a theologico-political treatise [part iv]-第10章
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
gained more harm than good by such freedom； not to speak of the further
consequence； that if the prophets had retained their rights； great
civil wars would have resulted。
（26） III。 It is remarkable that during all the period； during which the
people held the reins of power； there was only one civil war； and that one
was completely extinguished； the conquerors taking such pity on the
conquered； that they endeavoured in every way to reinstate them in their
former dignity and power。 （27） But after that the people； little accustomed
to kings； changed its first form of government into a monarchy； civil war
raged almost continuously； and battles were so fierce as to exceed all
others recorded； in one engagement （taxing our faith to the utmost）
five hundred thousand Israelites were slaughtered by the men of Judah； and
in another the Israelites slew great numbers of the men of Judah （the
figures are not given in Scripture）； almost razed to the ground the walls of
Jerusalem； and sacked the Temple in their unbridled fury。 （28） At length；
laden with the spoils of their brethren； satiated with blood； they took
hostages； and leaving the king in his well…nigh devastated kingdom； laid
down their arms； relying on the weakness rather than the good faith of their
foes。 （29） A few years after； the men of Judah； with recruited strength；
again took the field； but were a second time beaten by the Israelites； and
slain to the number of a hundred and twenty thousand； two hundred thousand
of their wives and children were led into captivity； and a great booty again
seized。 （30） Worn out with these and similar battles set forth at length in
their histories； the Jews at length fell a prey to their enemies。
（18：31） Furthermore； if we reckon up the times during which peace prevailed
under each form of government； we shall find a great discrepancy。 （32）
Before the monarchy forty years and more often passed； and once eighty years
（an almost unparalleled period）； without any war； foreign or civil。 （33）
After the kings acquired sovereign power； the fighting was no longer for
peace and liberty； but for glory； accordingly we find that they all； with
the exception of Solomon （whose virtue and wisdom would be better displayed
in peace than in war） waged war； and finally a fatal desire for power gained
ground； which； in many cases； made the path to the throne a bloody one。
（18：34） Lastly； the laws； during the rule of the people； remained
uncorrupted and were studiously observed。 （35） Before the monarchy there
were very； few prophets to admonish the people； but after the establishment
of kings there were a great number at the same time。 （36） Obadiah saved a
hundred from death and hid them away； lest they should be slain with the
rest。 （37） The people； so far as we can see； were never deceived by false
prophets till after the power had been vested in kings； whose creatures many
of the prophets were。 （38） Again； the people； whose heart was generally
proud or humble according to its circumstances； easily corrected it…self
under misfortune； turned again to God； restored His laws； and so freed
itself from all peril； but the kings； whose hearts were always equally
puffed up； and who could not be corrected without humiliation； clung
pertinaciously to their vices； even till the last overthrow of the city。
＇18：2＇ （39） We may now clearly see from what I have said：…
（40） I。 How hurtful to religion and the state is the concession to ministers
of religion of any power of issuing decrees or transacting the business of
government： how； on the contrary； far greater stability is afforded； if the
said ministers are only allowed to give answers to questions duly put
to them； and are； as a rule； obliged to preach and practise the received and
accepted doctrines。
（18：41） II How dangerous it is to refer to Divine right matters merely
speculative and subject or liable to dispute。 （42） The most tyrannical
governments are those which make crimes of opinions； for everyone has an
inalienable right over his thoughts … nay； such a state of things leads to
the rule of popular passion。
（18：43） Pontius Pilate made concession to the passion of the Pharisees in
consenting to the crucifixion of Christ； whom he knew to be innocent。 （44）
Again； the Pharisees； in order to shake the position of men richer than
themselves； began to set on foot questions of religion； and accused the
Sadducees of impiety； and； following their example； the vilest … hypocrites；
stirred； as they pretended； by the same holy wrath which they called zeal
for the Lord； persecuted men whose unblemished character and distinguished
virtue had excited the popular hatred； publicly denounced their opinions；
and inflamed the fierce passions of the people against them。
（18：45） This wanton licence being cloaked with the specious garb of
religion could not easily be repressed； especially when the sovereign
authorities introduced a sect of which they； were not the head； they were
then regarded not as interpreters of Divine right； but as sectarians … that
is； as persons recognizing the right of Divine interpretation assumed by the
leaders of the sect。 （46） The authority of the magistrates thus became of
