡¡are¡¡present¡¡ready¡¡for¡¡the¡¡next¡¡stage¡¡in¡¡the¡¡division£»¡¡they¡¡only¡¡require¡¡to¡¡be¡¡arranged¡¡in¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡plate¡¡and¡¡then¡¡distributed¡¡among¡¡the¡¡granddaughter¡nuclei¡£¡¡This¡¡method¡¡of¡¡division£»¡¡which¡¡takes¡¡place¡¡with¡¡chromosomes¡¡already¡¡split£»¡¡and¡¡which¡¡have¡¡only¡¡to¡¡provide¡¡for¡¡the¡¡distribution¡¡of¡¡their¡¡longitudinal¡¡halves¡¡to¡¡the¡¡next¡¡nuclear¡¡generation£»¡¡has¡¡been¡¡called¡¡homotypic¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡£¡¡¡¡£¨The¡¡name¡¡was¡¡proposed¡¡by¡¡W¡£¡¡Flemming¡¡in¡¡1887£»¡¡the¡¡nature¡¡of¡¡this¡¡type¡¡of¡¡division¡¡was£»¡¡however£»¡¡not¡¡explained¡¡until¡¡later¡££©
Reduction¡¡division¡¡and¡¡homotypic¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡¡are¡¡included¡¡together¡¡under¡¡the¡¡term¡¡allotypic¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡¡and¡¡are¡¡distinguished¡¡from¡¡the¡¡ordinary¡¡or¡¡typical¡¡nuclear¡¡division¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡name¡¡Meiosis¡¡£¨By¡¡J¡£¡¡Bretland¡¡Farmer¡¡and¡¡J¡£E¡£S¡£¡¡Moore¡¡in¡¡1905¡££©¡¡has¡¡also¡¡been¡¡proposed¡¡for¡¡these¡¡two¡¡allotypic¡¡nuclear¡¡divisions¡£¡¡¡¡The¡¡typical¡¡divisions¡¡are¡¡often¡¡spoken¡¡of¡¡as¡¡somatic¡£
Observers¡¡who¡¡were¡¡actively¡¡engaged¡¡in¡¡this¡¡branch¡¡of¡¡recent¡¡histological¡¡research¡¡soon¡¡noticed¡¡that¡¡the¡¡chromosomes¡¡of¡¡a¡¡given¡¡organism¡¡are¡¡differentiated¡¡in¡¡definite¡¡numbers¡¡from¡¡the¡¡nuclear¡¡network¡¡in¡¡the¡¡course¡¡of¡¡division¡£¡¡¡¡This¡¡is¡¡especially¡¡striking¡¡in¡¡the¡¡gonotokonts£»¡¡but¡¡it¡¡applies¡¡also¡¡to¡¡the¡¡s