little account in such matters in comparison with the authority of sectarian
leaders before whose interpretations kings were obliged to bow。
（18：47） To avoid such evils in a state； there is no safer way； than to make
piety and religion to consist in acts only … that is； in the practice of
justice and charity； leaving everyone's judgment in other respects free。
（48） But I will speak of this more at length presently。
＇18：3＇ （49） III。 We see how necessary it is； both in the interests of the
state and in the interests of religion； to confer on the sovereign power the
right of deciding what is lawful or the reverse。 （50） If this right of
judging actions could not be given to the very prophets of God without great
injury； to the state and religion； how much less should it be entrusted to
those who can neither foretell the future nor work miracles！ （51） But this
again I will treat of more fully hereafter。
（18：52） IV。 Lastly；； we see how disastrous it is for a people unaccustomed
to kings； and possessing a complete code of laws； to set up a monarchy。 （53）
Neither can the subjects brook such a sway； nor the royal authority submit
to laws and popular rights set up by anyone inferior to itself。 （54） Still
less can a king be expected to defend such laws； for they were not framed to
support his dominion； but the dominion of the people； or some council which
formerly ruled； so that in guarding the popular rights the king would seem
to be a slave rather than a master。 （55） The representative of a new
monarchy will employ all his zeal in attempting to frame new laws； so
as to wrest the rights of dominion to his own use； and to reduce the people
till they find it easier to increase than to curtail the royal prerogative。
（56） I must not； however； omit to state that it is no less dangerous to
remove a monarch； though he is on all hands admitted to be a tyrant。 （57）
For his people are accustomed to royal authority and will obey no other；
despising and mocking at any less august control。
（18：58） It is therefore necessary； as the prophets discovered of old； if one
king be removed； that he should be replaced by another； who will be a tyrant
from necessity rather than choice。 （59） For how will he be able to endure
the sight of the hands of the citizens reeking with royal blood； and to
rejoice in their regicide as a glorious exploit？ （60） Was not the deed
perpetrated as an example and warning for himself？
（18：61） If he really wishes to be king； and not to acknowledge the people as
the judge of kings and the master of himself； or to wield a precarious sway；
he must avenge the death of his predecessor； making an example for his own
sake； lest the people should venture to repeat a similar crime。 （62） He will
not； however； be able easily to avenge the death of the tyrant by the
slaughter of citizens unless he defends the cause of tyranny and approves
the deeds of his predecessor； thus following in his footsteps。
（18：63） Hence it comes to pass that peoples have often changed their
tyrants； but never removed them or changed the monarchical form of
government into any other。
＇18：4＇ （64） The English people furnish us with a terrible example of this
fact。 （65） They sought how to depose their monarch under the forms of law；
but when he had been removed； they were utterly unable to change the form of
government； and after much bloodshed only brought it about； that a new
monarch should be hailed under a different name （as though it had been a
mere question of names）； this new monarch could only consolidate his power
by completely destroying the royal stock； putting to death the king's
friends； real or supposed； and disturbing with war the peace which might
encourage discontent； in order that the populace might be engrossed with
novelties and divert its mind from brooding over the slaughter of the king。
（66） At last； however； the people reflected that it had accomplished nothing
for the good of the country beyond violating the rights of the lawful king
and changing everything for the worse。 （67） It therefore decided to retrace
its steps as soon as possible； and never rested till it had seen a
complete restoration of the original state of affairs。
（18：68） It may perhaps be objected that the Roman people was easily able to
remove its tyrants； but I gather from its history a strong confirmation of
my contention。 （69） Though the Roman people was much more than
ordinarily capable of removing their tyrants and changing their
form of government； inasmuch as it held in its own hands the power of
electing its king and his successor； said being composed of rebels and
criminals had not long been used to the royal yoke （out of its six kings it
had put to death three）； nevertheless it could accomplish nothing
beyond electing several tyrants in place of one； who kept it groaning under
a continual state of war； both foreign and civil； till at last it changed
its government again to a form differing from monarchy； as in England； only
in name。
＇18：5＇ （70） As for the United States of the Netherlands； they have never； as
we know； had a king； but only counts； who never attained the full rights of
dominion。 （71） The States of the Netherlands evidently acted as principals
in the settlement made by them at the time of the Earl of Leicester's
mission： they always reserved for themselves the auth
